World of Warcraft Sets the Standard for Pay MMOs, Says Champions Online Dev

Logan Westbrook

Transform, Roll Out, Etc
Feb 21, 2008
17,672
0
0
World of Warcraft Sets the Standard for Pay MMOs, Says Champions Online Dev

According to Cryptic Studios head Jack Emmert, going free-to-play is a matter of survival.

Cryptic Studios' superhero-themed Champions Online is the latest big name MMO to shed the subscription model [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/104718-Champions-Online-Going-Super-Free-to-Play] and go free-to-play. It follows the lead of games like Turbine's Lord of the Rings Online, which has reported significant increases in revenue since the change. But Emmert says that increased revenues are only part of the reason for making an MMO free-to-play. The other part, he says, is that trying to beat World of Warcraft at its own game is a fool's errand.

Emmert doesn't think that subscriptions are dead, but said that in order to make it work, a game has to be able to rival the monolithic WoW. That's a feat that he believes only the upcoming Star Wars: The Old Republic has a chance of accomplishing, and even then, it's not a sure thing. "[BioWare] can probably attract that attention," he said. "They can still get the benefit of the doubt. It's BioWare, right? We all know BioWare makes great games. They'll buy it. But then it's will the game be good enough?"

"You're skating uphill if you don't offer a free-to-play option," he added. "World of Warcraft has pretty much sucked the oxygen out of the subscription market and kind of devoured it itself."

Interestingly, in a recent interview [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/interviews/8279-BlizzCon-2010-Cataclysm-and-the-Future-of-WoW] with The Escapist, Blizzard's Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street expressed a similar sentiment, although he credited the enthusiasm of World of Warcraft players as the reason the game was still running and able to charge a fee, rather than necessarily the game itself. "Certainly the business model is something that's working for us and it's not something we're going to mess around with," he said. "It's amazing, it's remarkable to me that players still care this much ... how can [they] care this much about a game that's this old? There's so many other games that have come and gone in that time."

The beta tests for the free-to-play version of Champions Online begin this month, with plans for the service to go live early next year.

Source: Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-11-02-wow-sucked-oxygen-from-mmo-subs]




Permalink
 

SinisterGehe

New member
May 19, 2009
1,456
0
0
Blizzard made a good game and kept it still (In perspective, the hardcore players who whine it is becoming easier (inc. me) are still kicking around...)

And for me personally, I haven't found any game that would satisfy my hunger word PvE in working form. All new MMO seems to be pushing in their ads "HUGE MASSIVE OPEN WORLD !PVP!" Well I don't want that, I want PvE with my own good community. (Aion? I don't want to grind same place 5million times (Yes, you need to grind in wow, but thats mainly raid grind and raid prep grinding for me, not much else, and it is fairly fun with right community...))
And they say PvP is good in wow, I don't know about that I suck at it so I wont be able to give a statement of it...
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
You could always try fixing the broken games you leave behind Jack.

Just a thought.

Like fixing PvP in CoH/V, PvE in Champions, supporting the CCG, supporting the RPG, playtesting power combinations before release, not introducing new rules after release...general things like that.

Maybe then you could try charging for games, because all those people who paid for life time membership of Champions MIGHT be slightly miffed with all the people who get to do the same for free.

But then, you're already working on Neverwinter, which I'm sure will...have areas of rigidly defined "fun".
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,016
3,882
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
too bad aion didnt stay as awesome as the first 15 lvls were for the ones after that, it had a very strong early game but after that it went to grind town, and not even good quest grind down, it went to kill mobs to lvl up grind town that that town sucks

Im still hoping that warhammer online goes the free route, it was a damn good mmo last time I played it since they had fixed the bugs and the balance was really nice but by that point there just werent enough ppl playing it to be able to pvp as much as I wanted to, which made lvling a new char very boring
 

Dogmeat T Dingo

New member
Sep 4, 2008
115
0
0
I think Cryptic is very smart to take this stance. Say what you will about WoW, I'm not going to argue with anyone who says it has problems, but the undeniable fact is that it's pretty much the flagship of the MMO market and has held that position for its entire retail life. It would take a very special kind of MMO to wrestle that title away from it and a somewhat niche game like Champions isn't going to do that. I'm not saying CO is a bad game, quite the opposite. I like the fact it's not a "WoW clone", some of my best MMO playing experiences were on it and the community there is by and large one of the best. It's just not a "WoW killer", and frankly I'm glad it's not.
 

