Who the hell thought THAT was a good idea?

Recommended Videos

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
3,283
2,501
118
Country
The Netherlands
tippy2k2 said:
TheMigrantSoldier said:
Fire Emblem Awakening. Who the hell thought it was a good idea for the game to pull out unpredictable enemy reinforcements AND have them move on the same turn?
A-freaking-men to this one. Every time I bring it up, I feel like I played a different game because big fans state how it always tells you where and when it's going to happen.

No...no it does not. I know the game is supposed to be some sacred RPG but it's OK to say that your game has flaws and that's a gigantic freaking flaw that, in my ever so humble opinion, is a big reason why Awakening was one of the weakest Fire Emblem games I've played.
I wouldn't say Awakening is considered a sacred game by any means. Most of the Fire Emblem fanbase seems to actively despise the game. Perhaps it worsened due to Fates taking a lot of new ideas and expanding on them in ways that are undesirable. Examples are the fanservice introduced there paving the way for the creepy skinship feature I mentioned, and taking over the children system without it tying into the plot, leaving the game with half a roster of kid units that are either ridiculously uninvolved in the plot or very close to being non canon....oh and without the time travel to justify it there is little room to deny that yes, 12 year old girls CAN now get pregnant and have children and yes, that woman in her late twenties CAN get pregnant from a shota aged kid. Also incest...loooots of incest though Fire Emblem isn't particularly unfamiliar with that one.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
15,016
2,676
118
Hades said:
I wouldn't say Awakening is considered a sacred game by any means. Most of the Fire Emblem fanbase seems to actively despise the game..
Huh...maybe it's just been my luck or maybe it's just a confirmation bias thing cause all I ever seem to hear about Awakening is that it's a must have for the 3DS and FE fans.

It is nice to know I'm not the only one who thought it wasn't all that good :D
 

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
3,283
2,501
118
Country
The Netherlands
tippy2k2 said:
Hades said:
I wouldn't say Awakening is considered a sacred game by any means. Most of the Fire Emblem fanbase seems to actively despise the game..
Huh...maybe it's just been my luck or maybe it's just a confirmation bias thing cause all I ever seem to hear about Awakening is that it's a must have for the 3DS and FE fans.

It is nice to know I'm not the only one who thought it wasn't all that good :D
People who played Awakening as their first Fire emblem seems to like it the most while the ones who played its predecessor are seeing the series take one step back and one step forward into anime fanservice territory.

I'm personally somewhere in the middle of it. I think Awakening is a good game in its own right but worse then many other Fire Emblems. It tried some new things, some of which worked and others fell flat. The story was somewhat crap but the characters likable, if to comfortable in their archtypes.
 

KarmaTheAlligator

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,472
0
0
CrimsonBlaze said:
I've got two: one not so bad and another with all of the bad.

1.) Every game after Disgaea 2 in the series

Why did they take away the Master-Student skill learning mechanic in the later titles? Heck, Disgaea 3 is based on a classroom/school setting; I couldn't think of a better setting for that mechanic. I guess that it was taken out to deal away with some balancing issues with combat in order to prevent certain characters from being TOO powerful, but this is precisely why I love Disgaea 2: most of my main units could heal on the fly, Rozalin tripled as a Gunner, Mage, and Healer, my Fire Skull and Fire Mage knew all the magic skills, and I could actually beat the game with the story related characters (yes, even Tink) without breaking triple digits in the level department.
Then you didn't play Disgaea D2? That system is back, and made in such a way that you can end up with a big loop of masters and apprentices so that everyone can learn everything (it even allows you to get the weapon skills early).
 

pookie101

New member
Jul 5, 2015
1,162
0
0
not a game i play personally but have to put up with it.. "fishing planet" a relative plays it and a very loud screeching bird noise plays on one of the maps every 10 seconds :-| i want that entire species to go extinct now
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,737
0
0
This topic again? :D

Oh so many.

--

Rune factory frontier

I've ranted about the Runey system in enough threads already, but here's the skinny.

Why would anyone, in a farming/dungeon crawler hybrid that spun off from harvest moon, insert a time-consuming mechanic where you have to babysit this stupid food chain and micromanage it with shitty tools and require a detour just to see how the food chain is behaving, and then punish the player with not being able to grow a goddamn thing if they let the food chain fail, while also making it so that if they game the system to make it less tedious, you reward them by making their crops grow so fast it breaks the game?

WHY?!? It ruined an otherwise perfect game for me! ;_;

--

Shadow the hedgehog

Why are vehicles so slow and worthless? At least let me vault off my bike like in the intro and watch it blow up whatever it hits!

