When Yellowstone Erupts, what is your plan?

Recommended Videos

Zorg Machine

New member
Jul 28, 2008
1,303
0
0
I'm in the middle of a swedish winter (though a fairly mild one this year) so I wouldn't notice if the sun went out.
 

DRes82

New member
Apr 9, 2009
426
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Kopikatsu said:
Anywho, I'll enjoy the time without sun until the horrible death sets in.
There's a plus. Fewer migraines!

...Light is one of my major triggers, so I wear sunglasses almost everywhere.

DRes82 said:
Pretty sure that its overdue for an eruption. Something like regularly every 300,000 years and its been like 320,000.
I love how many numbers we're getting, all of them already false because there is no regular eruption cycle, but with an additional layer because the numbers are likely made up anyway.

The last one was 640,000 years ago, but there's no time table.
That sucks about the light...are you a vampire? I love the sun. So do our plants, which pretty much make up the foundation of our food chain.

I knew I was a little off the mark with that number. Just too lazy this morning to look it up. Also, most of the activity in Yellowstone is attributed by the USGS to geothermic activity, not volcanic activity. That is to say the interaction between water and heat underground produces the pressure observed. The whole 'super volcano' thing is a sensationalist term made up by the same stupid channel that brought you 'ancient aliens'.

Again I'd be more worried about the implications of the bionic arm. hehe.
 

snark

New member
Aug 31, 2008
26
0
0
I'll probably die. Hopefully I'll leave a nice house for the rest of you to loot/ squat in.
 

The Crazy Legs

New member
Nov 11, 2011
66
0
0
Edible Avatar said:
I'm just throwing this out there: Rapture
A underwater city does'nt need to worry about ice ages or ash clouds.
Looking for and hiring overprotecting babysitters
I'm accepting donations to get started XP
Holy shit. That actually makes sense! An underwater city! If only there was some entity out there that would be able to build one if they weren't so busy building million-something dollar cruise missiles every single hour! *Glares at the White House for two minutes*

But, if I hear the news that Yellowstone erupted and there's no way out of that situation: here's my plan: Find the nearest skyscraper, stand on the ledge, and try every kind of drug I haven't tried. If I'm lucky, I'll just OD, but if not, there's always the fall that could do it! Or, I fall the other way and die unconscious by breathing ash in.
 

McMullen

New member
Mar 9, 2010
1,334
0
0
Ed130 said:
McMullen said:
Move to New Zealand. The whole north hemisphere will be various shades of fucked.
You do realise New Zealand is one of the more geological active areas in the world? There is at least one active volcano, the largest city here is built on top of over 40 of them and the country's largest lake was a mountain that blew itself up.
Sure. In fact, I'd consider that a bonus, because volcanoes are a subject of great fascination for me. Indeed, that's partly why I picked it over Australia. I don't see how it would be a problem, as it's unlikely enough for one supervolcanic eruption to occur in anyone's lifetime that I think worrying about a second one would be completely absurd. The nice thing about the southern hemisphere is that it would have less ash and SO2 and more sunlight than the northern hemisphere after yellowstone goes off.
 

Dragonclaw

New member
Dec 24, 2007
448
0
0
Well...I'm in California, so we'll sure as heck take notice, but being among the last affected by any dust cloud I guess I'll just hope that the Westboro Baptist Church was wiped out with the initial "God Hates Volcanoes" blast :p
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,285
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
It'll be fine.

thaluikhain said:
I'll watch the Republican potential candidates blame each other for it, and promise if they are elected, to remove all volcanic activity from the US.
But surely they would be too busy blaming it on Obama, the democrats and a lack of corporate development in Yellowstone to get as far as each other?
Assuming they accept that it has happened at all...
You just reminded me of this:


I'll probably just survive as best I can, The Uk is hopefully far enough away to avoid the worst of the ash clouds, so just stock up on canned supplies, and spend a couple weeks indoors to avoid the ash-rain.
 

kortin

New member
Mar 18, 2011
1,507
0
0
Lol, so much paranoia.

"The U.S. Geological Survey, University of Utah and National Park Service scientists with the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory maintain that they "see no evidence that another such cataclysmic eruption will occur at Yellowstone in the foreseeable future"

If three groups say its most likely not going to erupt in the foreseeable future, then I'm probably going to believe them. Don't worry about it.
 

latiasracer

New member
Jul 7, 2011
480
0
0
RagTagBand said:
Watch it on TV. I live in England so I doubt anybody would even notice an ice age.
Exactly, Hell if we didn't watch the news we probably wouldn't even notice.

It's always grey here in cornwall. Endless, Cold and Grey
 

silversnake4133

New member
Mar 14, 2010
683
0
0
Wait for it to be as disappointing as all of the other "Global Crisises" then laugh at all of the panicky people who hoarded a bunch of crap for nothing. (Unless they were in the vicinity of the blast radius, then I would pray for their safety.) The only natural disaster that wiped out a large chunk of the world's population and started an ice age (that my general knowledge is aware of) was a massive meteor colliding with the planet. That sparked HUNDREDS of eruptions around the world, so I find it kind of hard to believe that one volcano, despite its size, would be able to literally destroy every civilization in the world at once.

