Furburt said:
Baconmonster723 said:
Just because someone plays flash applications or nintendogs does not make them a gamer.
No, it doesn't make them a hardcore gamer. However, under a textbook definition, what Zynga makes counts as games, thus, those who play them regularly are gamers. It's just semantics.
Perhaps it is semantics but I consider someone a gamer if they play a variety of games (and I don't mean a variety of Zynga games as they're pretty much all the same anyway), whereas the majority of Zynga users haven't ventured outside of Farmville yet. So, therefore, they're Farmville players. If they say they've had a go at other games then, fine, they're a gamer.
But, then, I guess it's just the way you look at it.
A bit more on topic: For me, personally, I've never hated Zynga, and I hope none of my posts in the polls have ever implied that. I've tried to remain as level headed as possible. I'm more frustrated at how unbalanced the competition is. Yes, it may be a simple popularity competition and, yes, it's not supposed to be taken seriously but what's the point in any competition if there's no fairness in it. Of course, one competitor is always going to have some advantage of some sort over another but Zynga's is so blatant and so huge, there just doesn't seem to be any point in voting any more. It isn't about them advertising on their game pages, I don't mind that because anyone is allowed to do that, but it's the fact that their fans are able to log in and vote via their gaming platform - Facebook. Some have argued that any company could advertise the competition on Facebook but Zynga are the only developer in the competition to operate solely on Facebook, that's where they base their games so of course their fans are going to see the adverts and, because it's easy to vote for Facebook users, of course they're going to vote.
That's my only problem with Zynga in this competition. I know a lot of people have a problem with their past business practices as well and it's a valid point but it's not what's unbalancing the voting. I just don't see the point in a competition that isn't fun. Also, the spamming, lack of coherency in posts, and hate in the threads just takes any kind of enjoyment I could garner from the debates that have been going on in them as they just get buried, and mostly ignored.
This is my first March Madness so I'm not sure what the others were like, apart from bits and pieces I've heard (none good), but were they civil and enjoyable at any point? If not, then perhaps The Escapist should consider another event to bring in new users for next year.