UnravThreads

New member
Aug 10, 2009
809
0
0
Dogmeat T Dingo said:
I think Cryptic is very smart to take this stance. Say what you will about WoW, I'm not going to argue with anyone who says it has problems, but the undeniable fact is that it's pretty much the flagship of the MMO market and has held that position for its entire retail life. It would take a very special kind of MMO to wrestle that title away from it and a somewhat niche game like Champions isn't going to do that.
Indeed. I also don't believe TOR will dethrone WoW, at least not for a number of years. Yes, BioWare can be a good developer, but I honestly believe that TOR doesn't have a chance as the market stands. Star Trek was the other major sci-fi franchise, and that MMO seems to have gone quiet (I understand it's still alive, you just don't hear a lot about it outside of Massively).

TOR would have to be very special, IMHO, to have a chance against WoW. WoW has time, an amazing developer, a huge bank balance and market dominance on its side. All these huge fantasy IPs such as Warhammer, Conan and the monolith that is LotR have attempted to jump into the market but they've just not found huge success (Although LotR wasn't bad by any standard) against WoW.

Star Wars games don't seem to do amazingly in the charts. They'll do well, but they seem to quickly drop out, and I don't know if that will happen to TOR. It could be too little, too late, or it could be an over-ambitious project that backfires on both BioWare Austin and LucasArts.
 

MaVeN1337

New member
Feb 19, 2009
438
0
0
"You're skating uphill if you don't offer a free-to-play option," he added. "World of Warcraft has pretty much sucked the oxygen out of the subscription market and kind of devoured it itself."

If i had a goddamn nickel for every freaking time I said this since 2007 I would be. filthy fucking rich.

The most upsetting part of the whole thing, Is Blizzard stole all there ideas from Everquest, then completely missed the point of an MMO and made a far too easy game. WoW Is the instant gratification, juvenile, cartoony looking, joke version of everquest and it's predecessors.

Also it spawned like a million wow clones spreading the players who quit WoW so thin, no single game could do quite as well as it should have.
 

Sixcess

New member
Feb 27, 2010
2,719
0
0
My immediate reaction when I saw the title of this article was "No shit, Sherlock."

Champions Online couldn't even beat City of Heroes. Emmert's attempt to save face by pretending they were trying to compete with WoW is laughable.
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
You could always try fixing the broken games you leave behind Jack.

Just a thought.

Like fixing PvP in CoH/V, PvE in Champions, supporting the CCG, supporting the RPG, playtesting power combinations before release, not introducing new rules after release...general things like that.

Maybe then you could try charging for games, because all those people who paid for life time membership of Champions MIGHT be slightly miffed with all the people who get to do the same for free.
Bingo. The whole process works better, whether it's Free to Play or Pay to Play when you release unbroken and complete MMOs... something Cryptic can't seem to do (no matter how loudly and intelligently the beta testers shout).
 

Red Albatross

New member
Jun 11, 2009
339
0
0
MaVeN1337 said:
"You're skating uphill if you don't offer a free-to-play option," he added. "World of Warcraft has pretty much sucked the oxygen out of the subscription market and kind of devoured it itself."

If i had a goddamn nickel for every freaking time I said this since 2007 I would be. filthy fucking rich.

The most upsetting part of the whole thing, Is Blizzard stole all there ideas from Everquest, then completely missed the point of an MMO and made a far too easy game. WoW Is the instant gratification, juvenile, cartoony looking, joke version of everquest and it's predecessors.

Also it spawned like a million wow clones spreading the players who quit WoW so thin, no single game could do quite as well as it should have.
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
 

Tehlanna TPX

New member
Mar 23, 2010
284
0
0
MaVeN1337 said:
"You're skating uphill if you don't offer a free-to-play option," he added. "World of Warcraft has pretty much sucked the oxygen out of the subscription market and kind of devoured it itself."

If i had a goddamn nickel for every freaking time I said this since 2007 I would be. filthy fucking rich.

The most upsetting part of the whole thing, Is Blizzard stole all there ideas from Everquest, then completely missed the point of an MMO and made a far too easy game. WoW Is the instant gratification, juvenile, cartoony looking, joke version of everquest and it's predecessors.

