Why are Americans so Patriotic?

Recommended Videos

kane.malakos

New member
Jan 7, 2011
344
0
0
Riff Moonraker said:
The Human Torch said:
It's just the vocal minority. Which unfortunately (as always) are far more in the spotlight than most Americans, who plainly don't give a crap.
Sorry, but its NOT the vocal minority. The vocal minority are actually the ones who are NOT patriotic.
It really depends on your point of view and your definition of patriotism. A lot of people seem to consider patriotism blindly ignoring the faults of America, but I tend to define it differently. I consider myself a patriot, because I care a lot about America, but a lot of people would call me unpatriotic because I criticize many of the directions that we are taking.
 

jbchillin

New member
Sep 16, 2010
325
0
0
I love my country and will always be proud of it. I find it sad when people don't care about the place they were born and raised. My country has its flaws but in all honesty which country doesn't? In essence i bleed red white and blue and will chant "USA" at any given moment.
 

kane.malakos

New member
Jan 7, 2011
344
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
Fagotto said:
Kopikatsu said:
Fagotto said:
Kopikatsu said:
Never use wikipedia as a source. Never.
That's just a silly thing to say. Wikipedia works as a source.
Try telling that to a college professor.
Try considering the reasons instead of just mimicking them. Life is not an academic paper where people should be using more direct sources.
The reason is that anyone can edit Wikipedia. Giving people the freedom to do whatever rarely ends well.
Your point would work if not for the fact that Wikipedia is heavily, heavily moderated. Seriously, try putting up some inaccurate information and see how long it lasts.
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
Eh, to be fair, what you're describing isn't really Patriotism, it's Nationalism, which is just an extreme form of the former. I'd say yes, most of us are happy or proud about our home, but we really don't go much beyond that, and we're still more than able to see and point out the flaws, and speak out against our government when they herp-a-derp. It's the vocal minority who tend to get annoying about it.

Oh a similar note, I have to ask....how do you (the rest of the world), judge us in relation to people like Sarah Palin, and the Tea Party? I promise she is in a VAST minority, really, the most of us are nothing like that...
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Volf99 said:
EvilPicnic said:
Volf99 said:
To quote John Dalberg-Acton, "Power corrupts, and absoulte power corrupts absolutely". Think about if this government gave to ok to do something like what (PRC)China is doing to Tibet, America is doing at Guantanamo Bay, what England did to Ireland/India/China/Africa/Argentina. Who could oppose them? They would be the most powerful organized body in the entire world. It would be to risky to have.
Not disputing your argument (which I mostly agree with), but what exactly did England do to Argentina?

Be among the first to recognise their sovereignty as a nation? Invest heavily in their economy when they most needed it? Lose to their football team due to an illegal handball (and constantly thereafter)? Or defend themselves in the Falkland Islands when the Argentines invaded?

The British Empire did not have a great Human Rights record, but I don't think Argentina is generally included on the list of abuses...
The issue with the Falkland Islands, England has no right being there anymore than they did being in Hong Kong.
Ask that to the people who live there.

The islands were uninhabited when they were discovered, so it was fair game.

When soverignty came into dispute, they even let the islanders vote on who they wanted to be part of.

The British did many terrible things in their colonial days, but the Falklands was not one of them.
"Fair game"? Really? Sounds more like Imperialism to me. Why would a country that is 777.8 miles away from the Faroe Islands, need to go there? Honestly?
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
Volf99 said:
OhJohnNo said:
Volf99 said:
OhJohnNo said:
Volf99 said:
OhJohnNo said:
Volf99 said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Patriotism only serves to breed distrust between different cultures. We should attempt to unite under one banner and relinquish our imaginary differences rather than enforce and encourage them. Patriotism is dangerous, plain and simple.
hhmmm...no. I rather not because that sounds like a gateway to have a single monolith government/country that spans the globe and I don't want that.
Why not?

