Tom Goldman said:
Duran says: "There was no snag, I backed my claim legally, I am not stupid, I know the law. I did it but anyone else could have done it, it simply occurred to me first." She plans on charging a fee to anyone that "uses the Sun," giving half to Spain, 20% to Spain's pension fund, 10% to research, 10% towards ending world hunger, and she's keeping the remainder for herself. Good luck collecting.
It wasn't mentioned what Duran meant by "using the Sun," so she could attempt to siphon funds from either Kindergartners or astronomers. It's nice that Duran wants to end world hunger, but if this generates a single penny for her I'll be really upset. You don't own the Sun, Ms. Duran, so just knock it off. Then again, it would be nice to own an acre of Sun for when I retire, just in case she actually does.
She doesn't. I know you were being facetious but property rights are an important topic.
Ownership rights are ultimately enforced by social respect more than anything else, legal papers notwithstanding. People in general tend to recognize that when you set down your plate on a table in front of a spot in a cafeteria but get up to go grab a napkin or something, it's not socially appropriate to then take "your" seat (or your food, for that matter) just because you've temporarily vacated it. And normal people don't go around stealing cars left unattended in parking lots because they're worried that they'll be arrested or that a piece of paper will magically return the cars to their rightful owners, but rather because it's an asshole thing to do that's functionally and morally equivalent to enslaving the victim for the length of time it took them to earn enough money to buy the car.
From a practical standpoint, registering ownership of an item only helps you if
a) Society writ large will enforce such a claim,
b) Questions and disputes over ownership of the item are likely, an
c) You want the strong arm of the government to force would be delinquents to respect your claim
In this case, neither a nor b don't apply. Legally she can pretend like she owns it, but in reality she doesn't own it, and legality only matters from a practical standpoint, so in fact she doesn't own it legally either.
Neferius said:
Normally I'm the last person to uphold or promote the principles of Communism...
You're not a Communist if you say some things are un-ownable.
You're a Communist if you say everything belongs to the government. Or, sorry, you "say" that everything belongs to "the Commune" or "us all" but which really translates to "everything is owned by and squandered by whichever bureaucrat gets to it first".