Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
Also, likely becauseBalobo said:Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
Correcting you.coolkirb said:correct me if Im wrong but if the Wii U does half as well as the wii is it not still a huge succes? I mean if they sell half as much they still sold more then the ps3.
Nop, sorry. The average person is smart enough to turn 3D off if they're experiencing headaches. The 3D isn't the only reason to buy the system, similar to how people who don't have HDTVs bought Xbox 360s and PS3s (which use HD as a huge selling point).Crono1973 said:Also, likely becauseBalobo said:Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
- the 3D effect causes headaches in some people meaning they can't play it for very long
- the battery life is terrible
- some people can't see the 3D effect so can't justify spending all that money when the main feature is inaccessible to them.
- the price is too high
Here's a better idea. If you can't enjoy the 3D effect, the 3DS is not for you. That's what many people have probably decided. Most won't change their mind in the future.Balobo said:Nop, sorry. The average person is smart enough to turn 3D off if they're experiencing headaches. The 3D isn't the only reason to buy the system, similar to how people who don't have HDTVs bought Xbox 360s and PS3s (which use HD as a huge selling point).Crono1973 said:Also, likely becauseBalobo said:Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
- the 3D effect causes headaches in some people meaning they can't play it for very long
- the battery life is terrible
- some people can't see the 3D effect so can't justify spending all that money when the main feature is inaccessible to them.
- the price is too high
I agree with the battery life and I already addressed the cost issue.
Well right now the 3D is the only reason to buy the 3DS. It's called the 3DS... The average person is smart enough to turn off the 3D effect yeah, but that's essentially turning off what you payed $250 to see the device do. There's not even a reputable line up out, or on the horizon for the 3DS anytime soon. The only games that look worth buying a 3DS for are remakes. Why should I spend $250 to play LoZ: Ocarina of Time in 3D? Or StarFox64. And the horrible battery life will ruin MGS3's remake (well so will the fact that it's an M rated game on the 3DS. Look at what happened to GTA Chinatown Wars). And Tales of the Abyss 3DS is the only other game worth mentioning. Games we`ve already played. With a 3D gimmick on it. Sorry but the PS Vita seems to be the handheld worth it`s $250 price tag.Balobo said:Nop, sorry. The average person is smart enough to turn 3D off if they're experiencing headaches. The 3D isn't the only reason to buy the system, similar to how people who don't have HDTVs bought Xbox 360s and PS3s (which use HD as a huge selling point).Crono1973 said:Also, likely becauseBalobo said:Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
- the 3D effect causes headaches in some people meaning they can't play it for very long
- the battery life is terrible
- some people can't see the 3D effect so can't justify spending all that money when the main feature is inaccessible to them.
- the price is too high
I agree with the battery life and I already addressed the cost issue.
You bring about good points but one thing. If Nintendo decides to make games on the 3DS that heavily use the 3D feature, how would they market those games? That's the biggest issue for the 3DS, it's unmarketable for it's games.Crono1973 said:Here's a better idea. If you can't enjoy the 3D effect, the 3DS is not for you. That's what many people have probably decided. Most won't change their mind in the future.Balobo said:Nop, sorry. The average person is smart enough to turn 3D off if they're experiencing headaches. The 3D isn't the only reason to buy the system, similar to how people who don't have HDTVs bought Xbox 360s and PS3s (which use HD as a huge selling point).Crono1973 said:Also, likely becauseBalobo said:Likely because of the mediocre line up (which will improve), its cost, and the fact that it was launched in the middle of the year (aka not being helped by the holiday rush).Crono1973 said:The 3DS isn't doing so well either. It seems the gimmicks have been worn out.
- the 3D effect causes headaches in some people meaning they can't play it for very long
- the battery life is terrible
- some people can't see the 3D effect so can't justify spending all that money when the main feature is inaccessible to them.
- the price is too high
I agree with the battery life and I already addressed the cost issue.
3D movies are a gimmick and so is 3D gaming. If people don't think it's worth an extra $3 to watch a movie in 3D then they won't think it worth it to pay $250 for a 3D handheld. The 3DS MAY take off in the future when it gets better games like the DS did but unlike the DS it has extra baggage holding it down, 3D. I think of it like the Wii, it's controller ruined some of it's best games. As an example, would NSMBW have been better without the waggle? You bet! How about other games where the waggle was just added to force the Wiimote innovation into games that didn't benefit from it. Same thing will happen with the 3DS. The 3D is exclusive, not inclusive.
Actually, people do think it's worth it to pay an extra three dollars to watch a 3D movie. That's why they do that.Crono1973 said:3D movies are a gimmick and so is 3D gaming. If people don't think it's worth an extra $3 to watch a movie in 3D then they won't think it worth it to pay $250 for a 3D handheld. The 3DS MAY take off in the future when it gets better games like the DS did but unlike the DS it has extra baggage holding it down, 3D. I think of it like the Wii, it's controller ruined some of it's best games. As an example, would NSMBW have been better without the waggle? You bet! How about other games where the waggle was just added to force the Wiimote innovation into games that didn't benefit from it. Same thing will happen with the 3DS. The 3D is exclusive, not inclusive.
