Why You Should Have Your Eye On Florida
- Thread starter ObsidianJones
- Start date
This is the first time in 6 pages that anyone has used the word "enforcing". It's not surprising to me that you aren't in tune with my opinions since you don't ever read them with the goal of comprehension.
You used quotation marks around a word I didn't say in a post that had a whole lot of condescension for not actually disputing me in any meaningful way. Like, I could ask what world you do think we live in, but one would imagine if you cared to contribute, you'd have done so in the first place. That's not really your M.O.
We live in a world where the Texas AG office is investigating a CPS agent for child abuse because they have a 16 year old trans daughter, and you think that's just swell. Next?
But because you didn't like what I wrote, or didn't have an actual response, you engage in yet more pathetic semantics over what precise word you used to misrepresent Silvanus's argument as being gender essentialist.
So which is it? Do you actually believe a woman can have a penis or not? How rigid is your binary?
EDIT: What's you hypothetical best case scenario here? The 16 year old is stripped from her parents, placed into foster care, and tortured into being a dude?
Hell, combine this with Florida's don't say gay bill: teacher finds out a kid is questioning their gender, has to report it to their parents, and if the parents don't beat it out of them, they get sued for child abuse? That a good outcome in your world?
Last edited:
Hell, how many trans kids are gonna "detransition", to the delight of conservatives and terfs alike, getting stuck with a puberty and body they hate because they had to spend years pretending to be cis just so their parents don't go to prison? You can just smell the compassion and concern for children in the air. Can't wait for this to catch the tomboys and weird dudes with long hair because this shit always has a splash zone and there's nothing more petty than a high-school parent with a grudge. Just call the cops on that weird libtard you don't like because their daughter wears pants and you're "just concerned" she's getting gender affirming care. That shit never goes wrong for people that don't fit white European standards of beauty.
You're not adding anything to the discussion. Accusing me of wanting trans kids beaten isn't a counterpoint, it's just belligerence. There is no meaningful response to belligerence. It'd be like trying to make a thoughtful response while playing games online to the 12 year old saying he's going to do terrible things to my mom.
Aww man, I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by describing exactly how these laws are going to go down. Are *already* going down, and how you seem to be okay with that
You're not describing what is or will happen. You're not even trying to. You're saying ridiculous nonsense like "call the cops... because their daughter wears pants" so that all the least useful forum members can hit the little thumbs up and validate your blind hatred.
Uh huh. Tell that to every butch lesbian thrown out of establishments due to the policing of anti-trans bathroom bills, or the CPS employee actually currently being investigated for child abuse
Just because you don't want to believe these things happen doesn't mean that they don't actually happen. Hilarious accusation of "blind hatred" though.
Well poisoning 101 - use words that paint your opponent as an unhinged seething maniac beyond the soothing touch of reason that you offer.
At some point, you're going to argue with MysteriousGX about something, and you're gonna think "man, this guy sucks, it's basically just all namecalling." Ya'll like to act like my judgments are disingenuous until you actually end up interacting with one another.
Do you believe that the CPS agent with the 16 year old trans kid has committed child abuse and would you consider it a social and moral good to put the parent in prison and stick the kid in the system, where they will be forced to detransition?
It's what Texas conservatives are trying to do. Just because somebody tries to stop them doesn't change intent. So answer the question
Judge temporarily blocks CPS abuse investigation of treatment for transgender child
President Joe Biden calls new policy implemented by Gov. Greg Abbott "government...
Facts don't care about your feelings
Deniability is a big part of the appeal for people who support these discriminatory policies. The simple fact is they don't actually have the stomach to destroy families, so they come up with excuses to not give a shit when it does happen, all the while denying to the opposition that the damage is being done at all.
Just noting that the mum was immediately put on administrative leave and might lose her job even though the judge postponed the investigation.It's what Texas conservatives are trying to do. Just because somebody tries to stop them doesn't change intent. So answer the question
Judge temporarily blocks CPS abuse investigation of treatment for transgender child
President Joe Biden calls new policy implemented by Gov. Greg Abbott "government...www.houstonchronicle.com
Facts don't care about your feelings
I'd also note that the laws has been out how long and this already happened...
And this ruling only covers this specific instance and can't cover anyone else
That's what you believe Texas conservatives are trying to do. The powerfully toothless ambiguity of the Texas Attorney General's opinion strongly implies otherwise. If you'd care to criticize their shameless political theater, I will not dispute that, but you are choosing instead to read "these things can be child abusive" as "these things ARE child abuse and everyone involved should be in prison."
No, he said those things *are* child abuse. We *already covered this*. You need that to not be true for some goddamned reason though, so fuck reality I guess.
Is the resulting investigation of this exact thing *the man your are defending is bragging about* just an accidental fucky-wucky? A silly mistake that happened despite them not wanting it to? Did the man who declared this to be child abuse not actually mean it?
What is your actual fucking argument right now, ignore my own eyes and ears when they see and hear the people saying this is a good thing? Just straight up 1984 this shit because you are uncomfortable with the direct results of your stated policy goals?
Nosy neighbors fucking up the lives of people they don't like for having different politics, working as intended. Had to abuse the kid to save the kid