Why is the dialogue and plot so worthless?! Why are the swear words totally unnatural?! WHY?!

Why are melee weapons so worthless? Why do they have like 6 hits of durability, hit so slow, do so little damage (outside of the unlockable katana) and why can't I swing them while running/skating which would give them some utility?

There was a good game in here, but so many questionable decisions render it a severely handicapped game. :(

--

Of orcs and men

Ok, I love this game, the story, the upgrade mechanics, and the many design questions is brings up.

But why the hell would you design the game in a way that makes it very beneficial to customize the Orc into a tank and the Goblin a total glass cannon, make the whole game about using the two of them in combat to combo together, and then give us a fight where we only have control over the goblin, against 2 tough melee enemies and a mage who can potentially force-choke us from across the room for a quarter of our health while stunning us, while the other two guys gut us while we're stunned by the spell?!

And WHY would your final boss not only involve an overpowered mage guy who can force choke HALF THE TANK'S HP, and then also throw in endlessly respawning tanky enemies to deal with?!

If you drop down to Easy Mode, the final battle is doable enough. But doing it on Medium is ridiculous.

--

Styx Master of Shadows: *being vague about it so not to spoil it*

Would someone explain to me how it's possible to make an absolutely FANTASTIC stealth game about using your environment to the fullest in order to gain an advantage, and then completely screw up everything that makes the formula work during the final boss? ESPECIALLY when you already had an epic confrontation with the same villain earlier in the game that only failed to stick due to plot reasons?

Seriously, the first encounter with the ultimate villain is awesome. You stalk them around an area they know very well, and try to ambush them, with them being able to predict each of your attacks, and thus evade death. And you can't afford to get caught since they'll kick your ass in straight combat. It's an amazing cat-and-mouse segment using shadows, hidey-holes in the walls and wooden support beams up on the ceiling to gank from as you try to wear them down until they make a mistake.

The final boss? Welp, one small circular arena with 3 small pieces of cover to hide in, with 3 patrolling weaklings that patrol RANDOMLY, so it's impossible to gank more than one before they all swarm you and murder you horribly, since getting caught and forced to fight when more than 1 enemy is attacking you is a death sentence. Oh, and you are probably completely out of health potions, Amber/Mana potions (ruling out most abilities during this fight) and throwing knives because the previous segment of the game (which was awesome, BTW) is insanely hard and will require you to use all of your resources to get through alive.

And that 1 v 3 arena that ends the game? You have to repeat it 3 times to end the game, and the last round has enemies that can turn invisible. -_-

Aside from that one single gripe, the game was incredible. I still recommend the hell out of it if you like stealth games, but if the final encounter frustrates you, just look up the ending on youtube and don't feel bad. It really does not belong in that game.

Give us another epic cat-and-mouse game with the villain in a complex multi-layered arena. Make us try to beat them to the object they so desperately wanted while evading the hardest enemy type in the game, and trying to make THEM get caught instead of you. Something like that would TOTALLY have suited the game more than what we got. :(

--

Metroid other M

I don't think I need to say much here. Stupid control scheme and completely going against EVERYTHING we know about Samus to turn her into a weak-willed wuss who suddenly loves taking orders and is too stupid to ASK for authorization for something like the anti-heat shields when in a VOLCANIC AREA that's killing her? That's bordering on Franchise sabotage!
 

Ravinoff

Elite Member
Legacy
May 31, 2012
316
35
33
Country
Canada
TheMigrantSoldier said:
Fallout 4. Who the hell thought it was a good idea to map "melee" and "throw grenade" together?
Thought I was gonna be the first one to say that. "Ugh, a radroach, I'm not wasting ammo on that, I'll just squish it with a melee attack. Oh, shit, I held LAlt a quarter-second too long and now I'm on fire (or blew my own legs off)." Doesn't help that the key sticks when I try to whack it with my thumb or ring finger without taking my hand off WASD, and I can't be bothered to map it to a mouse button. Just waiting for the mod toolkit to release so somebody can split that binding (which you literally cannot do, in one of the ugliest examples of lazy porting from consoles that I've ever seen).
 

FrozenLaughs

New member
Sep 9, 2013
321
0
0
Speaking of Fallout 4...

Gamma guns.

