What's the problem with Nudity and Swearing?

Recommended Videos

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
ThreeWords said:
SextusMaximus said:
BTW Nudity IS NOT EQUAL TO Sex - which probably isn't that bad either [provided it's not sodomy]
I agree in general, except for this exert. Why, if sex is allowable, is gay sex somehow worse?
Sodomy is not only gay sex.

Definition of SODOMY (from Merriam-Webster Online)
: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex; also : copulation with an animal.
 

Robyrt

New member
Aug 1, 2008
568
0
0
News flash: Obscene words are a cultural construct, deriving meaning specifically from their taboo status. If no one used it as an expletive intended to get a specific reaction from the hearer, it would be just another word. By using such a word in an everyday context, you are attempting to make it less offensive and impactful, at which point a new more shocking word will take its place.

Incidentally, I have never cursed in my life. I just never got into the habit as a child, and now when I want an expletive all I can think of is Comics Code-approved stuff like "Curses!"
 

Peteron

New member
Oct 9, 2009
1,378
0
0
Ok, lets start with swearing shall we? I, like all of you here, curse sometimes. It is a natural thing. People swear in movies, games and in real life, which is fine with me. However, when it is excessive it loses its effect and just becomes unpleasant to listen to. As for nudity, yea the human body is "beautiful" to many. (Hopefully people talking about the opposite sex) And it is shown in movies as well, but not as often these days. In movies it is probably picked on because many younger kids go to see these films, so you hear the parents talking. Plus, being a stripper isn't exactly an honorable profession.
 

TheTaco007

New member
Sep 10, 2009
1,339
0
0
If swearing weren't offensive and taboo, it would defeat the whole point of it. That's why I hate people who swear at least twice in every sentence. It looses meaning.

Nudity on the other hand, there shouldn't be as much of a problem with. Well, actually, that's not true. If everyone was completely naked, there'd be issues, but if nobody cared about people being topless, there'd be no harm done.
 

Varanfan9

New member
Mar 12, 2010
788
0
0
Nothing is wrong with either. Swear words are again just words that are only as bad as you consider them. As for nudity, well I found the source of this. A couple hundred years ago the Catholic Church declared certain parts of the human body to be bad. Before that no one cared about nudity. Hell ancient Egyptian children wore nothing and no one complained. But since then we have been all uppity about nudity which is not really all that wrong. Its just skin people get over it. And why are women's breasts considered obscene but men's are not. Because there elevated? Not really a good reason.
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,506
0
0
Robyrt said:
News flash: Obscene words are a cultural construct, deriving meaning specifically from their taboo status. If no one used it as an expletive intended to get a specific reaction from the hearer, it would be just another word. By using such a word in an everyday context, you are attempting to make it less offensive and impactful, at which point a new more shocking word will take its place.

Incidentally, I have never cursed in my life. I just never got into the habit as a child, and now when I want an expletive all I can think of is Comics Code-approved stuff like "Curses!"
Please, PLEASE read the other comments in the thread. All of this stuff has been covered before...
 

Requx

New member
Mar 28, 2010
378
0
0
The only reason we can't swear all the time is because nobody likes it when kids swear because they don't even fucking understand what they're saying and they're not mature enough to understand it so they just do it constantly. Nudity on the other hand I would like to thank unatractive people for... and I guess religion. There are lots of WOMEN I wouldnt mind seeing naked all the time, that said there are some I'd rather not see. And I don't really wanna look at naked dudes. I mean even in Sparta they dont believe in Total nudity.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
Hollyosaur said:
Some people can be quite prudish.
And I am one of those prudes! Not necessarily an anti-nude, anti-bad-word Nazi though. I just like it to be used either contextually correctly or, as a sweet little extra.

Like in Clerks, the swearing works because of the style of that movie anyway. It makes the movie seem real (although weird to have so many chest/face level security cameras) In Dead to Rights: Retribution though, the swearing just seems to indicate that the people writing the script had no idea how to make a 'bad ass cop on the edge' character without having every other word he uses rhyming with the Pokemon 'muk'. As for the thugs he kills; they're bad guys and as we all know, bad people never cease with the swearing

As for nudity, that's a bit more tricky. Personally, I prefer near nudity as it leave more to the imagination. Nothing ruins a nude-shot for example, like plate-sized nipples or...you know what, I'll keep quite (as the nipple thing probably already earned me a probation). Remember the original Mass Effect? You didn't see much but you saw enough to know that nudity was happening. It had the look and feel of a tender love scene which would arguably requires subtlety. You knew, however, exactly what Shepard and his Assari consort (or whoever you banged) were doing without seeing so much as a nipple.