Also it spawned like a million wow clones spreading the players who quit WoW so thin, no single game could do quite as well as it should have.

WOW IS TEH DEBIL....

wait really? Are you seriously of the opinion that WoW -stole- all of its ideas from Everquest? It snuck up in the dead of night and WHAMO hacked the creative thought process right the fuck out of it!

....Grow up. You'd have to be naiive to think that at this point in the MMO history that no one took from Everquest. Or Ultima Online. They were the great granddaddy's, the groundbreakers. Thats like saying that modern day literary greats stole from Shakespeare, or Twain.

Don't be so dramatic. I can understand if you dislike wow, but demonizing a damn videogame is downright childish.
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
traukanshaku said:
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
It's funny because that's exactly what everyone said about Everquest when it came out:

'Everquest is pretty much Ultima Online for Morons. Fortunately for Sony, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

Which is funny because before that, that's what everyone said about Ultima Online:

'Ultima Online is pretty much Neverwinter for Morons. Fortunately for Origin, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

It's nice to see the proud tradition of bashing whatever happens to be most popular at the time continues. Brings a tear to these nostalgic eyes! March on proud soldier, march on!
 

DancePuppets

New member
Nov 9, 2009
197
0
0
I play WoW, I quite like WoW. I don't really understand the hate it seems to get, it's not perfect but it is highly polished and the art style means that despite the lack of cutting edge graphics it still looks good. I assume that eventually i'll get bored of it, but I won't then turn round and say it's awful, I'll just stop playing as it will no longer interest me. Until then I'm quite happy to pay Blizzard £8 a month for the service they provide.
 

Red Albatross

New member
Jun 11, 2009
339
0
0
The Madman said:
traukanshaku said:
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
It's funny because that's exactly what everyone said about Everquest when it came out:

'Everquest is pretty much Ultima Online for Morons. Fortunately for Sony, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

Which is funny because before that, that's what everyone said about Ultima Online:

'Ultima Online is pretty much Neverwinter for Morons. Fortunately for Origin, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

It's nice to see the proud tradition of bashing whatever happens to be most popular at the time continues. Brings a tear to these nostalgic eyes! March on proud soldier, march on!
It might have been an argument had I not been a 4-year WoW player.

I don't hate the game. Far from it. But I do hate what it's doing to the market; namely, strangling it and stifling innovation. Regardless of personal feeling about any MMO, innovation and evolution are two of the most important parts of any industry. A company that gets successful enough to rest on its laurels always deserves to be taken down, in the end.
 

Fearzone

Boyz! Boyz! Boyz!
Dec 3, 2008
1,241
0
0
This is just a lame excuse for the balance issues and lack of content--especially end-game but all throughout the game too--for Champions Online.

They flushed any PvP longevity down the toilet with the bad balance--with good balance it was unique and could have been pretty fun--and then there's nothing to raid or anything of substance to do once you reach the level cap, and there no reason to reach level cap more than once, unless you want to repeat things over and over.

If there were budgetary issues I can understand some of the lack of content. But if they want people to stick around they have to put in end-game gear. There were even some end-game bosses, but they were buggy and had no drops. How much would it have cost to have them drop some purples? That is, good purples, not crappy ones you have to grind forever for, and then they are barely better than greens.

Bottom line, they don't understand PvP, and they don't even understand RPGs, surprisingly. Sure, they know about "role-playing" part of it, but they don't understand the "game."

I still recommend one play though of Champions Online, particularly if it is for free but even if it's not. And I'll still probably get their D&D game. The more D&D and the less Cryptic that goes into the gameplay design, the better.
 

JerrytheBullfrog

New member
Dec 30, 2009
232
0
0
traukanshaku said:
The Madman said:
traukanshaku said:
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
It's funny because that's exactly what everyone said about Everquest when it came out:

'Everquest is pretty much Ultima Online for Morons. Fortunately for Sony, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

Which is funny because before that, that's what everyone said about Ultima Online:

'Ultima Online is pretty much Neverwinter for Morons. Fortunately for Origin, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

It's nice to see the proud tradition of bashing whatever happens to be most popular at the time continues. Brings a tear to these nostalgic eyes! March on proud soldier, march on!
It might have been an argument had I not been a 4-year WoW player.