Seriously, what are the downsides?
To quote John Dalberg-Acton, "Power corrupts, and absoulte power corrupts absolutely". Think about if this government gave to ok to do something like what (PRC)China is doing to Tibet, America is doing at Guantanamo Bay, what England did to Ireland/India/China/Africa/Argentina. Who could oppose them? They would be the most powerful organized body in the entire world. It would be to risky to have.
Hmm... yes, I can definitely see that downside. This is why we must get to work on benevolent (and we'd better make really motherfucking sure they are completely benevolent) computers to govern this theoretical all-encompassing country as quickly as possible. I imagine they'd work better than all the other forms of governance that have been tried...
I don't know the name, but there was some book in the 1980's about two super computers, one in Russia and one in America. They were to protect their countries and ended up enslaving the population to do so. So...... I rather have people run governments, because at least their rule isn't forever, which I can't say the same about computers. Also I have some irrational fear that the computer might turn into the computer from the story, I have no mouth and I must scream.
Yeah, so I imagine we'd have to be veeeeeeeeeery specific and veeeeeeeeery careful when coding said computers. I'm still convinced it would work better than the current best (Democracy).
lol, yes we would have to be "veeeeeeeeeery specific and veeeeeeeeery careful" when build and coding the computer. Also it would be good if it didn't have absolute power and if we had a self destruct switch built in as well.
Well yes... but if you include a self-destruct button, the laws of fiction dictate that the computer will render it useless and take over the world out of spite and disrespect for humans.

True story.
lmao, yep I forgot about that part. Skynet would also probably appear too.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,525
0
0
Volf99 said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Volf99 said:
EvilPicnic said:
Volf99 said:
To quote John Dalberg-Acton, "Power corrupts, and absoulte power corrupts absolutely". Think about if this government gave to ok to do something like what (PRC)China is doing to Tibet, America is doing at Guantanamo Bay, what England did to Ireland/India/China/Africa/Argentina. Who could oppose them? They would be the most powerful organized body in the entire world. It would be to risky to have.
Not disputing your argument (which I mostly agree with), but what exactly did England do to Argentina?

Be among the first to recognise their sovereignty as a nation? Invest heavily in their economy when they most needed it? Lose to their football team due to an illegal handball (and constantly thereafter)? Or defend themselves in the Falkland Islands when the Argentines invaded?

The British Empire did not have a great Human Rights record, but I don't think Argentina is generally included on the list of abuses...
The issue with the Falkland Islands, England has no right being there anymore than they did being in Hong Kong.
Ask that to the people who live there.

The islands were uninhabited when they were discovered, so it was fair game.

When soverignty came into dispute, they even let the islanders vote on who they wanted to be part of.

The British did many terrible things in their colonial days, but the Falklands was not one of them.
"Fair game"? Really? Sounds more like Imperialism to me. Why would a country that is 777.8 miles away from the Faroe Islands, need to go there? Honestly?
The Islands didn't belong to anyone, and that was pretty much the 'in thing' at the time. You know. Finding places.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Volf99 said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Volf99 said:
EvilPicnic said:
Volf99 said:
To quote John Dalberg-Acton, "Power corrupts, and absoulte power corrupts absolutely". Think about if this government gave to ok to do something like what (PRC)China is doing to Tibet, America is doing at Guantanamo Bay, what England did to Ireland/India/China/Africa/Argentina. Who could oppose them? They would be the most powerful organized body in the entire world. It would be to risky to have.
Not disputing your argument (which I mostly agree with), but what exactly did England do to Argentina?

Be among the first to recognise their sovereignty as a nation? Invest heavily in their economy when they most needed it? Lose to their football team due to an illegal handball (and constantly thereafter)? Or defend themselves in the Falkland Islands when the Argentines invaded?

The British Empire did not have a great Human Rights record, but I don't think Argentina is generally included on the list of abuses...
The issue with the Falkland Islands, England has no right being there anymore than they did being in Hong Kong.
Ask that to the people who live there.

The islands were uninhabited when they were discovered, so it was fair game.

When soverignty came into dispute, they even let the islanders vote on who they wanted to be part of.

The British did many terrible things in their colonial days, but the Falklands was not one of them.
"Fair game"? Really? Sounds more like Imperialism to me. Why would a country that is 777.8 miles away from the Faroe Islands, need to go there? Honestly?
The Islands didn't belong to anyone, and that was pretty much the 'in thing' at the time. You know. Finding places.
I meant to type Falklands not Faroe Islands, my bad. Anyways, the whole issue should be between Argentina and the Falklands, England has no right to but in between the two places anymore than it does butting in between any issues Hong Kong has with Mainland China.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Volf99 said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Patriotism only serves to breed distrust between different cultures. We should attempt to unite under one banner and relinquish our imaginary differences rather than enforce and encourage them. Patriotism is dangerous, plain and simple.
hhmmm...no. I rather not because that sounds like a gateway to have a single monolith government/country that spans the globe and I don't want that.
It sounds like people being more receptive to other cultures. Patriotism breeds distrust.
 

antigodoflife

New member
Nov 12, 2009
521
0
0
Every country is patriotic, patriotism is a love for your country or the potential for your country. I'm a patriot of my country because environmentally it's one of the best countries in the world, I just don't agree with it's piss-poor excuse of people and their moralities and our politics and policies. It's my patriotic duty to try and fix what I don't like in my country to find my utopia and everyone is the same in different levels of extremities.

