Why the big swords anyway?

WrcklessIntent

New member
Apr 16, 2009
513
0
0
Omikron009 said:
I always wondered why a character would choose to wield a sword when guns are around as well. Realistically, a gun can do just as much damage as a sword, if not more. It makes no sense.
I think this is the best of both.
 

LarenzoAOG

New member
Apr 28, 2010
1,683
0
0
Game designers are overcompinsating because all there friends are in college on football scholarships kissing large breasted women on the mouth on their expensive yacths.
 

Cheery Lunatic

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,565
0
0
People already beat me to the immature "overcompensating" joke. Aw, shucks.

OT: Meh, people are just naturally awed by larger things.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Magnatek said:
To my knowledge, giant swords like that were once used to potentially break down the cavalry of enemy troops. The sheer force it took to swing those things could allegedly take down a horse. Would a small sword have a similar effect? That's not likely. Granted, in reality, it would be very hard to swing a giant sword like that, and would most likely require two hands. Either way, this is only to my current knowledge. If it helps explain things, then you're welcome.
I doubt this. War horses weigh in excess of 1200-1400 pounds. Chance you can knock one over with a sword, no matter how large: doubtful.

Big swords like this are useless. A Claymore is about as large as a fully bladed weapon can get without being utterly useless, and even those have massive draw backs with makes their use... questionable.

EDIT: Video games use them as a visual effect, nothing more.
 

nolongerhere

Winter is coming.
Nov 19, 2008
860
0
0
Why?


Realll, they're just so stupidly over the top that it's fun. They're completely impractical and unrealistic, but, as AlphaOmega said, Rule of Cool applies.
 

Sightless Wisdom

Resident Cynic
Jul 24, 2009
2,552
0
0
Big shiny things that kill people...why the fuck not?

Basically, they look really impressive and they make fairly good symbols.
 

Magnatek

A Miserable Pile of Honesty
Jul 17, 2009
1,695
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
Magnatek said:
To my knowledge, giant swords like that were once used to potentially break down the cavalry of enemy troops. The sheer force it took to swing those things could allegedly take down a horse. Would a small sword have a similar effect? That's not likely. Granted, in reality, it would be very hard to swing a giant sword like that, and would most likely require two hands. Either way, this is only to my current knowledge. If it helps explain things, then you're welcome.
I doubt this. War horses weigh in excess of 1200-1400 pounds. Chance you can knock one over with a sword, no matter how large: doubtful.

Big swords like this are useless. A Claymore is about as large as a fully bladed weapon can get without being utterly useless, and even those have massive draw backs with makes their use... questionable.
I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Magnatek said:
I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
I'm actually working on it. Nothing yet.
 

feather240

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,921
0
0
zpfanatic81195 said:
why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/HTTP-Cookie-Google.svg
 

LordFisheh

New member
Dec 31, 2008
478
0
0
I guess they're supposed to look awesome, rule of cool and all that.

Personally though, methinks they just look silly. Not being a stickler for realism, but giant swords just appear... odd.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Magnatek said:
I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
Found it.

You are thinking of the Chinese Pudao, a sword like weapon used to cut a horses legs (Not strike them down). I say sword like because well... its a damn pole arm.



Basically... it has nothing to do with size or weight, but merely a weapon long enough where the horse you just cut wont crush you under its weight.
 

Eponet

New member
Nov 18, 2009
480
0
0
Because the characters that use them have super strength; and fight monsters with hides so thick that a gun capable of penetrating would be a cannon, and take just as long to reload.

In regard to large vs small; maybe it keeps it from breaking as quickly when being thrown around by said super strength.

That was just my justification to FF7; no idea for the others though.
 

arcticphoenix95

New member
Apr 30, 2010
455
0
0
feather240 said:
zpfanatic81195 said:
why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/HTTP-Cookie-Google.svg
is it....CHOCOLATE CHIP!?! (it looks like he covers his dick compensater.....with his OWN USED toilet paper.
 

mtk2a

New member
Sep 11, 2008
129
0
0
Besides the obvious Freudian connection?

I think the image of a person wielding a giant sword is used to convey the idea that the person wielding it possesses enormous strength and power. This idea also connects the sword to the wielder because, as often is the case in these stories, only a select few or a certain individual could actually wield it.

The better example from FFVII, in my mind, is Sephiroth's over-sized katana, Masamune. This sword was iconic both within the game lore and outside, because Sephiroth was known as being the only person strong enough to wield it. Therefore it became a symbol of his power.
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Characters wielding excessively large swords most likely are compensating for something. For example, Cloud Strife in FF7 has that big sword that is linked in the OP, but he's... he's kinda emo and wierd.

I don't know. I don't really understand the whole gigantic oversized weapon thing.
 

Magnatek

A Miserable Pile of Honesty
Jul 17, 2009
1,695
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
Magnatek said:
I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
Found it.

You are thinking of the Chinese Pudao, a sword like weapon used to cut a horses legs (Not strike them down). I say sword like because well... its a damn pole arm.



Basically... it has nothing to do with size or weight, but merely a weapon long enough where the horse you just cut wont crush you under its weight.
I knew it had something to do with the legs, with either smashing them or cutting them. Thanks for looking it up.
 

feather240

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,921
0
0
Who here has read Beowulf? If you've read it you would've known that big swords are awesome.

zpfanatic81195 said:
feather240 said:
zpfanatic81195 said:
why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/HTTP-Cookie-Google.svg
is it....CHOCOLATE CHIP!?! (it looks like he covers his dick compensater.....with his OWN USED toilet paper.
Meh, better then there being a market for that kind of thing. <.<