But the only games announced for the Vita are ports/rehashes of PS3 games. Why would you pay 250 dollars for a handheld that has the same games as a console that has been out for much longer? Both handhelds share this problem, it will be corrected over time.AzrealMaximillion said:Well right now the 3D is the only reason to buy the 3DS. It's called the 3DS... The average person is smart enough to turn off the 3D effect yeah, but that's essentially turning off what you payed $250 to see the device do. There's not even a reputable line up out, or on the horizon for the 3DS anytime soon. The only games that look worth buying a 3DS for are remakes. Why should I spend $250 to play LoZ: Ocarina of Time in 3D? Or StarFox64. And the horrible battery life will ruin MGS3's remake (well so will the fact that it's an M rated game on the 3DS. Look at what happened to GTA Chinatown Wars). And Tales of the Abyss 3DS is the only other game worth mentioning. Games we`ve already played. With a 3D gimmick on it. Sorry but the PS Vita seems to be the handheld worth it`s $250 price tag.
But the problem with this business model is that the new console is as expensive or more expensive than the competition. Since it doesnt have a comparable list of features now it will run into the issue of "the old one is better" and people will just go for whichever console offers the best.Baresark said:Snip
Third parties seem to be pretty excited about the system. That might convert some people.Acidwell said:But the problem with this business model is that the new console is as expensive or more expensive than the competition. Since it doesnt have a comparable list of features now it will run into the issue of "the old one is better" and people will just go for whichever console offers the best.Baresark said:Snip
Also exclusives? I can tell you the exclusives right now; one of each of the following areas. Zelda, Mario, Metroid and possibly pokemon. That will not convert anyone. It will get the part of the market that bought a wii for the exact same reason, a small part of the people who bought a wii.
It's dying, like it does everytime Hollywood throws it out there. It's interesting for a while then people see it for what it is. 3D is a short term gimmick. Building a handheld around that gimmick was a bad idea.Actually, people do think it's worth it to pay an extra three dollars to watch a 3D movie. That's why they do that.
True but third parties for wii tend to develop really bad knock offs of other games. But you never know somebody might pull something out.Balobo said:Third parties seem to be pretty excited about the system. That might convert some people.Acidwell said:But the problem with this business model is that the new console is as expensive or more expensive than the competition. Since it doesnt have a comparable list of features now it will run into the issue of "the old one is better" and people will just go for whichever console offers the best.Baresark said:Snip
Also exclusives? I can tell you the exclusives right now; one of each of the following areas. Zelda, Mario, Metroid and possibly pokemon. That will not convert anyone. It will get the part of the market that bought a wii for the exact same reason, a small part of the people who bought a wii.
It was mearly a sales figure comparison since people repeatedly label the N64 and Cube a failure. N64 marks the first time Nintendo was beaten directly in a generation (soundly by the the PS1), but my point was that it still sold reasonably, and made them a lot of money. If it's a failure, it's the sort I'd like to have more often, lol.Crono1973 said:The N64 was not in competition against the Genesis, it was competing against the PS1, and it lost. When you say 3 in a row, would that be the Wii, the 3DS and the Wii-U? The 3DS hasn't really sold all that well. If you mean the DS, Wii and Wii-U then why are leaving out the 3DS. The "in a row" part is important here.
Don't cringe when you met my mother. She's a lovely lady. She just happens to love wii bowling, wii fit and that game with the ninja gingerbread dude.uguito-93 said:I still cringe whenever i remember all the people I've met who only bought it for wii sports and haven't bought anything else for it.
Depends how define failure I guess. I say all consoles are compared to their competitors, same for handhelds.Rhedd said:It was mearly a sales figure comparison since people repeatedly label the N64 and Cube a failure. N64 marks the first time Nintendo was beaten directly in a generation (soundly by the the PS1), but my point was that it still sold reasonably, and made them a lot of money. If it's a failure, it's the sort I'd like to have more often, lol.Crono1973 said:The N64 was not in competition against the Genesis, it was competing against the PS1, and it lost. When you say 3 in a row, would that be the Wii, the 3DS and the Wii-U? The 3DS hasn't really sold all that well. If you mean the DS, Wii and Wii-U then why are leaving out the 3DS. The "in a row" part is important here.
And I guess I omitted 3DS cos I didn't want to muddy up the paragraph with qualifications about the 3DS creating a fourth "lucky strike" should that prove the case, lol. Which I'm not sure it will yet either. We really don't know what's going to happen with the 3DS yet, it's a difficult product to market, coupled with a weak starting lineup, but lets not forget it's been out for less than 3 months in most territories. Again, time will tell.
that will be true if you consider that stuff like wii-fit are actual "games" and not only the wii nintendo in general has been pushing this "non-games" like brainage, nintendogs, etc and they been moving millions of copies of them, i dont consider those "games" theyr more like especialized time wasting applications like we see on PC all the time (cough*-*farmville*-*cough)666Chaos said:But playing games is pretty much the only thing that you can do on the wii. The only reason anybody even purchased a wii was to play games.Logan Westbrook said:Jaffe felt that a significant portion of the Wii's install base had purchased it as something other than a gamer device.