Americans are patriotic like anyone else, they on the other hand have an alarming number of Nationalists they agree with what ever their president agree upon even if it's bad, as long as they're in the same major political party, otherwise they protest that their country is heading towards the destruction.

In all honesty, if you're a Republican or Democrat you need to do some soul searching, you're both in the wrong political party, both of which don't even know what they believe in anymore. You should instead look at alternative parties that focus more on as many your beliefs as possible. I myself have not found my political party, all I know is I'm some form of Middle-Left, Economic Social Libertarian, Environmentalist (anyone want to help me discover my political party is more than welcome.)

Individualism is one's most important trait and with it ends Nationalism, which is your problem. Be individual without conforming to indie culture you dirty hipster. :p
 

repeating integers

New member
Mar 17, 2010
3,314
0
0
kane.malakos said:
Kopikatsu said:
Fagotto said:
Kopikatsu said:
Fagotto said:
Kopikatsu said:
Never use wikipedia as a source. Never.
That's just a silly thing to say. Wikipedia works as a source.
Try telling that to a college professor.
Try considering the reasons instead of just mimicking them. Life is not an academic paper where people should be using more direct sources.
The reason is that anyone can edit Wikipedia. Giving people the freedom to do whatever rarely ends well.
Your point would work if not for the fact that Wikipedia is heavily, heavily moderated. Seriously, try putting up some inaccurate information and see how long it lasts.
To be fair, it's perfectly possible to sneak in a tiny bit of inaccurate information and let it go unnoticed for months. The page for soil once said that soil was mostly composed of old particles of rainbows, or something similarly ridiculous, for a long time.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
Volf99 said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Patriotism only serves to breed distrust between different cultures. We should attempt to unite under one banner and relinquish our imaginary differences rather than enforce and encourage them. Patriotism is dangerous, plain and simple.
hhmmm...no. I rather not because that sounds like a gateway to have a single monolith government/country that spans the globe and I don't want that.
It sounds like people being more receptive to other cultures. Patriotism breeds distrust.
I'm not sold on multiculturalism through out the world. If people in South Korean want to be Patriotic and dislike non South Korean culture, that's their right as South Koreans. If Iceland wanted to be Patriotic and dislike non Icelandic culture, again that is their right. But I digress.

I think patriotism is fine as long as it doesn't lead to nonsense like (PRC)China's one china policy which means that Tibetan people have to suffer so that Han Chinese people can feel good about themselves.
 

Mallefunction

New member
Feb 17, 2011
906
0
0
Volf99 said:
Mallefunction said:
You know that being patriotic is actually part of our goal in public education here in the US right? I'm not even kidding. There is a reason that every morning, public school kids are made to stand and read the Pledge like we're goddamn Hitler youths.

It's mostly due to WWII and the Cold War. Especially the McCarthy cases. People got so scared about foreigners and it became all about how America is the fuckin' shit. Unfortunately, times have changed, but the attitudes of many current adults who were either born during those times or grew up during them have no yet changed with them.
Maybe its because I'm a Jew with grandparents from the Holocaust, so I'm just being overly sensitive, but please don't type that the Pledge of Allegiance is like the Hitler Youths. The two are not at all the same.
My family are Orthodox jews. I used that example (knowing very well that one is MUCH more extreme than the other), because honestly it's the most recognizable. There are plenty of other dictators who tried to get kids involved in their regime, but I seriously doubt too many people here would know about them.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Therumancer said:
In so far as this discussion goes, yes. There is a lot of leeway for massive disagreement within the general support of America, however when your dealing with arguements that lead to the reduction in power and primacy of your own nation that is the opposite of patriotism... which is exactly the point. Right now it's "hip" to be un-patriotic.
That's silly. right now it's "hip" to want government to stop propping up toxic corporations. It's "hip" to want some accountability from Wall Street. Man, do you really think that accountability is unamerican?

I mean, we're supposed to be "of the people, by the people, and for the people."

Or is that last quote unamerican?
The way it's done, yes, it pretty much defines hipster/hippie politics.

The central issue we're facing right now in the US is that we are a capitalist system, where people have the freedom to own their own property, compete, and do business, with success or failure being based on your relative capabilities.

The problem largely being that we've gotten to the point where we have a few greedy arseholes ruining it for everyone, and using their success to load the deck so other people can't even get into a position to compete with them.

