A lot of models are just "more people" to me, but a couple of 'em here and there are just...holy damn...
I'll use Alessandra Ambrosio as my default example.
That woman is just hotter than hell.
I'm well aware of how she looks without makeup.
1st column, 4th row:
fluffybunny937 said:
A lot of models look genuinely weird without their makeup and stuff, but a few of them are genuinely attractive, and some of them almost supernaturally so, like Ms. Ambrosio there.
She looked just as good pregnant (albeit pregnant), and then immediately went back to looking like she did before she had a kid. The worst looking I've ever seen her would still qualify her as attractive. Visually she has barely aged in the last decade. It's kinda insane.
But then the same can be said about the girl I live with (sans baby stuff). She has barely aged since we were 16. She can eat junk food all day long every day, never work out, and never be anything other than size 0. She can not shower for days and then roll out of bed in the morning and still be way more attractive than 99% of women (and I don't just mean in an "attractive to me because I know her" sort of way).
So that's what I think. Models are anything from just some "other people" to "people really lucky in the beauty department", and they get paid for it.
*shrug*
I don't see any reason to complain about them or regard them as some sort of unattainable goal.
They're working with what they were born with, same as Stephen Hawking and Yao Ming, and same as everyone else should.
You can't force yourself to be a smart as Stephen Hawking or as tall as Yao Ming. Yea, women can put themselves through hell trying to approximate a supermodel, but unless they just happen to look that way it's not really gonna work.
Just be who and what you are and min/max the hell out of it.