As a huge lover of anything with british space nazis with impractical glowing eyes (and kitty faces) I think Microsoft would need to pull some legally questionable stuff to get me on side.omega 616 said:The only shot MS has is the "1 billion in games" thing, if it can make a shed load of exclusives that make every gamer want to throw money at the xbone they might convince enough people to buy.
Failing that the xbone is doomed if it stays the course it has laid in.
Sep 12, 2003. It was called Steam. Please tell me you didn't install itMinionJoe said:Since when is treating a customer as a potential criminal considered "progress"?Nimzabaat said:Seriously, when did the PCGMR become the cranky old people shaking their fists at progress? Next thing we know the PCGMR will be flinging wooden shoes at Microsofts servers...
I find that to be delusional. The prices for new games are announced, it's going to be the same. The Reagan economic theory has been proven wrong. Do you really think that the companies will be willing to give up potential extra profit by keeping the prices the same, or even raise them since no one is dictating how much they can cost?Nimzabaat said:Xbox Live has convenience and sales as well. (There's a free game every week thing going that's been going on for the past little while). Cutting out the retailer and physical disks means they can sell triple-A titles for cheaper.
Games as a service never was and never will be a step forward. Just because you call it that doesn't make it true. Digital goods are extremely iffy and their treatment by basically every publisher has been horrendous at best.Nimzabaat said:So Microsoft wants to move people forward... and the PC Gaming Master Race are complaining? Since when did the PCGMR become Luddites?
You do realize Jarvis was created by a fictional character that is supposedly one of the smartest humans who ever lived. I highly doubt the Xbox One is going to function anywhere near as well as Jarvis does on even his worst days.Nimzabaat said:Having your own personal "Jarvis" should be a cool idea. Yet the PCGMR hates it.
After the recent NSA reveal and news that your phone can be used to spy on you as long as it has a battery charge (even if you have if "off") I'd say the less cameras and microphones in my house the better.Nimzabaat said:The Kinect can spy on you in your own home! You mean like your cell phone and webcam? Apparently that third thing in your home that can be used to spy on you is the straw that breaks the camels back.
Nobody likes Origin so that's a bad example.Nimzabaat said:Microsoft has DRM! Like Steam, Origin, and PS4? How dare they!
What Xbox does and its relation to Gamestop doesn't matter to anyone who places a PC primarily. Heck I haven't purchased a game from them in a decade and I do play console games. You can get better deals on Amazon new than you can used at Gamestop most times.Nimzabaat said:Microsoft may get cause Gamestop to go under! Like Blockbuster? (And, correct me if i'm wrong, isn't Gamestop the company that people hate because they only get $5 for a trading in a new game and Gamestop sells it for $5 off? Just saying, their days should be numbered. They deserve it).
It's an unnecessary restriction. That's the point. I'm certain you got that and are just trying to be obnoxious. Nobody with sense to login to a forum wouldn't get that. The account creation process would be too difficult for someone that simple.Nimzabaat said:You have to be connected to the interenet once every 24 hours! If you can post on an internet forum, that isn't a problem where you live.
Except nothing you said was valid and none of your reasoning was realistic.Nimzabaat said:Seriously, when did the PCGMR become the cranky old people shaking their fists at progress? Next thing we know the PCGMR will be flinging wooden shoes at Microsofts servers...
It took many years for people to accept Steam and that was only after Steam dramatically changed how they acted, the quality of their service, and the price of their products.Nimzabaat said:Sep 12, 2003. It was called Steam. Please tell me you didn't install it
Yes but not all of us bought a new xbox. When mine got the red ring, I had best buy fix it for free because I had kept the warranty(which I will admit with you, not many xbox gamers did). When they raised the price of Xbox Live, I protested by buying the next gears of war used. Sure, not the most effective way to protest, but at least I know they didn't get my money. Had this happened on a bigger level, microsoft really would be rethinking their policies.GonzoGamer said:What do you mean now? If that's what you call trashing (never move to NY 1st of all), I've been trashing 360 fans for years.Saucycarpdog said:Really? Your now trashing 360 fans? I have the Xbox 360 but I don't plan on ever buying the Xbox One with its current anti-consumer policies. Way to generalize a whole audience like they're a bunch of idiots.GonzoGamer said:Actually, this is around the time when you should be investing in MS stock. Well, to tell you the truth, I'd wait for it to drop a bit further.PoolCleaningRobot said:Anybody who invests in Microsoft at this point is asking to lose money. Microsoft clearly thinks they can strong arm people into going along with whatever they want.
