I'm pretty sure that this trend started due to UK versions having to be different for some games, since you can't sell videogames that show children dying in them. That's why, for example, Fallout 1 & 2 didn't have children on the UK versions, although a fan patch can fix that.ThriKreen said:You'd notice a lot of professional made games tend to either not have them or make children immortal...
Saying games need to be fun is the equivalent of saying books need to be informative, or that films need to be action-packed.aguspal said:Damn man, look how far we have gotten, now games dont need to be fun...
Sigh- In those kind of times I actually miss the older gaming.
I think saying that the shooter is always "100% to blame" is a rather sweeping statement to make.Katatori-kun said:Whenever anyone escalates a conflict, they are entirely at fault for the escalation. When you respond to bullying with mass murder, you are 100% to blame.blazearmoru said:To make things worse, I highly doubt that the shootings were entirely the fault of the shooter and those at fault such as bullies and stuff are probably either dead, or definitely not going to own up to their responsibility and tell the truth... this makes a legit story very difficult.
If you kill innocent kids then you're 100% to blame. No excuses. No rationalization. Fuck me, if you kill kids, you stop being human.Pandalink said:I think saying that the shooter is always "100% to blame" is a rather sweeping statement to make.Katatori-kun said:Whenever anyone escalates a conflict, they are entirely at fault for the escalation. When you respond to bullying with mass murder, you are 100% to blame.blazearmoru said:To make things worse, I highly doubt that the shootings were entirely the fault of the shooter and those at fault such as bullies and stuff are probably either dead, or definitely not going to own up to their responsibility and tell the truth... this makes a legit story very difficult.
I suppose it comes down to what you define as being deserved of "blame". There are multiple reasons behind the actions of a school shooter, and whether you choose to place blame there or not is, in my view, down to individual opinion.Katatori-kun said:He had a choice to pull the trigger or not pull the trigger. Barring clinically diagnosed insanity indicating he was not in control of his actions, there's no way around that. I will not accept any attempt to blame his bullies as having any ethical validity. Yes, bullying is absolutely wrong, and schools need to take much stronger steps to stop it. But the moment you choose to retaliate with murder, you are 100% responsible for your choices. Period.Pandalink said:I think saying that the shooter is always "100% to blame" is a rather sweeping statement to make.Katatori-kun said:Whenever anyone escalates a conflict, they are entirely at fault for the escalation. When you respond to bullying with mass murder, you are 100% to blame.blazearmoru said:To make things worse, I highly doubt that the shootings were entirely the fault of the shooter and those at fault such as bullies and stuff are probably either dead, or definitely not going to own up to their responsibility and tell the truth... this makes a legit story very difficult.
Damn, you read my mind there. You could also add an L.A. Noire style investigation sequence after, trying to find motive or more about the killer, interview the heartbroken parents etc. It could actually be quite powerful if handled well.ThriKreen said:Anyway, boring answer, I'd do it from the perspective of the responders. Be a short but intense game playing first as the responding officer, then EMT's, then the SRT team going in to take down the shooters dead or alive.
I wouldn't even consider doing a game as the shooters.
which would be excellently combined with a minimalistic UI, so the mechanics of fighting doesn't detract from the effect of what you are seeing and doing.Dreiko said:I'd make it a survival horror game where the person is seeing monsters and stuff and he's not comprehending he's in a school but in some abandoned hotel or something, then by the very very very end, I'd reveal the protagonist was actually shooting children.
That's bound to mind**** a few folks.
Fair enough, if that's your view.Katatori-kun said:I cannot conceive of a valid ethical system where a person who does not murder is deemed to be in any way to blame for themselves being murdered. It simply doesn't work. This is just victim-blaming, akin to saying that rape victims shouldn't have dressed provocatively. Now yes, the bullies at Columbine shouldn't have bullied and authorities at the school should have put a stop to it, but at the end of the day they didn't decide to murder 12 people who may not have even been involved in the bullying. Two boys made that choice, and they are 100% responsible for it.Pandalink said:I suppose it comes down to what you define as being deserved of "blame". There are multiple reasons behind the actions of a school shooter, and whether you choose to place blame there or not is, in my view, down to individual opinion.Katatori-kun said:He had a choice to pull the trigger or not pull the trigger. Barring clinically diagnosed insanity indicating he was not in control of his actions, there's no way around that. I will not accept any attempt to blame his bullies as having any ethical validity. Yes, bullying is absolutely wrong, and schools need to take much stronger steps to stop it. But the moment you choose to retaliate with murder, you are 100% responsible for your choices. Period.Pandalink said:I think saying that the shooter is always "100% to blame" is a rather sweeping statement to make.Katatori-kun said:Whenever anyone escalates a conflict, they are entirely at fault for the escalation. When you respond to bullying with mass murder, you are 100% to blame.blazearmoru said:To make things worse, I highly doubt that the shootings were entirely the fault of the shooter and those at fault such as bullies and stuff are probably either dead, or definitely not going to own up to their responsibility and tell the truth... this makes a legit story very difficult.