Soft-Core porn on the other hand is hilarious. The fact that the people are naked is just the pie-in-the-face mainly because you know there is nothing at all happening down there.

I've lost my train of thought so sorry about the rambling text wall.In short: bad words and nudity =/= bad. Too much of it however, does.
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,506
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
If swearing was ok then there would be no point in swearing.
By that logic, the entire world is pointless.

Money is pointless.
Food is pointless.
Water is pointless.

Did..

Did you even listen to Mr Fry? :D
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,506
0
0
Shoggoth2588 said:
Hollyosaur said:
Some people can be quite prudish.
And I am one of those prudes! Not necessarily an anti-nude, anti-bad-word Nazi though. I just like it to be used either contextually correctly or, as a sweet little extra.

Like in Clerks, the swearing works because of the style of that movie anyway. It makes the movie seem real (although weird to have so many chest/face level security cameras) In Dead to Rights: Retribution though, the swearing just seems to indicate that the people writing the script had no idea how to make a 'bad ass cop on the edge' character without having every other word he uses rhyming with the Pokemon 'muk'. As for the thugs he kills; they're bad guys and as we all know, bad people never cease with the swearing

As for nudity, that's a bit more tricky. Personally, I prefer near nudity as it leave more to the imagination. Nothing ruins a nude-shot for example, like plate-sized nipples or...you know what, I'll keep quite (as the nipple thing probably already earned me a probation). Remember the original Mass Effect? You didn't see much but you saw enough to know that nudity was happening. It had the look and feel of a tender love scene which would arguably requires subtlety. You knew, however, exactly what Shepard and his Assari consort (or whoever you banged) were doing without seeing so much as a nipple.

Soft-Core porn on the other hand is hilarious. The fact that the people are naked is just the pie-in-the-face mainly because you know there is nothing at all happening down there.

I've lost my train of thought so sorry about the rambling text wall.In short: bad words and nudity =/= bad. Too much of it however, does.
I agree completely about the nudity. Too much of any good thing is bad.

Cake is fantastic. I love eating cake, it tastes great. But too much of it is a BAD thing. Same with swearing. Don't use it all the time, but feel free to use it expressing anger or to give a description to something.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,635
0
0
Well our view of swearing comes from when those words were really offensive. People say fuck, damn, hell, or shit all the time now and they don't really mean as much today beyond being curse words. But back when this whole view was formed, saying fuck or ***** in regular conversation was the modern day equivalent of saying ****** or ****** (the homophobic slur, not the name for a bundle of twigs). Curse words held some power back then that they rarely do nowadays. I have nothing against swearing, but there are times and places for it. When you're in pain there should be nothing wrong with letting out a nice "FUCK!" to let everyone know how you feel (horrible, thanks for asking). Swearing can also be used for humor, as a well placed swear can really spice up a joke.

As for nudity, its probably because in our culture (at least in America, can't speak for other nations) sex is at its least a very private thing and at its worse a neccessary evil that should be avoid for as long as possible. Doesn't make much sense, as sex is a beautiful thing and really shouldn't be classified as being the same as violence in terms of vulgarity. Where does nudity fit into this? Nudity is generally equated with sex (in America!) so thus its a big no-no to be nude most of the time. But, rather than causing people to not get so excited when some skin is shown, it has the opposite effect; since it only paritially represses peoples natural sexual urges thus causing people to react more when presented with nudity. I'd have to agree that if nudity was so taboo and everyone was doing it then it wouldn't be such a big deal to most people. The only problem is that if nudity were to become more common, the view of a naked body wouldn't cause as much arousal. Make of that what you will. Plus, wearing clothing has its uses. In colder climes, going nude in the middle of winter is just plain stupid. It can also be useful when weather conditions are somewhat harmful. I guess that I believe the gentalia should be kept under wraps but anything else should be let out when wanted (and when its smart to do so).
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,672
0
0
SextusMaximus said:
TheRightToArmBears said:
If swearing was ok then there would be no point in swearing.
By that logic, the entire world is pointless.

Money is pointless.
Food is pointless.
Water is pointless.
Nope.

