Why do people scream "Feminist Agenda" when there is a female lead?

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Malpraxis said:
On your first point I cannot single out anyone, because for my own mental health I only glance those articles and see that part of games media as an amorphous mass who is constantly "Rabble, rabble, rabble". So I can concede that point if it makes you feel better.
It's probably best not to make the claim, then. I'm also not sure why you conceding that a statement you made is untrue would make me feel better.

They were objectively too many women in positions of power for that time period.
See, I thought you were talking as it related to the other games. The idea of "objectively too many women" ion an AC game is one I'm not taking seriously. Sure you, can prance around the rooftops on a Batman-esque grappling hook, revisiting the memories of dead people through a completely impossible means of data recording using technology from ancient time-traveling aliens...just in this game alone. Sure, you've used firearms and tanks and flying machines, helped invent numerous devices before their time, and found out everyone famous is either an Assassin or a Templar. Sure, you have supernatural vision that gives you sight beyond sight and caused massacres nobody remembers historically for some reason[footnote]Actually, the same reason women in power might be legit--it is implied that the Templars have been suppressing history[/footnote].

But if too many important people have boobs, suddenly it's objectively wrong.

No one seemed to mind a trans man as a sidequest giver.
I'm assuming you mean in-game, where Jacob actually does. His attitude is kept to a minimum, probably because he sees a use in Ned. In fact, Ned at one point has a laugh at the notion Jacob came to help him out of altruism. But can you point out where it's confirmed in-game hat Ned is trans? Because I played through the main game, the side stories, and got his loyalty to max (and he was the hardest to please, it seems), and I couldn't find it. In fact, it's possible this was another practice of the day: women presenting as men in order to enter social circles where women weren't allowed.

Given the first modern use describing transgender individuals dates to the 20th century, he wouldn't have likely been regarded as a transman anyway. He would have either been treated as a homosexual or a crossdresser, if regarded at all (men, potentially including transwomen were more frequently the targets because of perceived sexual deviance). However, it's no more absurd to believe that even if he was trans he was regarded as a man in his day-to-day life than it is to say Freddie Mercury or Liberace were gay in a time where gays were persecuted.

Hell, I know people who everyone in the military knew was gay who served during both the pre-DADT days and the DADT days. In their day-to-day lives, it didn't impact shit. Yet if you look at public perception, you would think this didn't happen (you might also think they actually didn't ask which is also wrong). 100 years from now, someone with a limited understanding about late-20th century culture might argue it was unrealistic for one of my friends to exist. And they would be wrong.

And that's treating this game with superweapons and time-traveling aliens as the historical treatise it isn't.

EDIT: and even my coverage is a bit simplistic, due to trying to condense an entire time period and views into a single, legible post.
 

Zacharious-khan

New member
Mar 29, 2011
559
0
0
forgot this wasn't a star wars thread for a minute there
JimB said:
Flaws arguments (abrasive, fear, violent )
It seems you may not understand what a character flaw is. Its a malfunction in an otherwise normally functioning person in each of these situations you are describing rationality not flaws.
Ren for example has little control over his emotions this is evident throughout the film. Fin tends to never thinks things through. These are character flaws because bad things happen.
Its normal to be abrasive when tensions are high, its normal to try and shoot the people who are trying to kill you and your friends, and if you recall she was attempting to draw them away from the droid. Its normal and part of the heroes journey to refuse the call of destiny. These aren't patterns of behavior.


JimB said:
Droids aren't people, and it really is a flaw in a world where survival is so far from assured as it is on Jakku. Seriously, all it takes is for her to swallow wrong and she's miles from anyone who can give her the Heimlich. And that's ignoring that her job as a scavenger suffers because two people could work more efficiently to share profits.
You may be confusing "is currently alone" with "is a loner" since given the opportunity she becomes very quickly attached to Fin and is about to go flying round with Han and Chewie although 10mins later she does say she's going to go back to Jakku, seemingly forgetting about the job offer. Really it's just bad writing more than anything. Maybe people don't want to work with her because her boss swindles her on parts.

