Yeah, this is what i'm talking about.Ren3004 said:
No you haven't. Why would you care about the thoughts of idiots?DaWaffledude said:People think Europe is one country? I have lost all faith in humanity.
HOLY SHIT?!Ren3004 said:As an European, the one that Europe is a big country... It's just... urgh...I mean, come on, it's 3rd grade geography!
Oh, this seems relevant to this discussion:
THIS is my biggest pet peeve. Jesus Christ dude. Please go back and READ his goddamn post and explain where you drew any of your conclusions about him.icaritos said:Ahhh let me guess, another one who votes conservative simply because of issues like abortion while ignoring their extreme corporatism, refusal to increase taxes under the crisis, destruction of the social services and social nets as well as pushing for the commercialization of every governmental sector.wammnebu said:what do you mean by butchering? Taxes, healthcare?icaritos said:Just wondering (please don't take this personally or as a means of offense), but how do you rationalize the consistent butchering of the middle to lower class? If I understood this it would go a LOOOONG way in allowing me to see them with more respect, it is kind of difficult at the moment.wammnebu said:that all american conservatives are rush limbaugh imbecilles, some of us are actually fairly sane individuals,
I dont understand the question, i dont remember many machetes during the last march for life
You do know they don't care about issues like abortion at all right? When they were in power there wasn't a single bill passed or suggested to address the matter, they just pick the rhetoric up in between presidential sections to harness votes, then promptly forget it exists.
Still you haven't answered my question.How do you rationalize all they are doing? Look at the U.S., salaries for middle and lower class have remained stagnant for 30 years while the top 5% flourish, the worst health care and public transport of all the developed nations and every single legislation passed is done with disregard to the middle to lower classes (ban obamacare, support for removal of minimum wage, the Wisconsin fiasco, cuts to science and arts departments, citizens united ruling,endless war support with the exception of people like Ron Paul, etc).
Neither annoy me, and as for Europe, it is only a matter of time now that most of it uses the same currency.bdcjacko said:I don't feel like adding a poll, just starting a discussion.
Anyhow, which misconception annoys you more, the fact that some people think Europe is all one big country or the that some people think or don't realize laws vary state to state in America?
Both get on my nerves when I am having a discussion where those are relevant. And they are somewhat connected and usually are in conversations about why are Americans/Europeans like this or that.
*please stop quoting this, talk amongst yourselves, I have lost interest
When he said march for life what other implication am I to draw upon other than the pro-life vs pro-choice debacle. If you don't want to be misunderstood you should make an effort to present your point as clearly as possible.The Bandit said:THIS is my biggest pet peeve. Jesus Christ dude. Please go back and READ his goddamn post and explain where you drew any of your conclusions about him.icaritos said:Ahhh let me guess, another one who votes conservative simply because of issues like abortion while ignoring their extreme corporatism, refusal to increase taxes under the crisis, destruction of the social services and social nets as well as pushing for the commercialization of every governmental sector.wammnebu said:what do you mean by butchering? Taxes, healthcare?icaritos said:Just wondering (please don't take this personally or as a means of offense), but how do you rationalize the consistent butchering of the middle to lower class? If I understood this it would go a LOOOONG way in allowing me to see them with more respect, it is kind of difficult at the moment.wammnebu said:that all american conservatives are rush limbaugh imbecilles, some of us are actually fairly sane individuals,
I dont understand the question, i dont remember many machetes during the last march for life
You do know they don't care about issues like abortion at all right? When they were in power there wasn't a single bill passed or suggested to address the matter, they just pick the rhetoric up in between presidential sections to harness votes, then promptly forget it exists.
Still you haven't answered my question.How do you rationalize all they are doing? Look at the U.S., salaries for middle and lower class have remained stagnant for 30 years while the top 5% flourish, the worst health care and public transport of all the developed nations and every single legislation passed is done with disregard to the middle to lower classes (ban obamacare, support for removal of minimum wage, the Wisconsin fiasco, cuts to science and arts departments, citizens united ruling,endless war support with the exception of people like Ron Paul, etc).
