Why so Popular?
- Thread starter Ken_J
- Start date
Recommended Videos
halo because when the first one came out it was different... and new... and thus people jumped on it and swore blindly to follow it to the death!!!
well... at least thats what i think... lol
EDIT:
purely because i have never been able to do this before.....
first.... XD
well... at least thats what i think... lol
EDIT:
purely because i have never been able to do this before.....
first.... XD
Hmm. This is pretty easy.
Because people like them.
Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
Because people like them.
Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.
Half-Life: good story and puzzles and other fun items.
Halo: was good when it first was released and it spawned many a fanboy who still follow it like a religion
Harry Potter: the christians said it was evil and demonic and people bought to defy them
Halo: was good when it first was released and it spawned many a fanboy who still follow it like a religion
Harry Potter: the christians said it was evil and demonic and people bought to defy them
Here's a question for you Mr OP.
Why do you think the search button is so unpopular?
It would save so many repetitive threads if more people bothered to use it. It even finds relevant threads nowadays, which is better than it used to be.
Why do you think the search button is so unpopular?
It would save so many repetitive threads if more people bothered to use it. It even finds relevant threads nowadays, which is better than it used to be.
Half-Life because both games were very advanced for their time, and included a lot of innovative and original gameplay elements, as well a story that was good and didn't get in the way of the game.
Halo, which I don't like either, was the first console FPS to offer such a solid MP experience and to have very easy to handle controls.
Harry Potter because they're great books, which are perfectly paced, don't shy away from vocabulary while not being pretentious about it, because, like Tolkien, Rowling uses old folk myths and legends and adapts them to her own world. Also, they created a universe that is fantastic in theme but believable in its execution.
Halo, which I don't like either, was the first console FPS to offer such a solid MP experience and to have very easy to handle controls.
Harry Potter because they're great books, which are perfectly paced, don't shy away from vocabulary while not being pretentious about it, because, like Tolkien, Rowling uses old folk myths and legends and adapts them to her own world. Also, they created a universe that is fantastic in theme but believable in its execution.
Halo? Different? New? How? It is a good(not great) FPS. On a console. That is all. It did nothing new or different. Besides maybe auto regenerating health, which is a terrible idea. It also had a good story, for the first one. The main character Master Chief is also pretty awesome.vamp rocks said:
As for Harry Potter that is easy. The books are a relatively well written series of books that young people can relate to as it is based in a school.
Half-Life? Well, that is easy too. It was one of the first FPS's with a story that was more than just "hey look, monsters, kill them". It also broke new grounds in terms of graphics and gameplay too.
Because people like them and they are easy to get into. People have different reasons for liking things, not everyone is going to have the same reason.