photog212 said:
godofallu said:
I could talk all day about this issue, and my take on it, but who would want to read more?
Me.
I'm very pro union, so I support the efforts that the protesters are making. I remember the days when the words 'pro-union' were not used in a negative way or as an insult.
I boasted yesterday of "talking all day" if i had to, but that was yesterday.
If you're pro union I must warn you, our governor is a follower of the tea party, which is extremely anti union. Our governor also dropped out of college his senior year and has no degree.
Honestly next step on his agenda (besides seperating UW-Madison from the UW system) is probably going to be moving towards a right to work state. Basically this means that workers don't have to pay union dues, they choose if they do or not. That leads to less union members actually paying, and subsequently less bargaining power for unions.
Now 22 other states already have the right to work setup, and life would go on even if we had it. That said unions keep wages up, benefits, and working conditions.
It seems our governors current plan is to move to weaken unions and setup corporate tax cuts in order to coax businesses to move to WI. The problem there is that the businesses that would be moving in don't bring high paying technical jobs, which is what we should want for ourselves and our future.
As far as the threats of firing people who protest, and the splitting up of the Milwaukee public school system goes shame on him.
Personally I feel the bill is overly hurtful to state workers, since they already get paid less then their public sector equivalent. Let's face it state workers have far less salary, the cheap healthcare/benefits partially make up for the loss in pay but not enough to make the two jobs equal. A cut on their pay is harsh since they already make less, but demonizing them as the cause of our troubles is where the mayor really crosses the lines.
A change in sales tax from 5% to 5.05% is enough to equal the cash saved by cutting these state workers pay/benefits. It would also spread the burden equally, and without demonizing a minority group. It would also hurt out economy less, when you hurt the incomes of a group of people so severely they spend less. A sales tax of a penny, on the other hand, won't lead to consumers spending less.
There are many ways to fix the budget, this "plan" has been proposed as the only way. That is simply put a lie. This collective bargaining being removed might be acceptable if there was a time limit IMO, say 2 years. That way the governor could argue he just wants to cut costs without spending tons of cash negotiating with powerful unions. But taking away these bargaining rights for an indefinite period of time? Not fair or smart.