OK, let's disagree with some people:
I've seen some people say that the stuff which makes the old movies good , somehow makes the new one bad (like the fridge scene is the WTF moment of the century, yet when Indy falls from a huuuuuge waterfall in a canoe and the get's out fine, people are like "it's the magic of the 80's"... bull shit)
What's with the hate for this movie? I saw all of them recently and all of them are of equal quality to me. The only difference is that the new one has CGI.Gizmo1990 said:Film: Indy 4 (Aliens in an indy movie? Stop screwing with us Lucas. And spialberg why did you not stop him?)
I've seen some people say that the stuff which makes the old movies good , somehow makes the new one bad (like the fridge scene is the WTF moment of the century, yet when Indy falls from a huuuuuge waterfall in a canoe and the get's out fine, people are like "it's the magic of the 80's"... bull shit)
For me, the 3rd one was the best one. Best acting, most versatile plot, best character development, most on-screen chemistry, having fun with the source material (in a good way, not in a "let's tear off its' legs and burn it with a magnifying glass" way)...Bambi On Toast said:Film: Spiderman 3. The first two were decent, but the 3rd was all over the place.
No, I don't.Wuggy said:Film: Matrix Reloaded - And you damn well know why.