Yes this was more my opinion on it, I got annoyed with it because it was redeemable had they just cut out all the bullshit in it, which sadly made up most of it's structure, so I don't know what more there is to say. Yes they keep deliberately effing up sonic, but whatever, the old 2D games are repetitively given spotlight, and you'll have to get your injection of annoying blue hedgehog that way.xxhazyshadowsxx said:I just didn't care for it. It seemed like a pretty boring game to me. There was about roughly 1/3 of Actual Greatness. (All the Levels NOT involving the Werehog)
By OP you mean original poster then no I am not a troll.D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?
How did you come to that conclusion?D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?
He just gave a multitude of reasons why, because it's a terrible game.ShadowDude112 said:I think your missing the point. I'm saying why is it so bashed?balimuzz said:The game was garbage. You spent 1/5 of your time doing fun running bits, and then the rest playing a shitty God of War ripoff and wandering around mission hubs talking to people whose "I'm going to stand in this one spot completely silent until someone comes up nd talks to me" kind of lifelessness would make Blizzard cringe with disgust, and collecting tokens so you can play the five minute pockets of fun.
Because he/she is flaming people when they post their opinions, deliberately insulting them and basically acting in a troll-like manor.joystickjunki3 said:How did you come to that conclusion?D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?
I didn't notice any actual flaming. Honest.D_987 said:Because he/she is flaming people when they post their opinions, deliberately insulting them and basically acting in a troll-like manor.joystickjunki3 said:How did you come to that conclusion?D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?
joystickjunki3 said:I didn't notice any actual flaming. Honest.D_987 said:Because he/she is flaming people when they post their opinions, deliberately insulting them and basically acting in a troll-like manor.joystickjunki3 said:How did you come to that conclusion?D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?
There we go, thats an example of classic flaming, but its more the way he is replying - I'm not going to continue this discussion - after all what I think is a troll may not be what you think one is - regardless, the OP is most certainly acting foolishly, ignoring other peoples opinions and merely focusing entirely on his own unobjectified opinion.ShadowDude112 said:I get it it's your opinion but im just saying all pro reviewers are saying it sucks thats all. Also I don't think "thoes" is a word. You also think I don't get the definition of an opinion but I clearly do your just a retard that has to get his point across no matter what the circumstances.
Those aren't really games, just suck up for cash cows. Foe example you wouldn't call Those baby learning games with Leap Frog actual Games.Tenmar said:Umm there are a lot of BAD Mario games that have been made. They just aren't front cover marketed like the Sonic ones. Watch at your own risk.pimppeter2 said:Cause you know, mario games are good
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/top-ten-screwattack/23547
Fair enough. Just one more thing: opinions don't really need to be objectified, do they?D_987 said:joystickjunki3 said:I didn't notice any actual flaming. Honest.D_987 said:Because he/she is flaming people when they post their opinions, deliberately insulting them and basically acting in a troll-like manor.joystickjunki3 said:How did you come to that conclusion?D_987 said:Do people not realize the OP is a troll?There we go, thats an example of classic flaming, but its more the way he is replying - I'm not going to continue this discussion - after all what I think is a troll may not be what you think one is - regardless, the OP is most certainly acting foolishly, ignoring other peoples opinions and merely focusing entirely on his own unobjectified opinion.ShadowDude112 said:I get it it's your opinion but im just saying all pro reviewers are saying it sucks thats all. Also I don't think "thoes" is a word. You also think I don't get the definition of an opinion but I clearly do your just a retard that has to get his point across no matter what the circumstances.
I feel that, when replying to a subjective disscussion such as this the OP must try to stay objective else the thread turns into a flame war. Regardless of what you might think I feel the vast majority of opinions do not change regardless of argument over the inernet. As such any argument over peoples opinions is meaningless and off-topic. The OP asked "whats wrong with SU" - and a possibe response to that is "its a bad game". Yet the OP will and has attempted to argue otherwise, but did not take an objective approach - rather than attempting to discuss and analyze the reasons why the person felt that way, he/she insulted the person and their source for no obvious reason.joystickjunki3 said:Fair enough. Just one more thing: opinions don't really need to be objectified, do they?
It's more rhetorical than anything, but feel free to respond. Other than that, I'll leave you alone now.
And I can completely dig that. Thanks for the explanation.D_987 said:I feel that, when replying to a subjective disscussion such as this the OP must try to stay objective else the thread turns into a flame war. Regardless of what you might think I feel the vast majority of opinions do not change regardless of argument over the inernet. As such any argument over peoples opinions is meaningless and off-topic. The OP asked "whats wrong with SU" - and a possibe response to that is "its a bad game". Yet the OP will and has attempted to argue otherwise, but did not take an objective approach - rather than attempting to discuss and analyze the reasons why the person felt that way, he/she insulted the person and their source for no obvious reason.joystickjunki3 said:Fair enough. Just one more thing: opinions don't really need to be objectified, do they?
It's more rhetorical than anything, but feel free to respond. Other than that, I'll leave you alone now.
So, yes, I feel for the good of everyone it is best to at least try and view things from an objective viewpoint.