Vault101 said:
Mr.Numbers said:
I consider myself superior to women in the art of holding open doors, waiting politely for them to sit down first...
Wait, is that sexism or just manners and chivalry?
It's getting really friggin hard to tell with some people...
If being more courteous to the opposite gender is sexism, is considered wrong, I don't want to be right.
I also consider them less likely to be able to stand up for themselves against drunken assaults. I, however, CAN take a punch (With some exceptions, some women are pretty damn hardcore) (The first person to make a wifebeater joke I strangle through their webcam) So I'm going to do my best to defuse the situation, or defend the woman involved.
Again, if chivalry is wrong, I don't want to be right.
no offence BUT I find it somwhat annoying how this chivalry thing needs explaining
basically treating women "different" because they are women is kind of sexist, it implys that they are weak and cannot defend themselfs...and of coarse it comes from an older time...in a way I guess it was a trade off for not being able to do much
kind of like how most people dont like the "hero of the story rescues his helpless girldfreind" type thing thease days
anyway the Idea is not "chivalry" but showing respect and decency for people regardless of gender
now obviously some idoits take it the wrong way (stories of women getting offended when I guy holds the door open) but in the end Ill hold the door open for whoever needs it, and apreciate it when somone does, but I dont expect it
I think a lot of people use the term chivalry to be meaning general knightly(aspired to, seldom practiced) virtues like. Honor, decency, courtesy, mercy, and defense of those who cannot defend themselves.
It's the last part that gets easily offended feminist's panties in a knot.
Weakness in something is not an evil or a bad thing. It's like the brave knight rescuing the princess from a dragon. Why do people hate this story plot with such fervor?
It's unoriginal? Most things are. It's sexist? Why?
It's a fucking
dragon. You'd have to be pretty badass to kill a dragon.
Hell even if it's a reasonable plot that could really happen with similar character types.
Brave knight saves peasant girl from an evil lord.
It's not sexist. It's rational.
A female peasant was only slightly more likely to get brutalized by gentry than a male peasant.
A noble lord has :Better armor, weapons, horses, training,and most likely other nobles as friends with the same advantages.
The peasant of either gender are rightly screwed. As for the female most likely being weaker than the evil lord physically. Now people are just being
stupid. Female humans are generally physically weaker than male humans. This is simply biological
fact. Not
opinion,
fact. If you think otherwise you are either delusional or stupid.
It's called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism
Read that, and if you don't like it blame God, or Nature, or the universe. Oh and do us all a favor and some of you people get over yourselves.
Feminism as it stands now in western society has turned into an auto-immune diease.