Why aren't droids people? or at least people-esque. They seem to be able to talk and emote. And she saved it from the not-jawa which is rather highly empathic towards people she doesn't know/care for. Is there a skill diverse reason I'm not seeing why she wouldn't just sell the droid for 40 portions?


JimB said:
And that is a rude attempt to dismiss my point about specialization versus generalization without ever actually addressing any of the support I offer for it, thinking insulting me is close enough to presenting a logical argument. For the record, the attempt at deflection is not working.
Oh that's because I didn't think you were serious since you have literally zero evidence for that and it's not relevant, that's why you were dismissed. Its not how many it's how do you know things you have no way of knowing. This only even makes sense if you think that people in the military get no sort of general training before choosing ( or assignment) into specialization.


JimB said:
Rey's boss is the one who was modifying the Millennium Falcon. I don't one hundred percent remember if she explicitly said she was involved in the work (though I feel like she did), but I'll treat her as if she didn't and we'll just have to assume that she was involved based on that knowledge.
No, she didn't as far as we know she's a scavenger. And are we just going to let that one go? How to fix the poison gas problem and that you can just bypass a compressor without destroying a ship about to jump to hyperspace and also what that part would look like?

JimB said:
And yes, Stormtroopers can't fly. They are specialists. I already said this in the paragraph you insulted me for. They are trained and bred to die, so they lack life skills. Rey was not trained to die, and it was already established in Episode IV that Luke being able to fly the hovering equivalent of a pickup truck equates to being able to fly an F-14 in combat situations with no training necessary, a fact which no one in the Rebellion comments on or thinks is odd, so this is clearly a universe where being able to pilot one kind of vehicle translates to being able to fly any kind of vehicle, even in a dogfight.
At this point you say stormtroopers can't fly their own ships because their too specialized in things that aren't directly related to their military training. You did hear the thing near the beginning of the movie where they imply all the new storm troopers are conditioned from infancy to be soldiers since they aren't clones any more.
But yes, I personally buy into the idea that a teenager who's hellbent on joining the resistance and works with heavy machinery and at least had time and reason to be instructed after reaching the rebel base, may know how to fly a ship designed for one person better than a girl flying a half broken ship designed to be piloted by two. Also she's better than the people whose job it is to be able to fly them.


JimB said:
Rey did not have intimate knowledge of Han's transport ship; you are just making that up. She had to guess where the circuits she wanted were and crawl around in search of them, and she was wrong about which ones she thought she was closing.
And you know If this wasn't the only scene where she screws something up due to being so cocksure it would have been a really cool one were it not for basically everything else she does in this film. But she does know what fuses on an alien ship look like and how to work that console she uses to save Fin.
This isn't even that bad its just with everything else it only can add to the pile.

JimB said:
Similarly, you are making that up about the knowledge of hatches on the Star Killer base. She didn't jump over the edge of the cliff because she knew a thing she needed was there; she did it because Stormtroopers were going to catch her if she didn't jump. That a hatch she needed was right there was nothing more than what they at Cinema Sins would (rightly) call a sin of convenience.
Here's the biggest problem with all of these things is that things go too well, way to often with out explanation. I suppose you could go with stupid and lucky but that's worse. And since the movie isn't out of theaters yet I can't double check this but I do recall her looking down and going straight for the big lever.

