I'm also an atheist. The one thing that struck me with Buddhism is that there are sophisticated concepts in Buddhist philosophy that predate equivalents in western philosophy by a couple thousand years. It's only recently that secular philosophers have caught up and begun to grapple with Buddhist observations about identity and consciousness. In philosophy of mind we've slowly gone from the mind being a discrete 'soul' (as with Locke) to the mind being a 'bag of tricks' that essentially creates a narrative because it's useful (Dennet). The skepticism of the mind as it appears to be in 'first-person' originates in Buddhist philosophy.Deviate said:I guess, if people HAVE to have a religion, then they might as well go for Wicca or Buddhism. It's still blithering idiocy, but at least it's not the sheer evil of the currently mainstream religions. I doubt I'll ever see a Wiccan use religion as an excuse for violence, at least.
It amazes me that Buddhist scholars made solid observations about complex mental phenomena when my ancestral scholars were arguing about exactly how many plagues god smote the Egyptians with during the exodus. (600 according to Rabbi Akiva.)
I obviously don't think they're right about the supernatural bits and reincarnation, but that's pretty damn good for 'blithering idiocy.'