There are actually people who take Yahtzee serious?
I like watching ZP but I don't actually take anything he says serious.
I like watching ZP but I don't actually take anything he says serious.
I would hardly say I ALWAYS agree with him, but at the same time I'd be lying if I said I never agree with him either. The problem with his review style is that it polarizes games, but MAINLY because he seems to focus on one side of most games.mrhappyface said:Do you always agree with Yahtzee?
Do you demand that every opinion voiced by every person on the escapist be backed up with reasonable arguements? Or only those you disagree with?Arcane Azmadi said:What, so you thought Alone in the Dark was a great revival of the classic series?ma55ter_fett said:I don't agree with 99.9% of what he says. Its why I never read his "extra punctuation" articles because they arn't all that funny (to me) and contain nothing that I agree with.
What is the .1% of things we agree on you ask?
I think boobs are stonking great as well.
See, that's the problem with making sweeping generalizations, you can get tripped up VERY easily.
So... you only read articles you know you'll agree with?ma55ter_fett said:Do you demand that every opinion voiced by every person on the escapist be backed up with reasonable arguements? Or only those you disagree with?Arcane Azmadi said:What, so you thought Alone in the Dark was a great revival of the classic series?ma55ter_fett said:I don't agree with 99.9% of what he says. Its why I never read his "extra punctuation" articles because they arn't all that funny (to me) and contain nothing that I agree with.
What is the .1% of things we agree on you ask?
I think boobs are stonking great as well.
See, that's the problem with making sweeping generalizations, you can get tripped up VERY easily.
In any event the ZP episodes are satire and thus can neither be agreed with or disagreed with because thats how satire works. But it seems that those opinions yahtzee expresses in the extra ZP articles are to be taken seriously (so people say) and it is those opinions to which I disagree. I haven't read many of his articles s so there may be one or two points on which we agree (But I haven't yet found them).
"Why don't you read all the articles and make a more informed decision" you may say to me
"Why bother" I will reply, reading through a stack of articles that expound views that I do not share in search of one article that I do agree with is not worth it to me.
I only read articles that I have a chance of agreeing with or if that is not possible, articles written by authors who are open to disagreement, frank discussion, and debate.Arcane Azmadi said:So... you only read articles you know you'll agree with?ma55ter_fett said:Do you demand that every opinion voiced by every person on the escapist be backed up with reasonable arguements? Or only those you disagree with?Arcane Azmadi said:What, so you thought Alone in the Dark was a great revival of the classic series?ma55ter_fett said:I don't agree with 99.9% of what he says. Its why I never read his "extra punctuation" articles because they arn't all that funny (to me) and contain nothing that I agree with.
What is the .1% of things we agree on you ask?
I think boobs are stonking great as well.
See, that's the problem with making sweeping generalizations, you can get tripped up VERY easily.
In any event the ZP episodes are satire and thus can neither be agreed with or disagreed with because thats how satire works. But it seems that those opinions yahtzee expresses in the extra ZP articles are to be taken seriously (so people say) and it is those opinions to which I disagree. I haven't read many of his articles s so there may be one or two points on which we agree (But I haven't yet found them).
"Why don't you read all the articles and make a more informed decision" you may say to me
"Why bother" I will reply, reading through a stack of articles that expound views that I do not share in search of one article that I do agree with is not worth it to me.
Hey, HEY!mrhappyface said:I'm like most Escapists. I watch both Zero Punctuation and Unskippable, the most popular video series on the site. They never fail to make me laugh and smile whenever I watch their work. However, since Zero Punctuation is the more popular of the two, more people are inclined to agree with it. Despite that, some people forget that Zero Punctuation is a "game review" in the same sense that the Colbert Report and Daily Show is a "News Show", and tend to take Yahtzee very seriously. It usually swings both ways, with people clinging on to his words like it was passed down from God himself, or with people hating ever last syllable that he utters.
I've also noticed that many people, even if they haven't played the game have posted in the comments that they harbor the same exact complaints, even if it's overlooked or practically fictional. And in the few cases that Yahtzee does review a game well, numerous people lavish their praises on it like its the second coming.
Do you always agree with Yahtzee? I have my disagreements with what he says sometimes, but that doesn't stop me from laughing and enjoying the game.
You bring up a good point. He never actually trashed a game, well except for Too Human and Turok. But then again, Yahtzee is more interested in unique original ideas other than refined or perfected reiterations of existing medians. But then again, Yahtzee is a bit like Moses. He shows that it's false, smashes the idol, and for extra burn, makes you drink all the shit that makes it up.Mikkaddo said:I would hardly say I ALWAYS agree with him, but at the same time I'd be lying if I said I never agree with him either. The problem with his review style is that it polarizes games, but MAINLY because he seems to focus on one side of most games.mrhappyface said:Do you always agree with Yahtzee?
You see, I take Yahtzee as sort of the "Anti-Gamespot" if you will. If you look at their reviews of most of the same games that Yahtzee has reviewed you see words like "great" and "wonderful" and "awesome" and you hear the tidbits that make them so, with a sort of afterthought mentioning there is bad stuff too.
But Yahtzee, he does the exact opposite, he points out every flaw. He takes a golden idol, and shows you it's hollow. He dispels the gushing that most reviewers seem to give. Granted in an exaggerated fashion, but I think that's part of what makes it so refreshing. and you'll also notice he very, VERY rarely seems to actually say "NEVER PURCHASE THIS GAME OR IT WILL KILL YOU WITH BADNESS" nor does he ever seem to claim if you don't buy a copy of game X he will himself find you and murder you. Instead he tries (and mostly succeeds) at doing exactly what he claims, showing 99% of games for the bland same ol' same ol' garbage they've always been so the few, the proud the TRULY great games, can shine above them like the North Star.
So no, I don't always agree with him, but I find him very refreshing.