A moral relativist and a pragmatic walk into a bar...manic_depressive13 said:It is not my opinion only. It is the opinion of enough people in my society that there are laws prohibiting those things. The only morality is the collective morality. To the Japanese perhaps we are barbarians.Kendarik said:It's "fucked" based on your own opinion only. Nothing more. Other people have other opinions, there is no "definitely".
For example, in Australia where you live the age of consent is 18 for marriage. In Japan its 20. Are you barbarians because you picked a different arbitrary number? In the US of course a good number of states allow marriage at ANY age, as long as you have parental and/or court consent.
Are you sure you're not angry enough? The "I don't know" indicated that I can't can't say for certain why pedophilia or significant age gaps in relationships aren't smiled upon, but I have a general idea which probably constitutes at least part of the reason."I don't know" is the key to what you say above, it is totally without any foundation.OT: The half plus seven rule stands. It allows a generous dating pool for each age bracket without falling into "that's just gross" territory. As for why? I don't know. I guess the younger the person is, the more it seems like you're taking advantage of their naivety and insecurity. Someone much older getting with someone relatively inexperienced with the world just seems predatory.
But of course you don't mind pedophilia or slavery. You're a hardass little nihilist. You'd kill me as soon as look at me, eh?
My boyfriend and I are just on the edge of that xkcd equation.TheYellowCellPhone said:Rule of thumb: There is ALWAYS a relevant XKCD comic for every situation. Here ye are.
![]()
That's why it works out at the difference it does. If you see an 83 year old with an 80 year old as more acceptable than an 18 year old with a 15 year old, that's your personal belief.manic_depressive13 said:...What? The fact that a two or three year age gap in a relationship is far more socially acceptable later on in life than it is in one's teenage years has nothing to do with high school mathsTrilbyWill said:It's actually just a pretty basic linear recurrence relation. High-school maths.manic_depressive13 said:As for why? I don't know.
Actually it's been around a lot longer than that! I heard it way back when I was in school!Kendarik said:That's just a silly internet meme.Ordinaryundone said:I've always heard the acceptable low end was half your age, plus 7.
Yes, and I accept that. I just don't understand why you quoted me to tell me about maths when my question was clearly in a different context.TrilbyWill said:That's why it works out at the difference it does. If you see an 83 year old with an 80 year old as more acceptable than an 18 year old with a 15 year old, that's your personal belief.
Doesn't that end up weird? You'll reach 30 before she reaches/just reached 19.Monkeyman O said:The only thing that matters is the legal limit. I am 27 and am doing a 16 year old. 16 is the legal age here so who cares what anyone else thinks?
Uh... Say what? After 15 you won't be growing too much unless you started puberty really late.ObsidianJones said:Not to mention the real strain on her developing body that is not finishing growing.
Yeah, sure.ElPatron said:Uh... Say what? After 15 you won't be growing too much unless you started puberty really late.ObsidianJones said:Not to mention the real strain on her developing body that is not finishing growing.
Plus, I am pretty much convinced humans used to have children when they were 15. I don't know how could have we ever survived before we invented the consenting age.
So, I'd kinda like actual sources to those findings.
http://www.pregnantteenhelp.org/facts/risks-of-teenage-pregnancy/Physical Risks of Teenage Pregnancy
One risk of teenage pregnancy is physical. Of course, the younger the girl the harder a pregnancy and delivery would be on her body. Although most girls between ages 15 and 19 have few problems, anyone younger would face serious risks since the body would not yet be fully developed as a ?woman?.
Therefore, the number of cesareans sections is high in that the birthing canal is simply not large enough to accommodate the baby. Along with numerous health risks to the expectant mother, risks would also exist for the fetus and baby.
http://www.phaa.com/teenage-pregnancy-dangers-to-mother-and-baby-managing-the-pregnancy.htmTeens are at the higher risk for health problems during pregnancy and for the baby. The reason for this is because many teens who get pregnant are not fully developed and have issues with the toll pregnancy takes on their body.
.Adolescence is the time of normal growth and development of the body. If at this time, additional strain is put on the body as a result of pregnancy, the teen?s body may not be fully equipped to cope with such a situation. This physical strain, compounded with emotional and social issues, especially in case of unmarried teens, may pose various threats to the pregnancy as well as health of the mother and her child
So, I mean you can take your pick on what you want to believe.Risks
Compared with mothers in older age groups, teenage mothers are at greater risk of having medical complications. Because the teenage mother is more likely to receive little or no prenatal care, she often becomes anemic and is more likely to develop preeclampsia, a severe condition associated with high blood pressure.
Vitamin deficiencies are more common, and the teenage mother's weight gain is likely to be inadequate. Since the teenage mother is still growing herself, she needs to eat properly not only for her own growth but for normal growth of the fetus.
Pelvic bones do not reach their maximum size until about the age of 18; therefore, the pelvis of the teenage mother may not have grown enough to allow vaginal delivery of a normal-size baby. For this reason, the incidence of cesarean section is higher in teenage mothers -- a baby that can be delivered vaginally when the mother is 20 is often too large to have been delivered vaginally when she was 14 years old.
That part made me think of the Nicholas Cage image macro "You don't say?"ObsidianJones said:So, I mean you can take your pick on what you want to believe.a baby that can be delivered vaginally when the mother is 20 is often too large to have been delivered vaginally when she was 14 years old.