JimB said:
As for her Force abilities, sorry, but I can't care about this. Luke did infinitely more impressive things on no training. Yeah, Obi-Wan taught him how to have foresight over the course of fifteen minutes of training on the way to Alderaan, but remember that in the original trilogy, before the power creep of the extended universe and the video games and the canon-contradicting prequels set in, Obi-Wan did not display any telekinetic powers, only telepathic ones. We have to assume he simply didn't possess the ability to move things with his mind in the original movie, and therefore he couldn't have taught Luke how to do so, but Luke nevertheless possesses the titanic, frankly terrifying telekinetic powers to overcome the velocity and inertia of two torpedoes in mid-flight, make them make a ninety-degree turn into an aperture barely big enough to accommodate them without them impacting on the surface like they did when the guy with a targeting computer designed specifically for that purpose did, and then correct their flight to level out so they'd fly down the exhaust port to the reactor. When you think about the energy and the control it takes to do such a thing, no one in any of the six movies that followed did anything half as impressive. Even Palpatine conjuring lightning from the air isn't that impressive, so if Rey has less training but still accomplishes less than Luke did? Whatever. The Force apparently doesn't require that much in the way of training to start with, to judge by how fast Luke picks it up.
That's a really fancy way to say "could feel the right time to fire missiles". This wasn't impossible, if they had thought you needed psychokinetic powers to make the shot they probably wouldn't have used that plan at all. What would have been the point of any of the other pilots even trying? Doesn't even matter though what does is her ability to best Kylo (a person trained by both Luke and Snoke) in force related activities 3 times to one and learn how to Jedi mind trick on the spot.
We even have an example of why this is so stupid, Attack of the clones, Dooku and Yoda can't throw stuff at each other since they are "equal in their use of the force". Recall Rylo trying to get the Lightsabre near the end, She just takes it like it's nothing. Unless Kylo is actually Darth Wimp lo and they trained him wrong as a joke, there is no reason this should happen ever.

JimB said:
I never heard anyone say that. I only heard them bitching about how Joss Whedon clearly thinks any woman who can't get pregnant is a monster (which, again, is not what that scene actually says).
Pretty neat, I have no more interest in arguing this particular semantic point.
 

JimB

New member
Apr 1, 2012
2,180
0
0
Zacharious-khan said:
It's normal to be abrasive when tensions are high, it's normal to try and shoot the people who are trying to kill you and your friends, and if you recall she was attempting to draw them away from the droid.
It's normal, and it's stupid. They were tactically unsound decisions.

Zacharious-khan said:
You may be confusing "is currently alone" with "is a loner."
Nope. Even if you think living alone and working alone don't qualify her as a loner (which is a weird damn set of criteria to me, but whatever), she tries to kick BB-8 out as soon as she frees him, she refuses a life of companionship with Han Solo in favor of sitting alone on Jakku.

Zacharious-khan said:
Why aren't droids people?
If they're people rather than objects, then Bail Organa is history's greatest monster for erasing C-3PO's memory. Within the confines of the galaxy as presented, they're not free-willed beings. They're sophisticated, anthropomorphized tools.

Zacharious-khan said:
Is there a skill diverse reason I'm not seeing why she wouldn't just sell the droid for forty portions?
It was sixty, not forty, and the skill she picked up is discernment. When the guy who the audience is first introduced to screws you out of your fair share of work, then screws you harder the second time, then offers you a princely sum for a droid, you figure out he is still trying to screw you.

Zacharious-khan said:
It's not how many, it's how do you know things you have no way of knowing.
And I think there are explained reasons in the movie that you're choosing to disregard because they present evidence contrary to your case.

Zacharious-khan said:
This only even makes sense if you think that people in the military get no sort of general training before choosing (or assignment) into specialization.
Which they clearly don't, given how Finn is introduced to the plot.

Zacharious-khan said:
No, she didn't as far as we know she's a scavenger. And are we just going to let that one go? How to fix the poison gas problem and that you can just bypass a compressor without destroying a ship about to jump to hyperspace and also what that part would look like?
...Are you seriously arguing that the person we're introduced to as she scavenges parts from a space ship to sell for profit is someone who cannot identify the functioning parts of a space ship? Like, really?

Zacharious-khan said:
You did hear the thing near the beginning of the movie where they imply all the new Stormtroopers are conditioned from infancy to be soldiers since they aren't clones any more.
They don't imply that, they flat out say it. And so what? How does the idea that they're kidnapped as children and put through psychological conditioning to be cannon fodder not support the idea that they're denied crucial life skills?

Zacharious-khan said:
I personally buy into the idea that a teenager who's hellbent on joining the resistance and works with heavy machinery and at least had time and reason to be instructed after reaching the Rebel base may know how to fly a ship designed for one person better than a girl flying a half broken ship designed to be piloted by two.
Jesus, dude. You're saying Luke got sat down and trained to fly one of the Rebellion's rare, prized fighter jets off-screen in the amount of time it took the Death Star to fly to Yavin, but there's no way Rey could have been trained to fly the Millennium Falcon off-screen?

