aba1 said:
Realistically you shouldn't need a army to begin with.
You really believe that? Let share with you a snippet from Yahtzee's review of the PC game
Spore.
"Will Wright is clearly no stranger to the odd cheeseburger because playing as a friendly celery-munching hippie race is a lot harder than being a bunch of aggressive, warlike megalomaniacs who communicate by biting each others faces off. Once you've moved on to the real-time strategy tribal phase, if you reject the savage, meat-eating, weapon stockpiling lifestyle, you will quickly find that there are several tribes within convenient walking distance who didn't and who will make you their little whimpering bitches before you can even break out the tambourines. A stark and accurate portrayal of the development of human society, perhaps, but probably not the intended experience that only gets more one-sided with the Civilization stage during which you either pay all of the other cities to not kill you, or rampage around the world blowing up computer players who don't have the luxury of being able to pause the game and build 50 gun turrets."
Something to consider, isn't it?
Basically my stance is, I'd hate any soldier that thinks that what they do, as important as it is, should result in me worshiping the ground they walk on every day without question. I also hate people that goes to the opposite extreme and says what they do is not only unimportant, but a determent to society as a whole. Because you're both the same exact breed of pompous asshole.
So I give them respect for what they do, but not that much more than the average civilian. That still has to be earned.