Xbox One No Longer Requires Kinect to Function

Recommended Videos
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
I'm relatively certain I'm going to be the only one thinking this but here it goes...

I like this. HOWEVER, shipping out a Kinect-free version would be a terrible mistake.

At this point, Microsoft has a lot of eggs in the Kinect basket. They need to either embrace the stupid thing fully or they need to cut the loss and abandon it.
I completely agree. Unless a kinect is guaranteed to be in every living room that has an xbox, it will be relegated to accessory and not the integral feature it was meant to be. As an integral feature, developers will utilise it, as an accessory it will only attract niche titles.

But then in the age we're in of cross platform development being the norm, and the PS4 lacking an equivalent, it may well get little love anyway.
 

Amaury_games

New member
Oct 13, 2010
196
0
0
What I take from this is that Microsoft's business strategy was/is: Advertise a crappy console with unnecessary restrictions that will take more money from your public than it should and will probably enrage them. If there's a backlash, then proceed to remove the unnecessary functions one by one until the public believes Microsoft actually listened to them and made these changes to make them happy.
Either that or this funny situation: Microsoft's idea of the next gen console is extremely obnoxious. Sony then, proceed to make the point that they aren't like Microsoft. And now, Microsoft is starting to make the point that they're like Sony. Oh, the hilarity! XD
 

KarmaTheAlligator

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,472
0
0
w9496 said:
KarmaTheAlligator said:
w9496 said:
Yay?

I never understood the gripe about the Kinect(other than the spying stuff. I do understand that). Do people fear standing up when they play games?

10 bucks says that 90% of games with Kinect are just going to use it for voice commands mid-combat. I don't think you'll be forced to dodge incoming attacks with tactical rolls or anything.
It's not a matter of fear, it's a matter of wanting to relax when playing games, as opposed to acting like a monkey to get the console to register your movements, and even then it's usually sketchy.
I suppose I can understand that, but from what I understand many games with Kinect just use it as a voice recognizer like Mass Effect 3 did with squadmate powers and things of that nature.

People are always saying that Kinect-only games hardly work, but I've played one of the Dance Central games at a friends house and it worked fine.
But if it's only for the voice, a built in mic would do just fine, there's no need for a motion/everything sensor. And even then, voice recognition is hardly an exact science. It just makes no sense.
 

TwoSidesOneCoin

New member
Dec 11, 2010
194
0
0
dreadedcandiru99 said:
TwoSidesOneCoin said:
http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-wont-actually-need-kinect-plugged-in-microso-1113142909

Sorry, no Kinect free bundle for anyone.
Until there is one, I'm not getting it. As long as the Kinect comes in the box, there's the possibility that they'll eventually put out a mandatory software update to make you use it again. I wouldn't trust them not to try that.
That right there is the reason I don't trust them. What is to prevent them from changing their hardware to work just as they originally planned? They were adamant that it would be hard to change and then next thing you know they changed almost everything. So what's to stop them from changing it back to how it was?

Customer backlash? "We already have your money, we don't care if you don't want the system to work like this."

Let's hope they don't do it, but judging from how they handled this whole issue, it seems that long term thinking isn't their strong suit.
 

Diablo1099_v1legacy

Doom needs Yoghurt, Badly
Dec 12, 2009
9,732
0
0
Wow...Crazy how all our ranting is actually being listened to.
At this rate, the Xbone might have a chance sales wise, but the PR damage has already been done.
 

Flames66

New member
Aug 22, 2009
2,310
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
I'm relatively certain I'm going to be the only one thinking this but here it goes...

I like this. HOWEVER, shipping out a Kinect-free version would be a terrible mistake.

At this point, Microsoft has a lot of eggs in the Kinect basket. They need to either embrace the stupid thing fully or they need to cut the loss and abandon it. If they release a version of the system without the Kinect, they're going to end up with the original Kinect's problem; No one designing anything for it because it's an optional piece of equipment that no one bought.

Personally, I'd prefer them to just abandon it but I doubt that's going to happen.
You're probably right there. I personally would prefer it if the kinect gets ignored by most developers as I don't trust m$ with an always on camera/mic that can detect someones position, bodily functions and emotional state and would refuse to talk around one. Also it would make porting things to other consoles and PCs much simpler.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,897
0
0
SeventhSigil said:
loc978 said:
This almost got interesting. Inferior hardware for the same price would make for a much closer race than inferior hardware for more money. Maybe Microsoft is just biding their time with all of these Xbone about-faces. Perhaps each was planned as a fallback point from the beginning...

Or maybe they've planned to make a package that drops the Kinect and $150 off the price, that might actually make it competitive.