Touch screens are the future! Let's force everyone to adopt touch interfaces!
Cloud connectivity is the future! Let's force everyone to stay connected!
They're a company that doesn't want to create things people want. Their future isn't looking good
You buy when its low.
And once again, I think gamers are the ones who made MS think they could strongarm people into going along with whatever. They sold enough 360s through the whole rrod ordeal then raised the price of online while cramming the service full of ads, everyone seemed okay with all that. It seems to me like the 360 fans stuck kick me signs to their own backs. In fact, I'm not all that convinced that the xbone Wont sell well. Even at this point. I'm sure they're going to lose some customers but probably customers that weren't making them that much money in the first place.
Why?
Because I saw all this shit coming from years away and now I have a Cassandra Complex...well, not really a complex, because you don't have to be a market analyst to figure it out. If a big corporation has a large group of consumers who will willingly buy a defective product, you can bet the board of directors will want to take full advantage of their brand loyalty.
And to be clear, I don't blame all 360 owners. But if you willingly bought a defective product, then bought another replacement when it broke (rather/in addition to getting it fixed for free), then you're setting a bad precedent. Same if you continued to pay for online while they raised the price and crammed it full of ads. By doing that, you set a bad precedent. Not really trashing anyone, just pointing out that capitalism has devolved into looterism since people seem to not have noticed that this has been slowly happening to every industry since the 80s.
Not quite. You can build a decent mid-range gaming PC for ~$700. If you're willing to go up to $12-1500, you can make a fucking amazing gaming PC.Nimzabaat said:It's about $1,000 to $3,000 dollars cheaper for one.
As a professional programmer in the mobile world, I can confidently state that there is no conceivable way for a mobile phone to turn itself on remotely, unless Apple has something really weird in the low-level iOS stuff. For Android, it's definitely completely impossible.Nimzabaat said:A half decent hacker/NSA agent can turn those on without you knowing about it. If someone wants to spy on you, they can.It is sad that people are used to everything about them being online somewhere, but webcams and mobiles can be turned off.
Yea, no. That's not how servers work. If the server goes down, the check-in doesn't happen. If the check-in doesn't happen, your console bricks itself. There's no way to magically pass the server check if the server has been overloaded or brought down for maintenance, or is suffering from a power outage, or any of a billion other things that could interfere with the connection that the customer has absolutely no power over.Nimzabaat said:They've already stated that if the problem is at their end it won't affect the check-in. Also if it's slow or intermitant doesn't affect a check-in that takes only a second or two.
There's a difference between "not seeing the positives" and "deciding the negatives vastly outweigh the positives".Nimzabaat said:You are only 500 dollars away from feeling like Tony Stark in your own living room, why not at least try to see the positives?
Hey. I'd love to believe it. I sincerely hope that with all this elaborate BS MS has set up, that the xbone bombs. And if it does I will apologize but I'm still convinced its going to do allright. Struggle to keep up with ps4, sure, but I don't think its going to be boycotted and I don't think anyone's going to learn a lesson from this. Once again, I hope I'm wrong (I would love to see things turn around) but I'm just going by past experience.Saucycarpdog said:Yes but not all of us bought a new xbox. When mine got the red ring, I had best buy fix it for free because I had kept the warranty(which I will admit with you, not many xbox gamers did). When they raised the price of Xbox Live, I protested by buying the next gears of war used. Sure, not the most effective way to protest, but at least I know they didn't get my money. Had this happened on a bigger level, microsoft really would be rethinking their policies.GonzoGamer said:What do you mean now? If that's what you call trashing (never move to NY 1st of all), I've been trashing 360 fans for years.Saucycarpdog said:Really? Your now trashing 360 fans? I have the Xbox 360 but I don't plan on ever buying the Xbox One with its current anti-consumer policies. Way to generalize a whole audience like they're a bunch of idiots.GonzoGamer said:Actually, this is around the time when you should be investing in MS stock. Well, to tell you the truth, I'd wait for it to drop a bit further.PoolCleaningRobot said:Anybody who invests in Microsoft at this point is asking to lose money. Microsoft clearly thinks they can strong arm people into going along with whatever they want.
