Only because it will let them marry their guns.DVS BSTrD said:I bet Cyborg-marriage will be recognized in Texas before gay-marriage.
Only because it will let them marry their guns.DVS BSTrD said:I bet Cyborg-marriage will be recognized in Texas before gay-marriage.
Were it that easy.OniaPL said:Rather than developing this kind of technology, wouldn't it be more effective to dump that cash in something like gene therapy and gene research? Being able to use a vector to put a properly working, dominative allele in the place of one of the recessive alleles that cause achromatopsia (or being able to find the recessive gene and deal with it during the embryo/fetus phase) would be far better than just sticking a machine into someone's head and make them "hear" sounds.
That'd be a future where I'd like to live.
I agree with you in theory but that kind of research wouldn't help him now, realistically both need to be invested in. Sure we should research prevention of this kind of stuff but it's already affecting a lot of people so we just as much should help them overcome their difficulties rather than just saying "you're on your own, we'll fix it before the next batch of people".OniaPL said:Rather than developing this kind of technology, wouldn't it be more effective to dump that cash in something like gene therapy and gene research? Being able to use a vector to put a properly working, dominative allele in the place of one of the recessive alleles that cause achromatopsia (or being able to find the recessive gene and deal with it during the embryo/fetus phase) would be far better than just sticking a machine into someone's head and make them "hear" sounds.
That'd be a future where I'd like to live.
very true, if anything i'd ask if they could turn it into some kind of helmet/hat thing. I'd be too nervous that it'd catch on something (top of a door, something hanging) so i'd like some stability holding it on my head.snagli said:The little antenna looks silly, especially with his haircut, but this is beautiful. I for one would without a doubt enhance my senses and my body through cybernetics, but of course people with disabilities come first.
Due to a side-effect of profound grief and longing, I gained the sense of touch in my dreams, which I had never had before. Our dreams are a collection of our experiences and our thoughts. You don't dream about eyeborgs or smartphone displays or trees if you never saw one.JonB said:"One day I started hearing colors in my dreams.
If you're specifically using tech-modifies-neurons as a requirement for being a cyborg, someone beat you to it. Several someones, probably, but the first one I can think of is George Stratton [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptual_adaptation#Experimental_support] in the 1890s, who wore a pair of glasses that ultimately changed the way his brain processed images.JonB said:Then I understood what being a cyborg meant. It's not the union between the eyeborg and my head, what converts me into a cyborg, but the union between the software and my brain. My body and the technology have united.
What do you mean, in the future?Mojo said:Wow, pretty damn amazing.
Maybe in the future well be able to make blind people "see" with sounds, like bats do, or something...
I stand corrected.Redingold said:What do you mean, in the future?Mojo said:Wow, pretty damn amazing.
Maybe in the future well be able to make blind people "see" with sounds, like bats do, or something...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_echolocation
Look more closely, specifically at Kevin Warwick's section.Mojo said:I stand corrected.Redingold said:What do you mean, in the future?Mojo said:Wow, pretty damn amazing.
Maybe in the future well be able to make blind people "see" with sounds, like bats do, or something...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_echolocation
Beu they aren't using cyborg tech yet. Everything is better with cyborg tech.
Traitor...ron1n said:I for one welcome our new Cyborg Overlords.
That's why I said "dumping the cash into developing it"; I'm aware that getting a vector, for example the processed retrovirus to actually bring the gene to the right cell, put it in the right place and for the gene to successfully replace the "broken" part without even taking polygenes into consideration are all problems that would need to be solved. That's what I'd like to see; to get these kind of problems solved.Alleged_Alec said:Were it that easy.OniaPL said:Rather than developing this kind of technology, wouldn't it be more effective to dump that cash in something like gene therapy and gene research? Being able to use a vector to put a properly working, dominative allele in the place of one of the recessive alleles that cause achromatopsia (or being able to find the recessive gene and deal with it during the embryo/fetus phase) would be far better than just sticking a machine into someone's head and make them "hear" sounds.
That'd be a future where I'd like to live.
- Vectors: very tricky. We don't really have too much here yet. Retroviruses could work, but their random placement their genome onto a chromosome and the high number of cells in a human body makes it highly likely that you get some form of cancer.
- Not everything is dominant/recessive. Hell: for many genes we hardly know the functions, and almost all functions of a tissue depend on a huge genetic network. Also: if you don't spot the dysfunction in time, you're most likely fucked, since post-fetal growing of the right neural cells to the right parts of the brain is going to be a clusterfuck.
Also: the branch of molecular biology involved in what you're discussing and the branch of informatics/robotics which is used here are completely separate. Why not do both of them?
Well, I suppose so. But we could also instead just find the answer to the problem sooner to prevent more people with something like achromatopsia being born. Though that delves more into the area of moral dilemmas; whether to let people be born with it and just help them out, or whether to prevent it all together but leaving the pre-existing ones fucked.Frontastic said:I agree with you in theory but that kind of research wouldn't help him now, realistically both need to be invested in. Sure we should research prevention of this kind of stuff but it's already affecting a lot of people so we just as much should help them overcome their difficulties rather than just saying "you're on your own, we'll fix it before the next batch of people".OniaPL said:Rather than developing this kind of technology, wouldn't it be more effective to dump that cash in something like gene therapy and gene research? Being able to use a vector to put a properly working, dominative allele in the place of one of the recessive alleles that cause achromatopsia (or being able to find the recessive gene and deal with it during the embryo/fetus phase) would be far better than just sticking a machine into someone's head and make them "hear" sounds.
That'd be a future where I'd like to live.
Wouldn't that be masterbation?DVS BSTrD said:Cyborg marriage will take place the way GOD intended!rhizhim said:what about gay cyborg marriage?DVS BSTrD said:I bet Cyborg-marriage will be recognized in Texas before gay-marriage.
also:
DESTROY ALL MEATBAGS
http://images.highspeedbackbone.net/skuimages/large/CNET-YYC1-53408.jpg
I'm very disappointed in you, Mr. Jensen. You had a prime opportunity to say "At least he asked for this," and instead you make a Justin Beiber joke. For shame. And you call yourself a Deus Ex fan...I'd have half a mind to ask you to relinquish your profile pic. ;PAdam Jensen said:And what's the first thing he did with this amazing gift? He made a painting of Justin Bieber's song. How delightful.