As someone who is essentially sitting this generation out, I'm interested to see if one side screwing up and slowly correcting themselves garners more praise than the other side having a reasonable(ish) plan from the beginning and sticking to it.
To be honest, and I'm speaking as someone who is pretty pleased with the change, if only for peace of mind, the string of policy changes seem less some preplanned series of fallback points, And more a gradual toeing of the line. Rather than simply make all of the changes at once, they're seeing how many changes it would actually take to get sales up to whatever projections they have or, possibly, to reach a parity with the PS4. When the DRM and used game reversal were made, There was a responding surge in preorders, but the Xbox One looked to be behind the PS4. So they loosened indie restrictions by allowing self-publishing, which, at least on Amazon, made absolutely no difference. When that wasn't enough, they included a headset, same lack of difference. When that wasn't enough, they made the Kinect no longer quite as critical to the system's operation.

I base this mostly off the fact that the loosening of indie policies, and the inclusion of a headset both have likely cost Microsoft a fair bit of income and control. With self-publishing, presumably they cannot seek terms of timed exclusivity on indie games like they could with the Xbox 360's indie publishing policies, Meaning that any indie exclusives are likely ones they would have to fund outright, or purchase, instead of making it a requirement to publish through Microsoft Studios. Combine that with the fact that they previously released statements insisting they would not be changing their minds on either policy, and the suggestion is that something has motivated them to do it after all.

What really leaves me curious is what might happen if this newest announcement doesn't tip the numbers in their favor either. Will they give up and just let things rest as they are? Or are more changes on the horizon?
Perhaps this is just me being incredibly cynical about advertising and corporate PR in general... and Microsoft's PR specifically... but I tend to assume such statements of intent are simply lies (in fact, I'll be amazed if Sony's PS4 used game policy is as simple in practice as it is in their advertising). There's very little to be gained by honesty in advertising these days, and very little to be lost through a lack thereof.

Mind you, I do agree that they absolutely intended to get away with all of their schemes to begin with... if possible. Turns out that a large portion of their customer base is smart enough not to fall for that (insert meme about faith in humanity featuring Freddy Mercury here).
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
This just goes to show how much confidence they had on their own product: not much.
They had confidence in it, just none of the gamers did. An its not like MS actually sold the Kinect2 to the gamers to make us want it. Oh well, it wont be missed.
 

tardcore

New member
Jan 15, 2011
103
0
0
Well well, this just gets better and better. So this means that every thing they said was set in stone and unchangeable about the Xbone was utter utter bullshit. Props to them actually listening (well caving under) the criticism, but considering this whole fiasco I think Microsoft could benefit from culling some of the higher up morons that helped to cause it.
 

Roxas1359

Burn, Burn it All!
Aug 8, 2009
33,758
1
0
And thus nothing of value was lost.
Honestly these 180s are actually really starting to show how out of touch Microsoft is with the rest of its consumer base. I mean they spent millions on PR hyping this thing up, defending all of their bad decisions, and then one by one they start doing a 180 on all their decisions.

Really at this point it's not the Xbox One, it's basically the Xbox 720 now since they've reversed so many decisions. Hell if they keep it up this way I may eventually just pick one up years down the road. In the mean time I'll be playing my PS3, Wii U, 360, and eventually a PS4 to tide me over. :3

Edit: Oh, and while I know Mattrick isn't there anymore I feel the need to post this picture. XD

 

VG_Addict

New member
Jul 16, 2013
651
0
0
How anyone can trust Microsoft anymore is beyond me. First, it was the Windows 8 fiasco. Then, it was the XBOX One DRM. Then, we learn that they've been helping the NSA.

And this changes nothing. It's still expensive despite being less powerful, you can't do shit without a Gold membership, and most of the good games for it at launch are multiplat.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
This means little if they are still going to bundle it in with the console rather than give people a choice to not buy it. I wonder if it will affect the price much too, people have said it is the sole reason the Xbone is $100 more than the PS4 and if they do actually drop the Kinect they might stand a chance.
 

Tenkage

New member
May 28, 2010
1,528
0
0
ok, if they make it so I don't need cloud save and they release a kinectless version of the console, then I might consider buying it
 

HellbirdIV

New member
May 21, 2009
608
0
0
Just removing the things that make people reject the Xbone isn't enough, not for me anyway.

Considering all the money they must have poured into it by now I'm surprised there hasn't been a single thing about the Xbone that made me consider purchasing it, and that's before you get to the shady proposals, blatant lies in PR and pathetic attempts to squeeze whatever extra money out of the consumer that they can.
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,771
0
0
OlasDAlmighty said:
Now probably isn't the best time to place faith in Microsoft to "do what's right". They're only removing this stuff now due to enourmous backlash from the public, and it's obvious they aren't happy about it.

