Women's breasts
- Thread starter Jonluw
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I'm of the particular belief that if you're going to shape it up so nicely with clothing, then I'm going to partake of its magnificence. Whether it be a particularly well shaped rump in yoga pants, or a wonderful cleavage pushed just enough out from that too-small shirt, I'm gonna look. At least once, twice if it was enjoyable. Staring, not so much, but I'm not going to purposely look away either.Spineyguy said:
And I happen to be a lucky enough fellow that my lovely girlfriend feels the same way about it. So when done in public, even with my ladyfriend along, I'm safe. It's amazing how much more appealing your woman is when she's secure enough to let that happen.
Truly feel bad for the rest of the male population with the stuffy, "DON'T LOOK AT HER YOU PERVERT" significant others.
Sure, it's Puritan nonsense, but there's a positive, probably unforeseen consequence to it all.
Breasts are amazing.
They're amazing and they really shouldn't be. They're milk sacs for feeding infants. That's all they are. But by covering them up and keeping them out of reach, sexually repressed rule-makers have painted that shit GOLD. Breasts are those top shelf, just out of reach items, and when you finally get to them it's amazing.
Doug Stanhope put it pretty well - if women were allowed to show their boobs in public, but had to cover up their forearms, you'd lose your shit as soon as you saw a hint of wrist.
Breasts are amazing.
They're amazing and they really shouldn't be. They're milk sacs for feeding infants. That's all they are. But by covering them up and keeping them out of reach, sexually repressed rule-makers have painted that shit GOLD. Breasts are those top shelf, just out of reach items, and when you finally get to them it's amazing.
Doug Stanhope put it pretty well - if women were allowed to show their boobs in public, but had to cover up their forearms, you'd lose your shit as soon as you saw a hint of wrist.
It is to teach restraint at such an impressionable age. To build both an immunity and an appreciation.Jonluw said:
The power of breasts is (are?) overwhelming. They are like a narcotic. If you were introduced and hooked in any way other than sustenance from an early age, you would form an addiction. If not protected, we would be consumed by breasts at all hours. You would lose your drive for anything other than breasts; forgoing, work, social interaction, food, shelter. Civilization might collapse.
They are also something to appreciated. If breasts became an everyday thing, they might lose their appeal. Imagine eating ice cream all day every day. Aside from sugar rushes and brain freezes, you'd get bored with the flavor, you'd eventually yearn for something else. The same would happen with breasts.
However, combine these two factors. You would become bored of breasts, yearn for a break, but you would be unable to take yourself away. You would grow to hate that with which you were consumed.
Breasts must be contained and moderated, for the good of us all.
"With great power comes great responsibility."
Wish I had someone to tell me off for staring, as it is I just stay fixated until I'm spotted and immediately lose any chance I may have had with any girl in a 5 mile radius.IzisviAziria said:
But girls who display every inch of flesh that they possibly can (and a few they really shouldn't) and then call you a pervert for staring really need to re-evaluate their view of themselves. If I'm going to look then I'll at least be discreet about it but they should make a choice about being either assertive or modest, there really isn't much of a middle ground, and girls who try to make one are just asking for trouble.
Yup, quoted the wrong person.theultimateend said:Yes. Because I do see them all the time and I like them lots and lotsJonluw said:.
Sorry if I quoted the wrong person, I snipped it from someone quoting the quote >_>.
[user]Vault101[/user] is who you want.
oh crap, he planned it!!Thaliur said:The timing could hardly have been better though:Matthew94 said:
Its weird that total nudity isnt allowed either.
I see no reason why not. Children HAVE a gender. So hey already know what 50% of what they are looking at is. Whats the harm of learning the other side. Is life really so terrifying we need to keep children in purosefull ignorance of their own bodies? Things that will do no harm to them and are not disturbing or scaring in any way? Its a body. A person. You know what a human is. You ARE one. Perhaps sexuality is so repressed because we try and tell everyone its bad.
The netherlands has a VERY sexual liberal country. Lowest teen pregnancy rate in europe. Go figure.
I see no reason why not. Children HAVE a gender. So hey already know what 50% of what they are looking at is. Whats the harm of learning the other side. Is life really so terrifying we need to keep children in purosefull ignorance of their own bodies? Things that will do no harm to them and are not disturbing or scaring in any way? Its a body. A person. You know what a human is. You ARE one. Perhaps sexuality is so repressed because we try and tell everyone its bad.
The netherlands has a VERY sexual liberal country. Lowest teen pregnancy rate in europe. Go figure.
Well, if we were constantly exposed to breasts we probably wouldn't think as highly of them, don't you think?
There's something taboo about it that makes it all the more sweeter when you get your hands on some.
There's something taboo about it that makes it all the more sweeter when you get your hands on some.
Speaking as someone who has studied psychology in University, I've never seen proof that censorship of nudity is helpful to minors. It's just one of those things we do because otherwise we may end up in court where a bunch of sheep will send us to jail because We did not Uphold the "law".
Also, what do breasts have to do with sexuality anyway? Afaik, they're not used during the actual act of mating.
Also, what do breasts have to do with sexuality anyway? Afaik, they're not used during the actual act of mating.
Oh, gee, women doing more than just making sammiches? Why didn't I think of that.Spineyguy said:
Oh wait, I did. And "covered" isn't necessarily better, especially when you think in terms of analogous situations. Come on.
I was specifically thinking of things like mowing the lawn and other yard work on a hot day. Obviously some women would like to have support for things like jogging, so their dangly bits aren't hitting them in face (I presume this is what happens).Zachary Amaranth said:
Most guys are gonna want some support while jogging, but you don't need to have your bits swaddled in the summer heat when you're mowing the lawn and tidying up the yard.