I want to know why this guy needs special rights. It's not like he's being discriminated against because of what he has attached to his head is he? He's just a regular guy with some computer parts attached to him.
Except Cyborgs have been discriminated against. [http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/07/17/cyborg-discrimination-scientist-says-mcdonalds-staff-tried-to-pull-off-his-google-glass-like-eyepiece-then-threw-him-out/]romanator0 said:I want to know why this guy needs special rights. It's not like he's being discriminated against because of what he has attached to his head is he? He's just a regular guy with some computer parts attached to him.
Did you watch the video? He can't get into movie theatres because they think he's trying to record the movie with a camera and he got kicked out of supermarkets for some reason.romanator0 said:I want to know why this guy needs special rights. It's not like he's being discriminated against because of what he has attached to his head is he? He's just a regular guy with some computer parts attached to him.
She seems more like a cyborg than that guy, since her arm actually interfaces with her brain in both directions, while the Eyeborg seems to only be sending information to the guy's brain and not the other way around. I don't exactly get why he's the first to get recognized as a cyborg and what that recognition means.Smilomaniac said:Strange how this guy is a "legit" cyborg compared the guy with a camera in his eyesocket.
Or even better, a woman who is missing her left arm and has had her nerveendings grafted to her breast muscles.
The nerve endings still respond to her thinking that she's moving a finger, turning her wrist or lifting her arm as well as bending it.
This has allowed a team to create a shield that covers her breast and a computer mounted on her shoulder interprets it and moves the arm that's strapped to her.
This means that there is a woman who is controlling a cybernetic arm, with her thoughts.
http://www.ted.com/talks/todd_kuiken_a_prosthetic_arm_that_feels.html
The same team has through the same method, made a sensor that allows a person to feel through another prosthesis. They can feel if it's rough or silken or any other texture.
Compared to a sensor that translates colors into sounds, it seems a bit more useful and quite frankly, epic.
Then again, I don't know how it is, not to see color. But I could relate to losing an arm..!
If you watch the video, you'll hear that he gets barred from cinemas because they think he's filming, or kicked out of supermarkets because they think he's doing something illegal.romanator0 said:I want to know why this guy needs special rights. It's not like he's being discriminated against because of what he has attached to his head is he? He's just a regular guy with some computer parts attached to him.
You mean Civilization V isn't an accurate portrayal of how science works? WTH, I feel lied to :<immovablemover said:Its seems you don't quite understanding how Science, or funding, works.
1. You don't just throw money at science and miracles happen.
2. Science uses itself to improve itself - the research that went into this may very well help research in other areas relating to the same problems.
You're probably the kind of person that says things like "Why haven't they cured the common cold yet?" with a straight face.
He said in the video he's not allowed into cinemas and he gets kicked out of some shops. It's sort of understandable, what with that thing of his beeping away, but still.romanator0 said:I want to know why this guy needs special rights. It's not like he's being discriminated against because of what he has attached to his head is he? He's just a regular guy with some computer parts attached to him.
I understand his point about cyborg rights. While the woman with the cyborg arm is seen by others as just having an advanced prosthetic arm, people confuse that guy's device with a camera, which is harming his daily life. While not many people with this problem exist, which makes it a relatively minor problem now, it'll likely become a problem in the future.Smilomaniac said:I know, right?Doom972 said:She seems more like a cyborg than that guy, since her arm actually interfaces with her brain in both directions, while the Eyeborg seems to only be sending information to the guy's brain and not the other way around. I don't exactly get why he's the first to get recognized as a cyborg and what that recognition means.
It seems like they're branding themselves and making a fuss about it, unlike the team that was on TED, which is actually working to better human lives and not focusing on PR as much.
That, is gold! HahahahaCyrromatic said:He did not ask for this.
"lets become robots" "that sounds like a good idea"amiran123 said:Using technology to make up for handicaps? Sure!
Using technology to replace working bodyparts? Not so much...
This ^roman gnome said:This guy isn't a cyborg at all, and I'm pretty sure he knows that. He's just using that term because "fighting for cyborg rights" sounds better than "trying to convince people I should be allowed to wear my computerized camera-headphone gadget anywhere I want including places that expressly prohibit cameras because I can't see colors without it... or with it, but at least it makes beeping sounds to tell me what colors I'm not seeing."