Speaking as a Christian, a Christian alternative to Christmas (placed somewhere in the Spring, which is what the descriptions of the Nativity in the bible would suggest, instead of in the Winter, which only happened because the Roman feast of Saturnalia was held on December 25th, and the early Catholic church needed an easy way to change the meaning of that holiday, because there was no stopping people from celebrating it) would not be amiss. Easter could use one too; instead of being connected to Passover, which again is what is Biblically supported, it's connected to the Spring equinox -- same reason, this time for the festival of Eostre. Did you know that the Puritans were aware of this (or at least the part about Christmas; I've never heard anything about the Puritans and Easter), and it was originally illegal to celebrate Christmas in their colonies in the US?Reptiloid said:Hah, silly people. What's next? Are the christians gonna make a christian alternative to Christmas too?
Oh yeah, I went there.
Technically, I'm pretty sure Dr. King was an American Baptist; there's quite a few ways to be a baptist, too. Christianity has more denominations than any other religion I've ever heard of -- except maybe Hinduism, which if I understand it as well as I think I do, could feasibly have every individual Hindu having their own version of the faith, but if they accept some basic tenets, still qualify as Hindu.tirone231 said:Southern Baptist is a sect of Christianity...as is Catholicism....you can be Christian in many different ways:Kalezian said:tirone231 said:wow, generalization much? Man, sure glad that I'm not a Christian like Martin Luther King Jr, or Thomas Beckett, because they were just assholes, apparently. Hating a religion because of a rushed understanding of its history is also arrogant and selfishTselis said:The Christians took over every Pagan holiday they could in an effort to covert as many as they could before killing the rest. The majority of them are arrogant in their faith, ignorant of their faith's history, selfish, severely intolerant, and engage in idolatry. Given their history, does this honestly surprise you?
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was Baptist.....
and Thomas Becket was Catholic.
Don't ask me what the difference between a Catholic and a Christan is though, fuck all if I know.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations
Thank you for posting this. I really don't understand why so many (fundamentalist) Christians freak out about Halloween, calling it "the Devil's holiday" and so on. Have they never heard of All Hallow's Eve? It's no less Christian of a holiday than Christmas, which is itself celebrated at completely the wrong part of the year, and happens to coincide perfectly with the ancient Roman feast of Saturnalia. I vividly remember seeing a church proudly proclaiming that they were having a "harvest festival" instead of Halloween; I didn't have the heart to walk up and tell them that that was an infinitely more pagan celebration than the one it was replacing.KurtzGallahad said:Not quitePhoenix_XIII said:Halloween is a sacred holiday. Pagan New Year, my friends. And this bullshit is what makes me hate America.
Pagan refers to a belief system outside the major doctrines
Discordians are technically pagan, but All hallow's isn't their new year
(Just being pedantic)
Next up, I may only be a dabbling occultist, but I was under the impression that "Halloween" wasn't sacred to anyone, as it's a corruption of "Hallowe'en" which is from "All hallow's eve" (AkA All Saint's day) which is the christianisation of the first day of good old fashioned Samhain
Which isn't anything like new year, it's not a time for celebration, it's for contemplation and preparing your rites for the darker portion of the year
No-offense to your particular form of neo-wicca but if you're going to complain about America corrupting your belief system it would be nice to give a little more information about your belief system
I guess my point is
Yeah - I hate commercialised halloween too, but religion is constantly being corrupted; your beliefs are probably about as a far removed from the origin of wicca as halloween is from All Saint's, that's not an insult, simply a statement of fact, like comparing the new testament to the crusader's mindset, or the Crusaders to the modern catholics
Times change and culture changes with them, if you want to complain about Haloween disrepcting your beliefs then you should cut down on your excesses during lent and force all religions to reorganise their holidays so as to have no double bookings
If you want to get technical about it, it's Latin (or Greek or something; some language related to the Roman empire) for "Farmer." It picked up its modern meaning because farmers tended to be pretty far from the center of things, and it took a while for Christianity to get to Rome's hillbilly cousins, so they held on to the old beliefs longer than anyone else, and eventually said beliefs started to be referred to as "pagan beliefs," and the old gods as "the old Pagan gods."KeyMaster45 said:Pagan (as defined by Webster's dictionary):hiks89 said:pagn means more tan one god dont it???x-machina said:A pagan? I thought pagan was just a catch all term used to describe pretty much anybody who worships nature in anyway. I didn't think it was an specific set of beliefs. So uhh, can you tell me a little more about it?
- [li]1) heathen 1; especially : a follower of a polytheistic religion (as in ancient Rome)[/li][li]2) one who has little or no religion and who delights in sensual pleasures and material goods : an irreligious or hedonistic person.[/li]
A related term is Neo-pagan
Neo-pagan (as defined by Webster's dictionary):
- [li]a person who practices a contemporary form of paganism (as Wicca)[/li]
Link to Pagan definition [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pagan]
Link to Neo-pagan definition [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neo-pagan?show=0&t=1318309423]