I think you just proved his point ironically. One, you assert that women should be treated special just because they are women. Not because you should act kindly towards all people, regardless of sex, race or creed. Second, you then state that if a woman on the internet declares she is a woman, which is merely a fact which could lend itself to aiding her experiences that help support her position she is defending, then she deserves whatever attention she gets, good or bad.TimeLord said:So you would rather men didn't treat women decently and act like a nice person? Maybe I'm just old fashoned in thinking that chivalry is a good thing compared to youngsters and their MP3s and their internets these days. Obvious irony is obviousMontezuma said:White Knight Syndrome
n. A personality characteristic found in most males that lead them to:
.
.
.
3. Follow the dying code of chivalry and generally act like a nice guy.
That's all very well and on the whole I agree with the fact that women can be treated poorly on the internet, when they are singled out, because they are women but on the occasion that a female storms onto the internet and says "LOOOK! I am a woman!!11" then they are going to get attention and they know it. At that point they have no right to complain.TLDR: Do not defend someone because they are a woman, defend someone because they are a person.
Yes, I understand that you mean when a woman says something along the lines of "I'm a woman so therefore I'm right" which would be just as ridiculous for a man to argue, but still you're entire is sexist. It's just the type of sexist that's okay in society still.