Touch screens are the future! Let's force everyone to adopt touch interfaces!
Cloud connectivity is the future! Let's force everyone to stay connected!
They're a company that doesn't want to create things people want. Their future isn't looking good
You buy when its low.
And once again, I think gamers are the ones who made MS think they could strongarm people into going along with whatever. They sold enough 360s through the whole rrod ordeal then raised the price of online while cramming the service full of ads, everyone seemed okay with all that. It seems to me like the 360 fans stuck kick me signs to their own backs. In fact, I'm not all that convinced that the xbone Wont sell well. Even at this point. I'm sure they're going to lose some customers but probably customers that weren't making them that much money in the first place.
Why?
Because I saw all this shit coming from years away and now I have a Cassandra Complex...well, not really a complex, because you don't have to be a market analyst to figure it out. If a big corporation has a large group of consumers who will willingly buy a defective product, you can bet the board of directors will want to take full advantage of their brand loyalty.
And to be clear, I don't blame all 360 owners. But if you willingly bought a defective product, then bought another replacement when it broke (rather/in addition to getting it fixed for free), then you're setting a bad precedent. Same if you continued to pay for online while they raised the price and crammed it full of ads. By doing that, you set a bad precedent. Not really trashing anyone, just pointing out that capitalism has devolved into looterism since people seem to not have noticed that this has been slowly happening to every industry since the 80s.
I know microsoft is very full of themselves right now and so is issuing their tyranical policies, but not all of us gamers are as stupid as you think. I know most of my friends are checking out pc gaming instead of getting the Xbox One this year, though we still love to get on the 360 every now and then to play some halo 3.
It's worked for movies and music, why do gamers have to be so backwards?theultimateend said:Games as a service never was and never will be a step forward. Just because you call it that doesn't make it true. Digital goods are extremely iffy and their treatment by basically every publisher has been horrendous at best.
That was an example. You can call it GlaDos, Hal, Jarvis, Mother, whatever, the technology is still ahead of anything Sony and Nintendo are doing. If you don't want to use it, you don't have to.You do realize Jarvis was created by a fictional character that is supposedly one of the smartest humans who ever lived. I highly doubt the Xbox One is going to function anywhere near as well as Jarvis does on even his worst days.
I've had voice commands on my PC before, I turned them off. It's a cute idea but just not for me. Microsoft has already stated on twitter that it is probably possible for people to shut off your game if you are playing with them over voice chat and not using a headset.
It's your choice to be afraid of the people who are trying to keep you from harm as opposed to the people who want to do you harm. If you want to wear a tinfoil hat, that's your business I guess.After the recent NSA reveal and news that your phone can be used to spy on you as long as it has a battery charge (even if you have if "off") I'd say the less cameras and microphones in my house the better.
I dunno about straws and camels but I have heard stories about snowballs.
Granted. Steam 2.0 didn't go over so well.Nobody likes Origin so that's a bad example.
It happens all the time on Xbox Live. I'm not going to stop believing my eyes on your say so.The PS4 has the same DRM as the PS3 and 360 Afaik which barely have anything worse than every console ever.
Steam lets me buy games up to 80% off. This will never happen on the Xbox One, if it becomes common I will happily purchase one and just put paper over the Kinect.
