That's pretty much Bamco's strategy.Aby_Z said:I don't think 'exclusive' actually means anything anymore. The definition seems to be much more similar to "It's going to be only on this console... for about 3 months, then we'll release it on another" now.
Rather, multiple consoles shouldn't exist. Everything should be exclusive to one, universal console.Milky_Fresh said:They shouldn't exist. Fuck I'm sick of Microsoft buying out everything I want. Everything should be universal.
There's this thing called competition, keeps prices low.Milky_Fresh said:Why? I mean, I don't really see any negatives.LordNue said:That is a terrible idea.ohgodalex said:Rather, multiple consoles shouldn't exist. Everything should be exclusive to one, universal console.Milky_Fresh said:They shouldn't exist. Fuck I'm sick of Microsoft buying out everything I want. Everything should be universal.
Also, games would be even worse than they are now. Competition is what makes developers try.Pimppeter2 said:There's this thing called competition, keeps prices low.Milky_Fresh said:Why? I mean, I don't really see any negatives.LordNue said:That is a terrible idea.ohgodalex said:Rather, multiple consoles shouldn't exist. Everything should be exclusive to one, universal console.Milky_Fresh said:They shouldn't exist. Fuck I'm sick of Microsoft buying out everything I want. Everything should be universal.
If there was a gaming monopoly, they could charge whatever they want.