I don't hate the game. Far from it. But I do hate what it's doing to the market; namely, strangling it and stifling innovation. Regardless of personal feeling about any MMO, innovation and evolution are two of the most important parts of any industry. A company that gets successful enough to rest on its laurels always deserves to be taken down, in the end.
Yeah a company that rests on its laurels as the market leader deserves to fall.

But how is taking a huge risk and completely remaking your original game world almost from scratch while taking huge revamps to your gameplay Blizzard "resting on its laurels"?
 

Red Albatross

New member
Jun 11, 2009
339
0
0
JerrytheBullfrog said:
traukanshaku said:
The Madman said:
traukanshaku said:
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
It's funny because that's exactly what everyone said about Everquest when it came out:

'Everquest is pretty much Ultima Online for Morons. Fortunately for Sony, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

Which is funny because before that, that's what everyone said about Ultima Online:

'Ultima Online is pretty much Neverwinter for Morons. Fortunately for Origin, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market!'

It's nice to see the proud tradition of bashing whatever happens to be most popular at the time continues. Brings a tear to these nostalgic eyes! March on proud soldier, march on!
It might have been an argument had I not been a 4-year WoW player.

I don't hate the game. Far from it. But I do hate what it's doing to the market; namely, strangling it and stifling innovation. Regardless of personal feeling about any MMO, innovation and evolution are two of the most important parts of any industry. A company that gets successful enough to rest on its laurels always deserves to be taken down, in the end.
Yeah a company that rests on its laurels as the market leader deserves to fall.

But how is taking a huge risk and completely remaking your original game world almost from scratch while taking huge revamps to your gameplay Blizzard "resting on its laurels"?
I did mention in my original post that I was curious as to whether or not Cataclysm would be the spark that the game needs to stay fresh. I admit my point might have been buried under quite a bit of vitriol, but as a long-time player that was extremely unhappy with all the changes to make the game more "accessible," it's hard for me to look at Blizzard with anything other than distaste at the moment. But, if I'd never liked the game in the first place, I would care as much what happens to it now.

So, it remains to be seen whether or not changes in Cataclysm will be a renaissance or a disappointment. Given their track record of incessant pandering to the lowest common denominator of the playerbase, though, I'm not expecting much.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
traukanshaku said:
I don't hate the game. Far from it. But I do hate what it's doing to the market; namely, strangling it and stifling innovation. Regardless of personal feeling about any MMO, innovation and evolution are two of the most important parts of any industry. A company that gets successful enough to rest on its laurels always deserves to be taken down, in the end.
I'd argue the opposite is true. WoW is so damn good at what it does, that the only legitimate option for success is to try something completely different. If you just make a WoW clone, the way everyone has done for 5 years now, you are doomed to fail. Why play a WoW clone when you could be playing WoW? Unfortunately for the genre right now, publishers and developers are terrified of going out on a limb. Thus, you get the waves of imitators that inevitably fail.
 

boholikeu

New member
Aug 18, 2008
959
0
0
MaVeN1337 said:
"You're skating uphill if you don't offer a free-to-play option," he added. "World of Warcraft has pretty much sucked the oxygen out of the subscription market and kind of devoured it itself."

If i had a goddamn nickel for every freaking time I said this since 2007 I would be. filthy fucking rich.

The most upsetting part of the whole thing, Is Blizzard stole all there ideas from Everquest, then completely missed the point of an MMO and made a far too easy game. WoW Is the instant gratification, juvenile, cartoony looking, joke version of everquest and it's predecessors.

Also it spawned like a million wow clones spreading the players who quit WoW so thin, no single game could do quite as well as it should have.
traukanshaku said:
This, nail on the head, QFT, etc.

WoW is pretty much Everquest for Morons. Fortunately for Blizzard, and unfortunately for the rest of us, morons are a huge market, so Blizzard lit a rocket under their ass and took a trip straight to the financial ionosphere. Now, even the intelligent people that don't even like the game any more still feel like they have too much time invested to quit.

Nothing but WoW will kill WoW. It really looked like it was heading that way until the Cataclysm info came out - now, we'll have to see. I've still got my fingers crossed that the great, rotting behemoth will fall straight through the ground and into hell where it belongs, but I doubt it'll happen.
I always like when people complain that wow "ruined" MMOs by making them "easy enough for any moron".

Nevermind that most of the "dumbing down" was actually fixing broken things in the genre. Almost everything you'd name as ruining the genre would actually be considered a great design choice by the majority of developers.