Remember the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens in Washington State? Yeah that caused a lot of damage, but the landscape was able to grow back, richer in nutrients even than before the eruption. The size is undoubtedly noticeable in terms of comparison, but the ash eventually dissolved, and Washington State wasn't exactly frozen over in its wake. (And if it were spread across as vast an area as the entire atmospheric surface of the planet, the ash from one volcano probably wouldn't be enough to blot out the sun in every corner of the globe.) Plus during the last ice age, not every creature died, the ones that survived adapted. We can do the same, especially our species because we're logical thinkers and can find ways to adapt in order to survive.

The people who monitor the volcano don't expect it to be anywhere near erupting for at least another 1,000-10,000 years from now, at least for it to be extremely detrimental to the planet's ecosystems. Plus, volcanos usually don't "just erupt" whenever they feel like it. There's usually a build-up and several signs that occur first that would give the people surrounding the area ample notification. Such as earthquakes, smoke, changes in the wildlife patterns, etc.
 

Mathak

The Tax Man Cometh
Mar 27, 2009
432
0
0
Well, seeing as we're statistically overdue (like that means anything) for the next big meteor impact as well, I'll be hedging my bets on the meteor hitting the volcano just as it erupts, thus plugging the hole and saving the world.

3 huzzahs for the meteor!
 

kortin

New member
Mar 18, 2011
1,507
0
0
silversnake4133 said:
Wait for it to be as disappointing as all of the other "Global Crisises" then laugh at all of the panicky people who hoarded a bunch of crap for nothing. (Unless they were in the vicinity of the blast radius, then I would pray for their safety.) The only natural disaster that wiped out a large chunk of the world's population and started an ice age (that my general knowledge is aware of) was a massive meteor colliding with the planet. That sparked HUNDREDS of eruptions around the world, so I find it kind of hard to believe that one volcano, despite its size, would be able to literally destroy every civilization in the world at once.

Remember the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens in Washington State? Yeah that caused a lot of damage, but the landscape was able to grow back, richer in nutrients even than before the eruption. The size is undoubtedly noticeable in terms of comparison, but the ash eventually dissolved, and Washington State wasn't exactly frozen over in its wake. (And if it were spread across as vast an area as the entire atmospheric surface of the planet, the ash from one volcano probably wouldn't be enough to blot out the sun in every corner of the globe.) Plus during the last ice age, not every creature died, the ones that survived adapted. We can do the same, especially our species because we're logical thinkers and can find ways to adapt in order to survive.

The people who monitor the volcano don't expect it to be anywhere near erupting for at least another 1,000-10,000 years from now, at least for it to be extremely detrimental to the planet's ecosystems. Plus, volcanos usually don't "just erupt" whenever they feel like it. There's usually a build-up and several signs that occur first that would give the people surrounding the area ample notification. Such as earthquakes, smoke, changes in the wildlife patterns, etc.
Pretty much what I was trying to say, but waaaay better put.

I have a feeling we're taking the topic a bit too seriously though. xP
 

FernandoV

New member
Dec 12, 2010
575
0
0
Ordinaryundone said:
Be happy I'm not living anywhere near Yellowstone! I think North Carolina is far enough away that we'll escape the worst of it. If it gets too bad, I could get on a boat and head East, or south to the Caribbean.
Except for the whole "Ash covering the sun thing and polluting your drinking water and making it difficult to breathe oxygen" thing, yea, you should be fine.
 

Jowe

New member
May 26, 2010
86
0
0
Well the MAIN problem is going to be the collapse of infrastructure and food growth for a year or so, about 90% of the population CANNOT be supported without the regular deliveries from other countries of food, toys and fuel etc. The massive reduction in fuel and other goods would lead to drastic reductions in the amount of good deliveries to supermarkets, leading to a slow death for most of the population.

Instead of asking yourself, what will I do to ensure my survival for the first couple of weeks, ask yourself, where will my next meal this time next year come from?
 

Ed_Fox

New member
Jan 27, 2010
31
0
0
It is entirely possible that there would be very little long term impact from such an eruption. The Toba eruption about 70,000 years ago was one of the largest eruptions of the Quaternary (from 2.5 mya to present), and has been linked with climate change and seen as the trigger for the penultimate ice age (Marine Isotope Stage 4). However, sedimentation analysis of the Toba ash in the context of climate indicators suggest that there was approximately 1,000 years of an interstadial event (warm bits between glacial events) after the eruption. (Schulz, H., Emeis, K. C., Erlenkeuser, H., von Rad, U. And Rolf, C. 2002. The Toba Volcanic Event and Interstadial/Stadial Climates at the Marine Isotopic Stage 5 to 4 Transition in the Northern Indian Ocean. Quaternary Research 57:22-31.).
 

Steinar Valsson

New member
Aug 28, 2010
135
0
0
It won't be as devastating as the fear-lovers make it out to be. At worst it will cause a "nuclear winter" for a year or so. In a modern society it's very manageable. But it won't have any world-ebdubg-type-esk affects.