You do realize the check-in is a background thing that you won't even notice right? There has to be some restriction to prevent over-sharing. PS4 requires you to have the disk, while XB1 allows 10 people on your "family" list to play anything in your games library from their console. There has to be some sort form of checks and balances for that not to be abused.It's an unnecessary restriction. That's the point. I'm certain you got that and are just trying to be obnoxious. Nobody with sense to login to a forum wouldn't get that. The account creation process would be too difficult for someone that simple.Nimzabaat said:You have to be connected to the interenet once every 24 hours! If you can post on an internet forum, that isn't a problem where you live.
Everything I said was valid, released to the press, and freely available. You just have to open your eyes.Except nothing you said was valid and none of your reasoning was realistic.
The NSA thing has nothing to do with the XB1 and that "scandal" is merely ignorant people being naive about the world they live in. If potential terrorists would just identify themselves as such, things would be simpler, but that isn't the case.People are upset because its unnecessary restrictions that provide no benefit to the consumer and it adds an extra layer of intrusion on the heels of the largest privacy scandal in American history.
Poorly timed, poorly marketed, and poorly planned.
True, for twice the money you can get a better gaming experience without all the bonus features. But some people don't want to spend that much and fiddle with things when they can get it in one box for half the cash. Weird huh?It provides nothing that a PC can't already give you. Even the controller will (likely) work on PC.
That can be honestly said about any console. Well unless you notice the fact that the PS4 and WiiU don't have controller-less motion controls and voice control.You get literally nothing from the new console except old technology that you inexplicably call innovative.
Look at what you are posting. Every point you bring up is laced with an insult, and every point everyone else brings up is repelled by an exaggeration, generalization, or dismissal.Nimzabaat said:Snip.
I'm not saying it's going to be THAT awesome. I'm just saying that someone clever enough can make the most of it if they dare to see its potential.Wolfe M. Howler said:Look at what you are posting. Every point you bring up is laced with an insult, and every point everyone else brings up is repelled by an exaggeration, generalization, or dismissal.Nimzabaat said:Snip.
You're fighting tooth and nail for this console for the fantasy of having a robotic butler, when the only precedent being the original Kinect, which, in my opinion, was a useless mess.
Fair enough.I know that I'm not going to change your mind, and you're sure as hell not changing mine, so I guess I call this a standstill.
I'm sorry about that, for your sake. I just miss the days when the PCGMR was, well... smart. Now it's just die-hards and casuals who are open to progress and the PCGMR is sitting there going "you kids with your jets, we've got propellers and they worked just fine! Don't go faster than sound! You'll EXPLODE!!!!" (people seriously believed that once) I guess i'm just getting old and missing the good old daysIf you think this is the future, and you are willing to accept it's flaws, then go ahead and buy it.
This is not a future I want, however, and I am quite willing to "live in the past" until a better future comes up.
Yeah. In some cases he doesn't even reply with something relevant (I mention DRM and he goes off about Xbox Live and believing his eyes).Wolfe M. Howler said:Look at what you are posting. Every point you bring up is laced with an insult, and every point everyone else brings up is repelled by an exaggeration, generalization, or dismissal.
Nimzabaat said:Microsoft has DRM! Like Steam, Origin, and PS4? How dare they!
don't quote me on this, but i'm pretty sure Steam only require you to be online once every 30 days to verify your account, plenty of room in there for internet downage.Gearhead mk2 said:Steam has DRM, but it makes up for it with convinence and sales. The PS4 won't play disks that aren't authentic and greedy publishers may block used versions of their games. Those are far better then a daily checkup for all games and constantly seeing how many people are in the room. As for Origin, that's even worse then the Kinect.
yeah its a shame, but people will lap up this anti consumer product due to lack of knowledge or loyalty. the only real sales lost will be those who follow gaming news and dont feel a loyalty to a certain brandmeowchef said:Everyone is overreacting to this to a startling degree. The Xbox One is going to sell perfectly fine... just as the PS4 will. It's going to be exactly like this generation, and anyone who disagrees really is kidding themselves.