Anybody assault the lighthouse or the cabin just north of it? JFC Gamma guns are ridiculous.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
MysticSlayer said:
I don't think I'll ever understand the rationale behind making us meditate to drink potions in The Witcher 2. Not only does it make no sense from a design perspective (who is going to know when every difficult fight will start?), but it also makes no sense from a character-progression standpoint since Geralt was perfectly capable of drinking during combat throughout the first game!
That was one of the reasons I ended up putting the game down. I heard so much about how much strategy you had to put in and how it forces you to use potions well or else you'll get slaughtered. All I saw with the potion system was a "Let's move forward, find out what is over there that will kill me, reload the point and then use the potion so that I can now kill it". I have no way of knowing what I'm going to fight so how strategic can potion using really be unless I know exactly what I'm about to fight, in which case I suppose the strategy is going down there to die (which seems like poor strategy) or looking it up online (which feels like cheating strategy).
I haven't read a whole ton yet (about halfway through the first book), but I'm pretty sure this has more to do with the books, and how geralt prepares before a fight (you study monsters and figure out what you're dealing with before heading in, that's what witchers typically try to do) so the whole sit down and meditate with potions bit has more to do with the book source than any gameplay features...at least I think.

they got rid of that in the third game though, so if that's what was putting you off then feel free to play that one.

OT:

since I just got done playing it, fallout 4, whoever thought having melee/bash be the same fucking keybind as grenade throw needs to get slapped in the face, not to mention having the fucking "alt" key of all things as bash?!? are you shitting me? there are tons of keys closer/better ergonomically designed in a moment of panic to hit then that piece of shit.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
15,016
2,676
118
gmaverick019 said:
tippy2k2 said:
That was one of the reasons I ended up putting the game down
I haven't read a whole ton yet (about halfway through the first book), but I'm pretty sure this has more to do with the books, and how geralt prepares before a fight (you study monsters and figure out what you're dealing with before heading in, that's what witchers typically try to do) so the whole sit down and meditate with potions bit has more to do with the book source than any gameplay features...at least I think.

they got rid of that in the third game though, so if that's what was putting you off then feel free to play that one.
I have read the books (or at least the ones released in English, which is 4 if you count the short story one) and you are correct. He has to meditate in order to be able to handle the strain put on his body if I remember correctly.

As to Witcher 3, I do intend to jump into it as I've heard most of what I hated about Witcher 2 (a "What the fuck is everyone talking about?" story and gameplay stuff like the potions) has been taken away.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
"What the fuck is everyone talking about?" story

knowing that you read the books now, I'm really surprised to hear someone say this, I'll admit the 2nd game isn't the *easiest* of stories to jump into, but not having read the books and only played the first game I felt fine following it, albeit you had to pay attention to certain bits and read between the lines sometimes.

in its favor, the witcher 3 certainly does a better job I think of presenting an overall macro view of the world, so you aren't.."lost" on what the story is going on about.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
15,016
2,676
118
gmaverick019 said:
tippy2k2 said:
"What the fuck is everyone talking about?" story

knowing that you read the books now, I'm really surprised to hear someone say this, I'll admit the 2nd game isn't the *easiest* of stories to jump into, but not having read the books and only played the first game I felt fine following it, albeit you had to pay attention to certain bits and read between the lines sometimes.

in its favor, the witcher 3 certainly does a better job I think of presenting an overall macro view of the world, so you aren't.."lost" on what the story is going on about.
In the games defense, I never played the first one (I had heard you could skip the first one and still get the second one) AND I read the books after I gave up on Witcher 2. If I went back to it, I would likely look much more favorable on the convoluted story line since I'd probably actually understand it now...
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
gmaverick019 said:
tippy2k2 said:
"What the fuck is everyone talking about?" story

knowing that you read the books now, I'm really surprised to hear someone say this, I'll admit the 2nd game isn't the *easiest* of stories to jump into, but not having read the books and only played the first game I felt fine following it, albeit you had to pay attention to certain bits and read between the lines sometimes.

in its favor, the witcher 3 certainly does a better job I think of presenting an overall macro view of the world, so you aren't.."lost" on what the story is going on about.
In the games defense, I never played the first one (I had heard you could skip the first one and still get the second one) AND I read the books after I gave up on Witcher 2. If I went back to it, I would likely look much more favorable on the convoluted story line since I'd probably actually understand it now...
ah fair enough, while the 2nd one I will still recommend to people, I don't think I'll ever recommend anyone to go play the first one...I enjoyed it, but holy fucking hell, probably one of the hardest beginnings to trudge through in any game ever....

not as bad as ff13, but still extremely dry and without much direction.
 

SantoUno

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,583
0
0
Surprised no one has mentioned all the batshit insanely stupid design decisions for the PvP covenants in Dark Souls 2.

I'll just quote Emarrel's video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncbvez_S5Tk]:

Whose bright idea was it to make the only way to get invasion items to be:
1: Participate in Drangleic's biggest cheese-off
2: Go into NG+ and inflate your SM to infinite buying orbs and getting paired with people who spent 1 million souls on levelling up instead of buying 99 one time use items.
I just want to bully people in their own worlds.


