Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

Mechsoap

New member
Apr 4, 2010
2,129
0
0
Iceland, we don't even got a military, and guns are illegal (or maybe we are just planning your doom).
 

JimmyC99

New member
Jul 7, 2010
214
0
0
Costa Rica, doesn't have an army and its constitution forbids forming one, it is the location of the UN's University of Peace.
 

raikounen

New member
Sep 8, 2010
43
0
0
I would go with my own land, Norway. But then again we have shit tons of oil, and oil often = war.
After that I would say The Vatican State, but they have religion and are therefore only one crazy pope away from genocide. (And I am not implying that I think it will happen, but it could happen. No offence meant.)
So I'll go for Andorra, which I believe is the smallest country in the world.
 

Yan Hunt

New member
Oct 23, 2010
19
0
0
England - we won't start it, but we'll no doubt have to fight it, win it, sigh sadly while america has its mission complete party way way too early, and then clear up the mess afterwards.
 

Ramare

New member
Apr 27, 2009
266
0
0
King Toasty said:
OH! I bet AMERICA will be the LEAST likely to start WWIII.

In all seriousness, and fear of my own country's stupidity, I'm jumping on the bandwagon saying Switzerland will be the least likely to start it.

Although Canada would be a close second. Although if WWIII does happen, I'm moving there. That place is really cold, and, if you know what you're doing, you can lead your enemies on a merry goose chase through the bush without even being in the general area.

On an unrelated note, these ginger snaps are oh so delicious.
 

Srdjan

New member
Mar 12, 2010
693
0
0
Germany, they started enough already, they will likely pass the honour to someone else.
 

captaincabbage

New member
Apr 8, 2010
3,149
0
0
SimuLord said:
My money's on Lesotho. Hard to start WW3 when nobody in the world has heard of you (and, with a >30% adult HIV prevalence, hard to find enough guys to field a soccer team, never mind an army.)
either them, or the Principality of Sealand. It's an old oil rig type thingy owned by this one guy and his family off the coast of England, just in international waters and it's pretty fucking awesome admittedly. If I was rich, I'd build something like that, but I'd build it in Australian waters about a kilometre from the shore just off the coast of Victoria, and I'd make it a huge as shit mansion. :D
 

Crazycat690

New member
Aug 31, 2009
677
0
0
I say Finland, the only ones we fight are each other, and since some wihizzle something said Finland is the best country in the world, to live in and so on, we really have no reason, plus our current female president Tarja Halonen looks like Conan O'Brian so that makes your arguement invalid.

FINLAND FTW!!! (That is in if it get involved in an conflict)
 

Tom Phoenix

New member
Mar 28, 2009
1,161
0
0
I don't know. Swaziland? Andorra? Gineau-Bissau?

I love it how this entire thread is one enormous geography class. XD