The issue is of course how one goes about regulating this kind of thing, without totally destroying the freedom that goes along with it. Right now the people protesting, either have no idea what to do for a new system, or want to impose some form of socialism which would bring it's own problems, probably greatly in excess of what we have now. Not to mention the simple fact that the USA's capitalist system props up a lot of the world, whether people want to accept that or not.

There are also international aspects to the entire thing, that largely come down to the US forgetting the old maxim "Free Trade means he with the biggest guns trades freely" we've become too pre-occupied with our morality and a desire for peace to actually enforce our own interests. One major example of this is the issue with China's "robber economy" where China knocks off things invested in and owned by businesses here in the US (and to be fair, also from all over the world) and then sells them at cut rates due to producing the products in sweatshops, and not having to make up the initial investment. In order to maintain peace the US has largely borrowed money from China, which was a combination of paid tribute, and to maintain the peace because the US at least could argue it was getting it's share of the money (similar to what it would have been getting from taxing those products and otherwise taking it's cut), where China was also making money to pump up it's standard of living. Needless to say as things change this relationship isn't working well anymore, with people taking those "loans" seriously due to China's increasing strength, and of course business interests getting increasingly pissed because the US has been snubbing them. After all when the US goverment let's another nation steal from you, while the UN and World Court try and prevent the issue from ever being resolved officially, it doesn't exactly garnet positive relations. The fact that China is rapidly becoming too powerful to guarantee a victory if we were to attack (compared to when we could have done it easily) also hasn't gone unnoticed.... and this is just one issue among many. One of the reasons why the goverment hasn't been all that effective in dealing with business interests is that it has little or no credability with them. It can be argued that US neglect internationally was part of what caused a lot of these problems (though by no means all of them), after all it only makes sense that a company that produces a product, and has another nation steal and undercut it, is going to run into some problems (and as I said this is only part of it). Our reluctance to go to war for our own interests and make people stop doing things, or respect our properties and interests have caused a lot of problems.

The overall point here is that there is a lot of Anti-American sentiment in the US (ie we are not majorly Patriotic internally), and a lot of that sentiment DOES come from Hipsters and left wingers over exactly this kind of issue, with such people ultimatly campaigning against the system in general without a clue of what to change (someone else will have to figure it out) or for some variation on socialism... if not some naive take on what anarchy would turn out like.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,657
0
0
What I don't get is how a lot of my fellow Canadians are patriotic about Canada simply because we're not America. It's like a superiority and inferiority complex all rolled into one.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Volf99 said:
If people in South Korean want to be Patriotic and dislike non South Korean culture, that's their right as South Koreans. If Iceland wanted to be Patriotic and dislike non Icelandic culture, again that is their right. But I digress.
All patriotism does is build more walls and we have a lot of fucking walls in need of destroying at the moment. We shouldn't encourage it. What a person can do and what a person can't do are two completely different things.

Volf99 said:
I think patriotism is fine as long as it doesn't lead to nonsense
Patriotism always leads to "nonsense".
 

Axyun

New member
Oct 31, 2011
206
0
0
CATB320 said:
What's wrong with being patriotic? Geez, people.
Nothing is wrong with being patriotic as long as you are objective about it. The problem is that the media is quick to call someone a communist, terrorist or extremist if you don't agree with the U.S. government and its policies 100%.

I've never been a fan of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I've always held the believe that we should not have gone to war with either country from the start. Most people can't seem to understand that the attack on ground zero was the result of a conflict that's been brewing for quite some time and that we have some responsibility in it. Yet when I voice my opinion, the lash-back I get from U.S. jingoists is disturbing.

And I say this as a U.S. citizen that likes living in America and almost lost his father and cousin to the attacks on September 11.
 
May 5, 2010
4,829
0
0
Wow, that is a lot of text. I think some spoilers are in order.

interspark said:
it might be just an unfair stereotype,
Yes. Yes it is. It OBVIOUSLY is.
but it's generally believed that if you badmouth america, any nearby americans will go up in arms and get very angry,
That depends on several factors, including who the americans are, and what exactly the "badmouther" says. There's a difference between offing a thoughtful and intelligent dialouge about my countries' (many) problems, and simply yelling "AMERICA SUCKS!!". Your statement is a ridiculous generalization.
and i'm just wondering why. Just to clarify, i have nothing against america, but i hardly think it's anything to write home about. and don't say that anyone would be that way about their home country, because if someone came up to be and said "hey, england's crap!" i'd just say "yeah, it is a bit"
Yes. And if you came up to most Americans and said "America's crap!" I'm sure most of them would share your sentiment. I know I certainly would. Please, in the future, try to avoid sweeping generalizations about my country. It's a big place, we don't exactly have weekly meetings.