For those of you who haven't played Dark Souls 2 but are still curious as to why the Soul Memory mechanic was the most horribly broken aspect of that game:

Imagine for a moment all the money you have ever received in your entire LIFE. From birth to this current day, imagine all the money you've ever received as a child up until today to the money you earn on a weekly basis. Imagine if you could actually pull up that number.

Now, for some contrived reason, imagine if you and another person who has earned or received roughly the same amount of money that you have were paired up and forced to explain why they are better, cooler, spend their money more cleverly or wisely, whatever. What if you simply treated yourself all your life to junk food, movies, beer, etc.? Meanwhile, the other person spend all their money throughout their lifetime on toys to facilitate a hobby such as Lego or Knex, a violin, gym membership, martial arts or wrestling classes, books and studying materials, college tuition, health coverage, etc. I bet you would throw your hands up in the air and say "That's UNFAIR."

Congratulations, you are officially smarter than the dipshits at From Software who thought that Soul Memory would be a good indicator of what players should be paired up in PvP.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
Whoever decided Dawn of War III didn't need to be a thing.

Also whoever decided we didn't need a side scrolling beat em up based on Batman Beyond.
 

broadbandmink

New member
Apr 28, 2014
268
0
0
Silentpony said:
Also whoever decided we didn't need a side scrolling beat em up based on Batman Beyond.
[URL="{url}" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_Beyond:_Return_of_the_Joker_(video_game))]Err...?[/URL]
 

JamesStone

If it ain't broken, get to work
Jun 9, 2010
887
0
0
Blood Brain Barrier said:
1. First Person Shooters

No, really. I've never done it before, but aiming a gun and shooting someone in real life can't be nearly as hard as waving my mouse around trying to get a little trigger pointer on the baddie while he's moving, I'm moving and the screen is bobbing up and down. How is this entertaining? It's pure masochism.

2. Real time strategy

This is a no brainer. If it's 'strategy', then the skill that I need to win is strategic thinking. How the hell does this equate with furiously tapping buttons and moving the screen around to do things quickly enough to crush the enemy? That ain't strategy, that's speed. I'll take as much time as I want to decide where I want to build a city or where to move my troops, thanks.

3. Fighting games

Press left, right, down, down, down, up, A, B, A, A, B to execute a special move. Seriously? What a stupid game. I played street fighter at a friend's house once and he beat me about 10 times before I realised how dumb it was that the guy who knows more moves is going to win. I was 8 years old. Apparently people three times that age still play these games, but I don't believe it.

That is your very poor notion of a joke, I assume?


OT: Legacy of the Void: Not having hotkeys for the Spear of Adun's powers. Really breaks my train of thought to have to turn away from anything I've been doing just to click on the top of the screen. Fortunately, almost all powers from that wonderful ship are OP as all hell (Fenix comes to mind) so not much is lost, but it's still frustrating.
 

CrimsonBlaze

New member
Aug 29, 2011
2,252
0
0
KarmaTheAlligator said:
CrimsonBlaze said:
I've got two: one not so bad and another with all of the bad.

1.) Every game after Disgaea 2 in the series

Why did they take away the Master-Student skill learning mechanic in the later titles? Heck, Disgaea 3 is based on a classroom/school setting; I couldn't think of a better setting for that mechanic. I guess that it was taken out to deal away with some balancing issues with combat in order to prevent certain characters from being TOO powerful, but this is precisely why I love Disgaea 2: most of my main units could heal on the fly, Rozalin tripled as a Gunner, Mage, and Healer, my Fire Skull and Fire Mage knew all the magic skills, and I could actually beat the game with the story related characters (yes, even Tink) without breaking triple digits in the level department.
Then you didn't play Disgaea D2? That system is back, and made in such a way that you can end up with a big loop of masters and apprentices so that everyone can learn everything (it even allows you to get the weapon skills early).
To be honest, this mechanic was a staple of the first Disgaea title, so I was almost certain that it would be back for D2. For 5, I'm not sure at all.
 

Mike000

New member
Nov 22, 2007
56
0
0
Myria said:
The ending of the first Uncharted.

You thought you were playing a cover shooter with puzzle-platforming elements? Hah! Enjoy your out-of-left-field QTE ending against the world's most generic boss.
I've never really understood the hate on this one...it's like they hadn't paid the slightest attention, or possibly even played the game: the "QTE" isn't one...it's the same 3-button melee combo you were taught in the tutorial at the beginning of the game, and presumably have been using from time to time ever since.