And "Still, you haven't answered my question?" Are you joking? You're joking right? Please, please tell me I just got uber trolled.
i dont see how ignorance = stupidity care to explain plz.sinterklaas said:An ignorant person is stupid, an uneducated person does not necessarily have to be stupid.zehydra said:For me, I'd have to say the misconception that Ignorance/Education has anything to do with intellectual ability.
An uneducated/ignorant person isn't necessarily stupid, it would be a mistake to assume so.
I hate people that don't think for themselves.
What's even worse is people not acknowledging that there are Latin Americans that are not from Mexico. There are some incorrigible people who, despite my constant assertions, believe that Guatemala is just another part of Mexico. ¿Que ondas, voz? ¡Soy chapin!DJ_DEnM said:Mexican's are dark skinned, have sombreros, ponchos and yell "Ole!".
We're normal people. Why can't you F***ing understand that.
You mean exactly what you are doing?Wicky_42 said:Yes, you can, but it's inherently less accurate to refer to the CONTINENT than to the country.bdcjacko said:I see your point. But New York City is no more an accurate representation of America than Rome is of Europe. So again, if a European who has only been to a very small part of America can say they have been to America (which they can), then if some American goes to London, they have in the same respect been to Europe.Wicky_42 said:Though you have to realise that, as America is a single country, you can say you've been to America and be accurate (well, I guess it'd really be "the United States", as opposed to "North America", the continent equivalent to "Europe") - your comparison is more like saying "I've been to Italy", when you've actually been to the Tuscan region of said country opposed against a European saying "I've been to North America", which holds a few countries before you start dealing with regional boundaries.![]()
"We got ways of making you pronounce the letter O"conithegreat said:That canadians say about "aboot" I have been all over Canada and I have never heard a Canadian say "aboot"
Yes. Because clearly "America" there isn't a casual reference to the USA but intended to take into account all of the countries, regions and both continents that take the name. Or do you think that the US is a continent?Canid117 said:You mean exactly what you are doing?Wicky_42 said:Yes, you can, but it's inherently less accurate to refer to the CONTINENT than to the country.bdcjacko said:I see your point. But New York City is no more an accurate representation of America than Rome is of Europe. So again, if a European who has only been to a very small part of America can say they have been to America (which they can), then if some American goes to London, they have in the same respect been to Europe.Wicky_42 said:Though you have to realise that, as America is a single country, you can say you've been to America and be accurate (well, I guess it'd really be "the United States", as opposed to "North America", the continent equivalent to "Europe") - your comparison is more like saying "I've been to Italy", when you've actually been to the Tuscan region of said country opposed against a European saying "I've been to North America", which holds a few countries before you start dealing with regional boundaries.![]()
No there just happen to be two American continents and you could potentially be referring to any country within either one of those continents or both continents as a whole when you just say America. Its like the Europe situation. Only worse.Wicky_42 said:Yes. Because clearly "America" there isn't a casual reference to the USA but intended to take into account all of the countries, regions and both continents that take the name. Or do you think that the US is a continent?Canid117 said:You mean exactly what you are doing?Wicky_42 said:Yes, you can, but it's inherently less accurate to refer to the CONTINENT than to the country.bdcjacko said:I see your point. But New York City is no more an accurate representation of America than Rome is of Europe. So again, if a European who has only been to a very small part of America can say they have been to America (which they can), then if some American goes to London, they have in the same respect been to Europe.Wicky_42 said:Though you have to realise that, as America is a single country, you can say you've been to America and be accurate (well, I guess it'd really be "the United States", as opposed to "North America", the continent equivalent to "Europe") - your comparison is more like saying "I've been to Italy", when you've actually been to the Tuscan region of said country opposed against a European saying "I've been to North America", which holds a few countries before you start dealing with regional boundaries.![]()