Jesus, dude.

Zacharious-khan said:
Here's the biggest problem with all of these things is that things go too well, way too often without explanation.
Welcome to the Star Wars universe. It's children's theater. Deus ex machina is the rule, not the exception.

Zacharious-khan said:
That's a really fancy way to say "could feel the right time to fire missiles."
That is not at all what I said, and I really don't appreciate you distorting my words like that.

Zacharious-khan said:
This wasn't impossible.
Wedge disagrees, and as far as we can prove based on the guy who took the shot and missed, Wedge was right. The only person who made the shot was the nascent space-wizard with the ghost of a space wizard whispering in his ear.

Zacharious-khan said:
If they had thought you needed psychokinetic powers to make the shot they probably wouldn't have used that plan at all.
They were not in a position to make better plans. The Death Star was already flying toward them.

Zacharious-khan said:
What would have been the point of any of the other pilots even trying?
If the only way you can live is to make an impossible shot, then either you take the impossible shot and hope for the best, or you go blow your brains out so the Empire won't have the satisfaction. I assume most of the Rebels would rather take the impossible shot than suck a blaster's dick.

Zacharious-khan said:
What does [matter] is her ability to best Kylo (a person trained by both Luke and Snoke) in Force-related activities three times to one and learn how to Jedi mind trick on the spot.
Luke taught himself plenty of Jedi tricks without training. Obi-Wan damn sure wasn't the one who taught him how to use telekinesis on his lightsaber on Hoth. Rey isn't doing anything Luke didn't do, and as for beating Kylo Ren, so what? If she's a Mary Sue for that, then Chewbacca is an even bigger one for managing to shoot him in the gut while he had his lightsaber out after roaring to warn him the shot was coming.

Chewbacca gut-shooting him is possible because Snoke was right when he warned Kylo Ren he wasn't ready for the challenge of killing his own father, and that emotional turmoil cost him so much of his focus he couldn't use the Force to block the laser blast or even to slap Finn around. When he fought Rey, he still had that weakened ability to use the Force and he was bleeding out from a gut wound, and to say that Rey won the fight is frankly not supported. She didn't win: Kylo Ren survived. All she did was fight a wounded man to a draw. What an accomplishment that is.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
WinterWyvern said:
As I've mentioned before: the reason I'm not a fan with both ideas is that currently we're NOT having both ideas.
We might start to cheaply gender-swap or race-swap existing heroes only AFTER we've got enough original and new female or non-white lead characters in comic books and other medias.
Or, you know, the other way around might be more pragmatic since it will lead to normalisation of women in comics.
 

Entaris

New member
Jan 14, 2016
9
0
0
I would say it is not a feminist agenda if a character is female.

However if the character is perfect, flawless, and who only has the defining features of being perfect and female, they may perhaps be feminist agenda.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
The main reason people cry about "the feminist agenda" is, as you put it:

It's shitty poor writing.
Outside of places like 4chan (which is hard to take seriously considering people are TRYING to be edgelords there) most people don't have much of a problem with female characters until the shitty writing comes in. People don't ***** about the new, improved Lara Croft or the MC from Bayonetta or Samus Aran (except when the Team Ninja game made her more dependent on her father figure). People ranting about the "feminist agenda" usually ***** about characters used as pure political commentary, or female characters who feel like token gestures, because token gestures suck and most political commentary sucks because the writers are usually too busy being ten miles up their own asses.

Of course you also get some blatant misogyny thrown in every now and again, which is what rags like The Mary Sue/Kotaku hold up as an example of "EVERYTHING WRONG WITH GAMING TODAY" so that they can get more attention, which the anti-feminists then point to and go "FEMINISTS RUINING MUH GAMING" and thus the glorious circlejerk continues on. Meanwhile the actual problem (shitty writing) continues to go on unaddressed, and gamers can only wait to see whether developers will learn to do better.

