http://i.imgur.com/TqYBaSr.png
Welp, this thread has turned out exactly as I expected it to. Grey, I recommend you send the mods a personal apology, they sure deserve it.
The White Guilt-trip is always my favorite part.Phrozenflame500 said:Welp, this thread has turned out exactly as I expected it to. Grey, I recommend you send the mods a personal apology, they sure deserve it.
Well that part of the comic is at the beginning of the end of a conversation I'd imagine went like this:Machine Man 1992 said:Snip
I'd like to ask, why ask the question of why not make a character black if you aren't fishing for a shitstorm? There's no way to answer a loaded question like that without looking like a racist.
In fact it was Trilligan that caused me to have Maiev/Boudica suspicions in the first place. Where you see one you're guaranteed to see the other.DugMachine said:Looks like Trilligan is back as well. The tag team duo has returned for round 2. Getting my pop corn readyanthony87 said:I know right?DugMachine said:Alright there's no way you're not Boudica, just admit it.Maiev Shadowsong said:snip
I said the same thing in another thread.
Harassment? The guy didn't say a goddamn word to him.Spot1990 said:harassment, intimidation, stalking. Yes actually, following someone around can be classed as a couple of different crimes.Hazy said:As it stands, he didn't do anything unlawful by following him around. In addition, he was trying to find the address he was going to, and give to the police.Spot1990 said:No. It really isn't. It's his job to report suspicious people to the police.Hazy said:Following a suspicious person is "provoking a confrontation" now? Come on, Funk, The guy was Captain of the neighborhood watch - it was his job to follow people he suspected were up to no good.
Actually, Most Neighborhood watches are a.) volunteer and unpaid and b.) only duties are to keep an eye out and alert the police. Time and time again, police will tell anyone who is in the neighborhood watch that they are not empowered to fight crime or uphold justice. The police say this because it's true and because someone can get seriously hurt. And Lo and behold, someone was.Hazy said:Following a suspicious person is "provoking a confrontation" now? Come on, Funk, The guy was Captain of the neighborhood watch - it was his job to follow people he suspected were up to no good. Had a crime been committed, his ass would have been on the chopping block for negligence.John Funk said:(Also, the only reason Trayvon was fighting him was because George Zimmerman was stalking him and in doing so provoked a confrontation, winning a fight isn't a capital crime.)
You can call it racial profiling all you want, but they could be any color - it's simple human nature to be wary around people who look suspicious.
And let's not forget that Martin wasn't the perfect angel that news outlets made him out to be.
Eh. I don't know. I kind of winced. Not because it hit home, but because I knew I'd see at least a few people defending Zimmerman again in the thread. Lo and behold I did. A joke that supposedly lampoons a serious topic that just exacerbates the still festering wound isn't really a good thing.jmarquiso said:You ... you ... managed a Trayvon Martin joke without it being too offensive... you.. I don't know... I don't know...
Oh, I'll agree with the funding thing. We've had triple A companies having to fight to keep their protagonist women, or even keep more focus on women other than 'Lol, while you're shooting you can look at these boobs'.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Probably because they don't have the time, funding or talent, although I see your point.jluzar20 said:If people are crying out for more diversity, why not make your own game with whatever character you want instead of getting into pointless internet arguments or producing bad webcomics?
Do yourself a favor. Type in Traycoon in google. See the responses from white people, even if he was mixed race. How a lot of people who have hate in their hearts embrace him for 'doing the world a favor'.Dead Century said:Well, I laughed at the Alpha Omega Beta bit. As for Zimmerman, it's not that simple.
First off, Zimmerman isn't white. He's mixed race, leaning towards hispanic. Just saying.
This debate has been done before:Spot1990 said:harassment, intimidation, stalking. Yes actually, following someone around can be classed as a couple of different crimes.Hazy said:As it stands, he didn't do anything unlawful by following him around. In addition, he was trying to find the address he was going to, and give to the police.Spot1990 said:No. It really isn't. It's his job to report suspicious people to the police.Hazy said:Following a suspicious person is "provoking a confrontation" now? Come on, Funk, The guy was Captain of the neighborhood watch - it was his job to follow people he suspected were up to no good.
You are correct here, I should have said that it wasn't offensive to ME, and I'm also a POC, just not in the affected group in this situation so I may have been insensitive there. I apologize.ObsidianJones said:Eh. I don't know. I kind of winced. Not because it hit home, but because I knew I'd see at least a few people defending Zimmerman again in the thread. Lo and behold I did. A joke that supposedly lampoons a serious topic that just exacerbates the still festering wound isn't really a good thing.jmarquiso said:You ... you ... managed a Trayvon Martin joke without it being too offensive... you.. I don't know... I don't know...
True, I edited my initial post.ObsidianJones said:Actually, Most Neighborhood watches are a.) volunteer and unpaid and b.) only duties are to keep an eye out and alert the police. Time and time again, police will tell anyone who is in the neighborhood watch that they are not empowered to fight crime or uphold justice. The police say this because it's true and because someone can get seriously hurt. And Lo and behold, someone was.
He shot him only after Trayvon started assaulting him, so you claim about "shooting him because he looked suspicious" is complete and utter nonsense.And frankly, is being a perfect angel the only way that one can feel that it's a crime to have someone's life taken? If we go to the things on record, Zimmerman fought his friends, possibly his wife, and had other incidents. Am I or you ok'ed with taking out a gun and shooting him because he looks suspicious?
Again, see above, that wasn't the focal point of this argument - it was meant to level the playing field, and set the record straight that Martin was not just a regular, run of the mill kid.It's not relevant what you did in the past, because I have no way of knowing. As no one else does unless they've been stalking someone for quite some time. If you're suspicious now, and I attack you now, I can't use what you did in the past to feel validated. That hasn't been legal with the police for a long time now, so it's definitely not legal for us.
And what is it, pray tell? I'm dying to know.Spot1990 said:There's a difference between between "going the same direction as someone" and following them. I know this, you know this, don't play dumb.Hazy said:Harassment? The guy didn't say a goddamn word to him.Spot1990 said:harassment, intimidation, stalking. Yes actually, following someone around can be classed as a couple of different crimes.Hazy said:As it stands, he didn't do anything unlawful by following him around. In addition, he was trying to find the address he was going to, and give to the police.Spot1990 said:No. It really isn't. It's his job to report suspicious people to the police.Hazy said:Following a suspicious person is "provoking a confrontation" now? Come on, Funk, The guy was Captain of the neighborhood watch - it was his job to follow people he suspected were up to no good.
Intimidation? Are you serious? Martin was 6 foot something and jacked from playing Football. If you think he was intimidated by a middle-aged man, you're delusional.
Stalking? Again, splitting hairs. If following someone down the street is stalking, I should be in handcuffs by the time I finish my neighborhood walks.
Do you mean following them when they don't know you're there? Say I'm following someone in the hallways of school, and they don't realize I'm behind them - is that harassment too?Again you don't have to say anything to anyone to harass them, following them is harassment.
How do we know his intent was the threaten him at all? He didn't say a single word to him. Typically when someone trys to threaten another, they make their presence known.And intimidation doesn't require the target actually be intimidated. If a guy half my size threatens me, whether I feel threatened or not, his intent is still to threaten me, it's still harassment, it's still a crime.