As a father ill put it this way...I rather have a guy/girl get there jollys off to a drawn picture of my daughter then for them to have no place to vent there urges and which makes them kidnap my daughter and well you know...
Wait, what? You think it's OK to masturbate over children, real or not, it's still a child?NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
Then you should call the police because ive murdered thousands of innocent pixles in video gamesFamoFunk said:If it's a drawn pornagraphic of children it's still wrong.
Why would you want to draw images of children in that situation for? Pretty fucked up if you ask me.
Ehh I wouldnt go around telling people that...people are very stupid about loliNameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
It's not really wrong to depict reality. A movie about sexual abuse of children and the immensely damaging effects it can have on them could be artistically justified in showing the abuse in all its repulsive cruelty, to help get its message across.Danish rage said:...
Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
NameIsRobertPaulson said:Umm, what does that have to do with pornographic images?EinTheCorgi said:Then you should call the police because ive murdered thousands of innocent pixles in video gamesFamoFunk said:If it's a drawn pornagraphic of children it's still wrong.
Why would you want to draw images of children in that situation for? Pretty fucked up if you ask me.
*Dails 999 anyway*
Why what makes children so untouchable? Why cant I blow them up with my fat man in fallout3 or cut there little heads off with my sword in fable...give me one good reason why kids should be protected from every thing adults go though...we all live in the same world. and the day that we start treating children like equals instead of pets will be a day where humanity moves forward.Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
And your perfectly fine with what amounts to a witch hunt to put us away for owning loli art?Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
As a Mother I'd rather no one get their jollys off to my underage child. Drawing/photo/real life.EinTheCorgi said:As a father ill put it this way...I rather have a guy/girl get there jollys off to a drawn picture of my daughter then for them to have no place to vent there urges and which makes them kidnap my daughter and well you know...
This actually gave me the chills. :-(EinTheCorgi said:Why what makes children so untouchable? Why cant I blow them up with my fat man in fallout3 or cut there little heads off with my sword in fable...give me one good reason why kids should be protected from every thing adults go though...we all live in the same world. and the day that we start treating children like equals instead of pets will be a day where humanity moves forward.Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
Sure, in my mind it´s child pornografy, try and keep that in mind please.RedEyesBlackGamer said:And your perfectly fine with what amounts to a witch hunt to put us away for owning loli art?Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
Umm, it's impossile to treat Children as Adults, seeing as they're not mentally and physically developed like us. Plus, it's our job as parents/siblings/good fucking people to look after and out for them.EinTheCorgi said:Why what makes children so untouchable? Why cant I blow them up with my fat man in fallout3 or cut there little heads off with my sword in fable...give me one good reason why kids should be protected from every thing adults go though...we all live in the same world. and the day that we start treating children like equals instead of pets will be a day where humanity moves forward.Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.
Nope. You can kill/mutilate/torture imaginary people all you want. But you wank to an imaginary anime image of a 13 year old girl? Go to prison you creepy bastard!EinTheCorgi said:the way I simply see it is that we live in reality "A" and anime/video games are reality "B"
Reality "A" has real people. reality "B" dosnt so When Im in reality "B" i want to be able to kill,steal,rape,blow up what ever and who ever i feel like...because if im not allowed to do that in reality "B" then i may just have to do it in reality "A" and no one wants that.
Nooo, you can go ahead and find animated pictures arousing, thats ok. It´s the child part that´s not. I just don´t understand WHY they must be of children? WHY?NameIsRobertPaulson said:But it is that kind of view that creates a hostile and negative area for people like me, who do not wish to harm children, but find animated drawings arousing. It is the same argument I hear all the time that "I don't hate gays, but I don't feel they should have equal rights". It is using your morals to persecute others.Danish rage said:Sure, in my mind it´s child pornografy, try and keep that in mind please.RedEyesBlackGamer said:And your perfectly fine with what amounts to a witch hunt to put us away for owning loli art?Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.