Where will the next war be?

Recommended Videos

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
Ok so Afganistan looks like it has nearly ran its course in popular media and the TV cameras will soon be packing up and looking for somewhere new to film.

Where do you think the next war/"war"/police action will take place?

and i mean interesting ones, not a tribal/gang war in South America or Africa.

Posibilites:

Argentina V UK part 2 over the Falklands

North Korea V World Police

India V Pakistan

Bosnia V Serbia part 2

Turkey V Iraq

Iran V World Police


can't think of any others that has a realistic chance, personally I think Bosnia V Serbia part 2 is most likely (until Republicans get back into the White House that is, then Iran/North Korea need to watch the fuck out!), outside bet on Argentina doing some posturing maybe?
 
Sep 9, 2010
1,597
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
USA vs Pakistan, then Palestine, then the whole bloody Middle East.
It'sd Israel now... Not Palestine. But I agree with the Middle East. Peace talks are probably gonna go no where, because of mutual hate on both sides. And it will result in fighting. My money is on Israel winning (again)
 

JochemDude

New member
Nov 23, 2010
1,242
0
0
USA vs China
cause if north-korea is gonna start shit with south-korea The USA have already said to support south-korea and china has done the same for north-korea
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,075
0
0
USA V itself. Last time America was this divided and rancorous, someone took a potshot at Fort Sumter and all hell broke loose.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
I suspect it will either be US vs. N Korea, or US vs. Iran. The US has been foaming at the mouth over these two countries for almost a decade and the war in Iraq is pretty compelling evidence that they aren't afraid to start a war for no reason.
 

AssassinJoe

New member
Oct 1, 2010
625
0
0
Iran........no question.

Hell they're practically giving the rest of the world the middle finger.
 

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
spartan231490 said:
I suspect it will either be US vs. N Korea, or US vs. Iran. The US has been foaming at the mouth over these two countries for almost a decade and the war in Iraq is pretty compelling evidence that they aren't afraid to start a war for no reason.
But to be fair both these countries have a big and nuclear bite.

The US military like to only bully little nations with no modern military power, like Korea and Vietnam

I KID I KID!

Iran and NK will never develop into a ground war, its pretty much MAD, maybe missile strikes against targets but no one will ever fuck with a country that had either fresh nukes, or a shed full of ex-soviet ones
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,074
0
0
JochemDude said:
USA vs China
cause if north-korea is gonna start shit with south-korea The USA have already said to support south-korea and china has done the same for north-korea
Not since their economy started depending on ours. Given the choice of continued prosperity or getting in a long drawn out and bloody war just to support a tiny crack pot nation that doesn't give them shit. What are they going to choose?

That said North Korea sure has been trying to start something recently. I would not be surprised if something broke out there.

lostzombies.com said:
AssassinJoe said:
Iran........no question.

Hell they're practically giving the rest of the world the middle finger.
but doing it from behind a wall made from ex-soviet nukes lol
You do realize that Iran does not actually posses any nuclear weapons yet right? Russia may have helped them a bit but they wouldn't go that far.
 

lostzombies.com

New member
Apr 26, 2010
812
0
0
Canid117 said:
You do realize that Iran does not actually posses any nuclear weapons yet right? Russia may have helped them a bit but they wouldn't go that far.
Have you any idea of how many nukes vanished when the Soviet Union broke up?

Sure they may not have the ability to launch them but you can bet your bottom dollar that Iran and NK have warheads sitting around in a bunker somewhere.

Why do you think there has been no attack or strikes against either of them, all the while Iraq got pummelled for years just for not letting weapons inspectors have a look around and invaded TWICE! lol seriously why else do you think neither nations have not even had a fart directed in ther general direction when both had developed nuclear reactors and fired off ballisitic missile tests, yet Iraq was invaded (2nd time) for relatively nothing at all.

It's also why the US and NATO has suddenly started making the new missile shield in Europe which everyone had previously let die in the dust, now when that is up and running then maybe, but even then it's a small chance.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,074
0
0
lostzombies.com said:
Canid117 said:
You do realize that Iran does not actually posses any nuclear weapons yet right? Russia may have helped them a bit but they wouldn't go that far.
Have you any idea of how many nukes vanished when the Soviet Union broke up?

Sure they may not have the ability to launch them but you can bet your bottom dollar that Iran and NK have warheads sitting around in a bunker somewhere.

Why do you think there has been no attack or strikes against either of them, all the while Iraq got pummelled for years just for not letting weapons inspectors have a look around and invaded TWICE! lol seriously why else do you think neither nations have not even had a fart directed in ther general direction when both had developed nuclear reactors and fired off ballisitic missile tests, yet Iraq was invaded (2nd time) for relatively nothing at all.

It's also why the US and NATO has suddenly started making the new missile shield in Europe which everyone had previously let die in the dust, now when that is up and running then maybe, but even then it's a small chance.
You have yourself some crazy conspiracy theory's there but I suppose I have heard worse. The reason an invasion hasn't been attempted against Iran is because the American public wasn't willing to swallow the "WMD's" shit again that led to Iraq which was a PR nightmare of a war. The American public is currently not willing to go to war with Iran because it would get bogged down worse than Iraq and everyone is tired of extremely expensive wars with no visible end and no one wants to invade North Korea because they actually do have Nuclear weapons and they haven't pushed the line far enough to risk watching a few million south Koreans die of the truly horrific effects of Nuclear fire. NKorea probably would have been a better choice to attack in the early 2000s but the Hawks couldn't find a way to tie them to Terrorism and certain individuals in the government (hint: the president) had a personal grudge against Iraq. (Saddam Hussein tried to assassinate George Bush Sr if you will recall.) As for your little "Nuclear weapons were lost!" argument I could use that same faulty line of reasoning to say that my cousin Jim has a vast nuclear arsenal and that is why none of the major powers have tried to invade his apartment. Soviet nuclear weapons were not lost so much as in the possession of various nation states that were once part of the union but broke off. Iran never possessed such weapons as they were never a satellite state or part of the Soviet Union. All of those nuclear weapons have since been transferred to the Russian Federation and are most likely among the 30,000 nuclear warheads that they have since disarmed.
 

Anarchy In Detroit

New member
May 26, 2008
386
0
0
Korea. The Balkans? Come on they barely count.

Yessir, I think Korea is going to brew something stupid up sooner or later.
 

Kitteh

New member
Mar 31, 2010
451
0
0
koreas about to get bloody. irans an asshole, but they're not that dumb. n. korea might be that dumb.