Not saying it's gonna happen or it ain't, just that it seems wrong to dismiss the possibility completely. If I did plan on buyin one, I'd at least wait a little while first to see how everything pans out. There's no harm in waiting.
I haven't put faith into them. I just know by absolute human reason they seriously would not do something completely inhumanly stupid like that. The enforcement of requiring Kinect to use a console after the user has purchased it when for some period of time it didn't require it would be fucking suicidal. On top of that, they would be intentionally bricking everyone's console if they did not have access to a kinect until those users went out and bought themselves a kinect. In other words, it would be a forced 75-100$ update that holds their console hostage and renders it useless until the user purchases what is required. No business in history would even consider or has pulled a move like that. Even if they were run by the fucking Cobra Commander they wouldn't do it, they'd lose money faster than water flows down Niagra Falls.

Them Backtracking hasn't ruined my support for them permanently but I am glaringly aiming every weapon I have at them while they remove their bullshit policies bit by bit. I loved my 360 more than anythin' and currently I am seeing more and more reason to buy an Xbox One, but I won't forget their retarded decision to cut their own leg off on May 21st. The only thing I need is 399$ for a console or less and I'll buy one.
 

soren7550

Overly Proud New Yorker
Dec 18, 2008
5,477
0
0
w9496 said:
Yay?

I never understood the gripe about the Kinect(other than the spying stuff. I do understand that). Do people fear standing up when they play games?
Other than the spying stuff, people's gripes on the Kinect typically are:

- They don't have enough space for it to work (from what I remember, you need ten feet of space between you and the Kinect, and for a lot of people, they'd have to redo their entire rooms just to get the stupid thing to work, and for some it's just downright impossible for them to do thanks to small living quarters).
- It kills immersion. Yahtzee said it best (can't remember which review he said it in) when he pointed out that immersive gaming isn't going to happen with motion controls since you're always aware that you're playing a game since you're moving like a spaz, and often the motion controls don't represent what you're doing in the game and/or don't properly work.
- Longer play sessions will be exhausting (that's if the game implements motion controls), and baring that, yelling at your TV is goofy. Which reminds me...
- Kinect often stops what you're doing because it hears the audio from what you're playing/watching and interprets it as a command to stop.

OT: Well, the XBone just became a more attractive product.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Final7111 said:
In addition to reversing its used game DRM policies for Xbox One, Microsoft has revealed that the console will no longer require Kinect to function. In our latest Ask Microsoft Anything, Xbox Corporate Vice President Marc Whitten revealed that Xbox One owners will be able to use all of the console's core functions regardless of whether the new Kinect sensor is connected. Naturally, many of the tentpole features of the new Kinect, such as player identification, voice commands, etc., will be disabled as a result, but players will still be able to play games and access entertainment content.
Its kinda funny watching Microsoft reverse all their Xbone policies. I'm willing to bet that now there will be a kinect free version to bring the console down to $400!

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/08/12/xbox-one-no-longer-requires-kinect-to-function
That will probably be far after launch. I doubt they want to see mass cancellations due to a kinect free cheaper version.

EDIT: Also, they'll want the initial install base of the kinect as high as possible.
 

Frezzato

New member
Oct 17, 2012
2,448
0
0
God damn, four months from street date and Microsoft is still mucking about with major system changes. My view of Microsoft has now shifted from distrust to pity.
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
PatrickXD said:
Now literally the only swaying point for me to get the Xbone is gone, mandatory Kinect functionality meant that game developers could potentially be free to design games using the Kinect, safe in the knowledge that they would be reaching out to a massive audience. Ah well. Guess I'll stick just to PC gaming then.
All Xbox will have a Kinect, it not like they are dropping them from the system. So it still safe in that regard. The day they drop the Kinect from the system will be the day I quit the game industry.
 

Ragsnstitches

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,871
0
0
So... what? Microsoft are the good guys now? They started the show off waving that area between the balls and the anus in our faces. That was met poorly and they tried to reason with us to see why they were showing their lude bits to us and tell us that it was purely for our benefit. We called bull and soon they proceeded to apologise and slowly put their pants back on (excruciatingly slowly... hoping the obscenity would grow on us). Then finally offered nothing to distinguish itself from its competitors other then a total lack of self-awareness.

One of my biggest complaints about the PS4 was that it really didn't do anything. Aside from the improved hardware and developer friendly architecture the PS4 is just the PS3 again but aping facebooks "social networking". They literally did nothing and won the hearts of many. It was utterly safe, which is okay (better then innovation without motivation) but they hardly justified a whole new generation that actively segregates the prior generations.

What is Xbone doing? Exactly the same thing now, but with the odorous smell of gooch spoiling everyones good times.

This isn't a crack at their lack of integrity... I wanted them to change. But for fuck sake, we're nearly half a year after they shat the bed (the reveal) and they are still, begrudgingly (and have on numerous occasions tried to guilt US over it), cleaning the bed sheets.

How can anyone be so quick to run back to them. Like battered spouses.

Captch: Charlie Bit Me

Well maybe you shouldn't have put your finer in his mouth... wow, that analogy might have been better for the preceding comment.