The point (or one of the big points) of swearing is that it's shocking if done right. Of course, if swearing ceases to be shocking then it's fairly useless.

It goes without saying that money, food and water aren't made to be shocking.
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
SextusMaximus said:
C) Isn't it hypocritical that one part of society are saying that the human body is a beautiful thing, while another part are ranting about how disgusting it it?
No, because 'society' is not one giant monolithic blob.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
21,023
5,918
118
I'll give you an example why nudity and swearing is not necessarily bad, but immature; Spartacus. That show could've been very good if it didn't throw tits and fucks at you every damn second.

Contrary to popular belief, words have meaning. And so does swearing and cursing. If you're pissed off and you need to vent, by all means, curse a blue streak. But just swearing for the hell of it (I'm looking at you Spartacus) is stupid, unnecessary and immature.

As for nudity: The average naked person is ugly.

EDIT: Also, most nudity on TV or in movies is rarely used in proper context (not for kids atleast). Most of the time, it's used for either erotisism, shock value or comedy. If it's for comedy I dont mind kids seeing it.
 

Xojins

New member
Jan 7, 2008
1,538
0
0
CaptainCrunch said:
A taboo is derived from context, and context is defined by societal constraint. Society is constantly shaped by history, and history remembers its taboos.

Take the taboo of swearing - it's the usage of words that may offend another person given proper context. Society constrains the words we use so that they may have more than one meaning, and so that they may have stronger meanings given context. These constraints are shaped historically by common conflicts, both internal and external. These conflicts are managed, perpetuated, and maintained by religious or governmental persuasion.

In the case of modern "Western" society, much of our culture is defined by the rise and spread of Christianity. The defining characteristic of the Christian philosophy is to "treat other people as you would have them treat you." Somewhere along the way, people figured out that they don't like having swears used against them, and philosophically were bound to view them as taboo to protect the common trust. No one at the time was able to disagree with this sentiment, as the governmental force of the time consisted of "we'll kill you if you get uppity," so the taboo stood.

It wasn't until the second half of the 20th century that we realized our society is shaped by the people that choose to participate therein, rather than the people that society empowers to protect our culture. I consider myself extremely privileged to be able to swear as I see appropriate, view pornography, and even change my body as I see fit. In recompense for this great honor, I show respect to those we've empowered by not telling them what fucking moronic little asswipes they are.

When it comes to nudity, it's a context thing. I know that nudity isn't equivalent to sex, but the first thought that comes into my head when I see a naked person is either "aw dude, gross" or "I hope she doesn't mind me staring as much as I am." This is because I am culturally and biologically stimulated by the bare figure of other humans (specifically physically attractive ladies.) I believe in our ability to tear down these taboos, but the only way to get rid of them is to remove the base instincts at work.
This sums up my thoughts pretty well.
 

Dyme

New member
Nov 18, 2009
498
0
0
Why I am against nudity:
- It is cold without clothes
- it is tradition
- it is polite, if people don't want to see you naked, you just wear clothes. If they want to see you naked you can still take them off.
 

LadyRhian

New member
May 13, 2010
1,245
0
0
SextusMaximus said:
ThreeWords said:
SextusMaximus said:
ThreeWords said:
SextusMaximus said:
BTW Nudity IS NOT EQUAL TO Sex - which probably isn't that bad either [provided it's not sodomy]
I agree in general, except for this exert. Why, if sex is allowable, is gay sex somehow worse?
Zenn3k said:
SextusMaximus said:
(BTW Nudity IS NOT EQUAL TO Sex - which probably isn't that bad either [provided it's not sodomy])

What are your views / arguments?
Hey, whats wrong with sodomy?!

And this doesn't have to be able gay sex either, ask my ex girlfriend.
Wait, not gay Sex, I meant extreme sex, E.G. Rapes and the Copraphilia, etc.
You have a point, but you're using the wrong words. Be more careful next time...
Sodomy is extreme and violent sex, my word was fine, but some major groups have skewed the word in order to make it seem like something else. I'm pretty sure most dictionaries have it down as extreme sex. (or something to those words)
Really? I've always used it, and seen it used to describe anal sex. Laws on the books against Sodomy were put there primarily to criminalize male-male sex. Though men and women can do it as well, it's usually seen as perverted. But primarily, the meaning is Anal sex, no matter what definitions have been grafted on to it later.