MelasZepheos said:
I remember an American who came to our school once telling us that they had to repeat some sort of 'America is awesome' thing (I pledge allegiance? I can't remember, it's been a while) at school every day since he was young.

So basically indoctrination, that's why Americans are so patriotic. It's got nothing to do with whether the country is great or not, it's that the children are taught about how awesome America is before they can even talk properly. It's kind of like how Stalin or Kim Jong Il got people to think they were awesome, byt forming a cult of personality, only instead of a person, america do it to a country.
It's just words, no one really believes it. No kid believes they are actually pledging life-long allegiance to America. It's just an outdated tradition that no one cares enough to get rid of. Maybe when you're a little kid you have this idealistic view of America, but once you start learning about imperialism and the Cold War and shit like that, that idealistic view goes away in a hurry. Which brings me to...

On a related and hilarious note (for me) he also told us that in his textbooks and lessons he wasn't taught that America lost the Vietnam War. When he started doing history at GCSE (we did Vietnam) he was genuinely shocked to find out that they hadn't done so good there. And this was someone who lived in New York and went to school there, not some backwoods Louisianna swamp kid.
I don't what the fuck school he went to, but where I come from, it's pretty common knowledge that the Vietnam War was a giant clusterfuck that never should have happened. Oh, and that we ABSOLUTELY lost. Ha, No. We lost. Everyone knows that. I think your friend was just a fucking idiot.

EDIT: Sorry, should also point out how it's not really 'true' patriotism, it's more like nationalism. That whole jingoistic 'my country tis of thee' stuff that rednecks and Republicans spout isn't patriotism. Captain America patriotism is very different 'I am loyal to nothing, except the American dream.' Not cultural boundaries, not nationalist pride, but the dream of a free country where people are judged on the merits of their character and their actions instead of the luck of their birth or their choice of religion or partner or anything else.

Nationalism is 'my country, right or wrong.'
Patriotism is 'My country right or wrong, if right to be kept right, if wrong to be set right.'

So many so-called patriots forget the second half of that sentence.
FINALLY some goddamn common sense. Some arguments that aren't based of the testimony of "some guy who's from America". (There are a lot of us, it's not a very prestigious title) Thank you, this edit puts your post in a much better light. Though while I'm here, I might as well point out that, in the version of American history I'VE been taught, we spent most of it being giant douchebags. To put it simply. No one is learning some kind of false, "America always wins" history here. I know about all the shit my country's got up to in the past.

Frankly, I would keep quoting people, but if I tried to address every instance of ignorance and stereotyping in this thread, I've never leave my computer. So I'll just leave it at that.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Mallefunction said:
Volf99 said:
Mallefunction said:
You know that being patriotic is actually part of our goal in public education here in the US right? I'm not even kidding. There is a reason that every morning, public school kids are made to stand and read the Pledge like we're goddamn Hitler youths.

It's mostly due to WWII and the Cold War. Especially the McCarthy cases. People got so scared about foreigners and it became all about how America is the fuckin' shit. Unfortunately, times have changed, but the attitudes of many current adults who were either born during those times or grew up during them have no yet changed with them.
Maybe its because I'm a Jew with grandparents from the Holocaust, so I'm just being overly sensitive, but please don't type that the Pledge of Allegiance is like the Hitler Youths. The two are not at all the same.
My family are Orthodox jews. I used that example (knowing very well that one is MUCH more extreme than the other), because honestly it's the most recognizable. There are plenty of other dictators who tried to get kids involved in their regime, but I seriously doubt too many people here would know about them.
First off, being Jewish doesn't equate to having you family murdered in WW2. I never understood why other Jews (I don't know about your family) seem to think that they can relate to me because just because were both Jews. [End Rant]

I understand what you mean, but I think your trying to make the pledge out worse than it is. Honestly most people say it, but I don't think they care about what it means. The pledge has become as patriotic as Christmas has become a "religious" holiday.
 

TheVioletBandit

New member
Oct 2, 2011
579
0
0
interspark said:
it might be just an unfair stereotype, but it's generally believed that if you badmouth america, any nearby americans will go up in arms and get very angry, and i'm just wondering why. Just to clarify, i have nothing against america, but i hardly think it's anything to write home about. and don't say that anyone would be that way about their home country, because if someone came up to be and said "hey, england's crap!" i'd just say "yeah, it is a bit"
I honestly don't know any one like that and I have lived in America all my life. I have seen in it television shows and movies, but never in real life. Am sure their are Americans out there that are extremely patriotic, but their a minority as far as I can tell, and patriotism isn't strictly an American thing anyway, there are patriotic people in every country.