Taken out of context because I was referring to an energy drink nothing more, yet you took a step too far.Haukur Isleifsson said:How can it be out of context when I quoted your entire post?
The thing is you seemed to display the attitude that it is not any one else's business what you do to your child. I might have been wrong to interpret you that way but surely you can see why it seems that way. The point is that the difference is in quantity not nature. If you are doing something that is detrimental to the health of your child than it IS "our" business.
You might not think it fair that other people, who surely know nothing of raising children having non of their own, want to control the way you raise your child. But you must see that the same principle that makes them interfere with your parenting allows us as a society to save children from negligent/abusive parents. So we must stay firm in our position that it is not your private matter what you do to your child.
I agree TO A DEGREE with what people are saying.
However, how I raise my kids is my business and nothing to do with anyone else. As long as i'm not hurting or abusing my children in any way shape or form then it has nothing to do with anyone.
She may have been in the wrong giving a child an energy drink but, as I said, we don't know any more details. If giving a child a drink like that is the worst thing she's done then while she's not in contention for mother of the year she certainly isn't the demon spawn people here are making her out to be.
If a child is in danger then, as a society, we should look to protect it. If the most danger that child faces is a caffiene rush then I think there are greater problems around we could be turning our attention to.