I think this is the best of both.Omikron009 said:I always wondered why a character would choose to wield a sword when guns are around as well. Realistically, a gun can do just as much damage as a sword, if not more. It makes no sense.

I think this is the best of both.Omikron009 said:I always wondered why a character would choose to wield a sword when guns are around as well. Realistically, a gun can do just as much damage as a sword, if not more. It makes no sense.
I doubt this. War horses weigh in excess of 1200-1400 pounds. Chance you can knock one over with a sword, no matter how large: doubtful.Magnatek said:To my knowledge, giant swords like that were once used to potentially break down the cavalry of enemy troops. The sheer force it took to swing those things could allegedly take down a horse. Would a small sword have a similar effect? That's not likely. Granted, in reality, it would be very hard to swing a giant sword like that, and would most likely require two hands. Either way, this is only to my current knowledge. If it helps explain things, then you're welcome.
I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.AccursedTheory said:I doubt this. War horses weigh in excess of 1200-1400 pounds. Chance you can knock one over with a sword, no matter how large: doubtful.Magnatek said:To my knowledge, giant swords like that were once used to potentially break down the cavalry of enemy troops. The sheer force it took to swing those things could allegedly take down a horse. Would a small sword have a similar effect? That's not likely. Granted, in reality, it would be very hard to swing a giant sword like that, and would most likely require two hands. Either way, this is only to my current knowledge. If it helps explain things, then you're welcome.
Big swords like this are useless. A Claymore is about as large as a fully bladed weapon can get without being utterly useless, and even those have massive draw backs with makes their use... questionable.
I'm actually working on it. Nothing yet.Magnatek said:I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.zpfanatic81195 said:why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
Found it.Magnatek said:I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
is it....CHOCOLATE CHIP!?! (it looks like he covers his dick compensater.....with his OWN USED toilet paper.feather240 said:O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.zpfanatic81195 said:why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/HTTP-Cookie-Google.svg
I knew it had something to do with the legs, with either smashing them or cutting them. Thanks for looking it up.AccursedTheory said:Found it.Magnatek said:I know. Hence "to my knowledge". I have absolutely no way to confirm this, but if it's something you are interested in, I'm sure you have more ways than me.
You are thinking of the Chinese Pudao, a sword like weapon used to cut a horses legs (Not strike them down). I say sword like because well... its a damn pole arm.
![]()
Basically... it has nothing to do with size or weight, but merely a weapon long enough where the horse you just cut wont crush you under its weight.
Meh, better then there being a market for that kind of thing. <.<zpfanatic81195 said:is it....CHOCOLATE CHIP!?! (it looks like he covers his dick compensater.....with his OWN USED toilet paper.feather240 said:O.O You good sir, have earned a cookie.zpfanatic81195 said:why does the sword in pic 2 have toilet paper on it?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/HTTP-Cookie-Google.svg