Since writing consistently seems to be one of the worst elements in games, I'm not holding my breath on that one.
 

s0denone

New member
Apr 25, 2008
1,195
0
0
scotth266 said:
The main reason people cry about "the feminist agenda" is, as you put it:

It's shitty poor writing.
Outside of places like 4chan (which is hard to take seriously considering people are TRYING to be edgelords there) most people don't have much of a problem with female characters until the shitty writing comes in. People don't ***** about the new, improved Lara Croft or the MC from Bayonetta or Samus Aran (except when the Team Ninja game made her more dependent on her father figure). People ranting about the "feminist agenda" usually ***** about characters used as pure political commentary, or female characters who feel like token gestures, because token gestures suck and most political commentary sucks because the writers are usually too busy being ten miles up their own asses.

Of course you also get some blatant misogyny thrown in every now and again, which is what rags like The Mary Sue/Kotaku hold up as an example of "EVERYTHING WRONG WITH GAMING TODAY" so that they can get more attention, which the anti-feminists then point to and go "FEMINISTS RUINING MUH GAMING" and thus the glorious circlejerk continues on. Meanwhile the actual problem (shitty writing) continues to go on unaddressed, and gamers can only wait to see whether developers will learn to do better.

Since writing consistently seems to be one of the worst elements in games, I'm not holding my breath on that one.
Aye aye, captain.

The crux here is that the overwhelming majority doesn't give a shit about the gender or sex of a particular character, as long as that character is well written and developed. The problem is when it isn't. It may very well not be "feminist/malechauvinist propagande" but the character will appear to serve no function aside from incite debate and being controversial.

Having a gay dude in a film is great, as long as he has other defining character traits aside from simply being "the gay guy"; Having a strong-willed, imposing woman in a film is great, as long as she has more depth than the classical butch Hollywoodian. Same goes with all character archetypes.

As it so happens, female protagonists and important characters are a huge deal right now, so they are being included willy-nilly and at a much higher rate. That means that there will be several instances of them being poorly written and appearing as the "token female character" in some situation. The problem isn't the Hollywood is feminist or has some kind of ulterior motive; Hollywood just wants to make money. There's money is female protagonists right now. The poorly written ones aren't propaganda, they are just poorly written. Just like all the uninteresting male ones.

But that doesn't change the fact that to the uninitiated, Hollywood's attempt to cash in on the female character-craze might will appears to have some underlying problem. Money talks.
 

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
2,555
1,215
118
Country
Nigeria
scotth266 said:
The main reason people cry about "the feminist agenda" is, as you put it:

It's shitty poor writing.
Outside of places like 4chan (which is hard to take seriously considering people are TRYING to be edgelords there) most people don't have much of a problem with female characters until the shitty writing comes in. People don't ***** about the new, improved Lara Croft or the MC from Bayonetta or Samus Aran (except when the Team Ninja game made her more dependent on her father figure). People ranting about the "feminist agenda" usually ***** about characters used as pure political commentary, or female characters who feel like token gestures, because token gestures suck and most political commentary sucks because the writers are usually too busy being ten miles up their own asses.

Of course you also get some blatant misogyny thrown in every now and again, which is what rags like The Mary Sue/Kotaku hold up as an example of "EVERYTHING WRONG WITH GAMING TODAY" so that they can get more attention, which the anti-feminists then point to and go "FEMINISTS RUINING MUH GAMING" and thus the glorious circlejerk continues on. Meanwhile the actual problem (shitty writing) continues to go on unaddressed, and gamers can only wait to see whether developers will learn to do better.

Since writing consistently seems to be one of the worst elements in games, I'm not holding my breath on that one.
I'm confused here. Are you trying to say that the Mary Sue or Kotaku never address bad writing in their articles? Cause they have. I've read enough of them to know.

As for political commentary, there is no such thing as an apolitical work. All art is propaganda, regardless of whether or not that's what the creator intended.
 

Gengisgame

New member
Feb 15, 2015
276
0
0
wizzy555 said:
Because the other side do exactly the same thing and demonstrated there is an audience for idealogical outrage.
I like this guy.

Every female lead outside of something that girls traditionally like is part of someone's feminist agenda "the female character girls need", so you could say they are all tainted from inception, sort of like how the above poster pointed out how some people have been conditioned to resent white male leads.