You Can Get Freaky With Your Fable III Co-Op Partner

FightThePower

The Voice of Treason
Dec 17, 2008
1,716
0
0
Feriluce said:
FightThePower said:
This is the stupidest fucking idea ever.

Two mates playing co-op and then virtually fucking each other would be awkward if they didn't fancy each other, and if they did, they why wouldn't they just fuck each other IRL?
Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. It'll be using natal remember?
Haha, good call. Didn't think of that.
 

AmayaOnnaOtaku

The Babe with the Power
Mar 11, 2010
990
0
0
13lackfriday said:
This one sees virtual baby mama drama.
QUICK! Someone call Maury Povich!

Aylaine said:
I wonder if you will still get STD's. At least you can pin the blame card now!
In fable 2 you could and if you played it online and click on another character's info, you could see how many times they paid for sex, and how many STDs they had.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
I can see it now.

"In the case of 2 year old Ezekiel the Wanderer, Azeriel the Bold, you are not the father!"

Wait, if you can get freaky eeky in the game, does that mean when you and your partner divorce you have to pay child support?
 

The Ambrosian

Paperboy
May 9, 2009
487
0
0
You do realise this game uses Kinect aswell as a controller. Hehe.

Some funny motion-sensing related images are in my head right now.
 

AmayaOnnaOtaku

The Babe with the Power
Mar 11, 2010
990
0
0
Aylaine said:
AmayaOnnaOtaku said:
13lackfriday said:
This one sees virtual baby mama drama.
QUICK! Someone call Maury Povich!

Aylaine said:
I wonder if you will still get STD's. At least you can pin the blame card now!
In fable 2 you could and if you played it online and click on another character's info, you could see how many times they paid for sex, and how many STDs they had.
I remember that part even if it seemed really pointless. Hopefully they add some more...meaningful repercussions for it now?[/quotE}
Hopefully, wonder if it will be a debuff that is temporary or until you get treated at a clinic
 

DayDark

New member
Oct 31, 2007
657
0
0
I'm seeing it now, People complaining about their character having just been raped, and wanting an abort.
 

Centrophy

New member
Dec 24, 2009
209
0
0
Ursus Astrorum said:
Well, that's certainly an interesting turn of events. Bravo for the risk, though if you have a significant other that's willing to do this I don't see why you wouldn't be doing the real-life alternative instead. Battle couples are kinda cool, though. *shrug*

Also, I don't see why everyone's getting weirded out by this. You can knock up your friend's character. Doesn't mean you have to, or that it'll come up if you don't want it to. It's just an odd little quirk, an addition that only means something if you intend to use it. As long as you can still slay baddies without having to shag your counterpart every five minutes, there really isn't anything to worry about. So can we move on from the shock of OH MY GOD THIS GAME HAS SEX WITH OTHER PEOPLE WITH IT and move on to the more meaningful tidbits like story and actual gameplay?
Yeah, but I'd bet good money that if this makes it to the final cut that there will be an achievement for it.
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
Haakong said:
FieryTrainwreck said:
See that quoted part above? Where you say this feature is for kids that found the best part of GTA3 to be the "car shaking" with a hooker? Yeah, that was you calling my gal and me kids. Point being: you shouldn't make judgmental comments and expect none in return.

Anyways, mine was tongue-in-cheek. If I'm trying to insult a person, I'm not going to use the word "stuffy". Relax, guy!
since you replied with some sort of logic, i guess you arent a troll. that narrows it down :D

see what a wrote there? thats an insult, the thing that you wrote to me. what i wrote earlier was an opinion. i didnt call anyone spesific kids or immature, i said

"this feature is clearly for the kids that found the best part of GTA3 to be the "car shaking" with a hooker"

meaning i believe its NOT targeting couples, but immature people. i didnt call you or your girl immature by that sentence, nor did i call anyone that buy the game immature. it wasnt a build up from opinion, it was an independent opinion thats something different than you believe. learn the difference kiddo (another insult, see the difference now?)

and where do you get the idea im not relaxed? you just confused me with your personal assault on me, you didnt provoke me in any way. i even said your insults could be looked upon as compliments :D
You'd have a leg to stand on if you hadn't quoted me when offering your opinion, which points me directly to your post and pretty obviously paints me as the target. If not, consider everything I've said to be directed at no one in particular, and my quoting your posts to be entirely unrelated. In fact, I didn't even insult you! You're just confused because I said something insulting and quoted your post at the same time.

Where do I get the idea you're not relaxed? I have no idea.
 

zombiejoe

New member
Sep 2, 2009
4,108
0
0
SeanTheSheep said:
So you can either have virtual sex with our buddy who is playing with you in a TOTALLY NOT GAY WAY, HONEST, have virtual sex instead of real sex with a boyfriend/girlfriend or have virtual sex with a buddy of the oppsoite sex and make things weird between you two, or have sex with yourself using a different controller.

The second and last possibilities aren't valid if it's only online though, unless your boyfriend/girlfriend has a 360 too.

[HEADING=2]OH GODS I JUST THOUGHT OF A MIND BREAKING THING![/HEADING]
Molyneux says Fable III will use Project Natal, right?
Let the nightmares begin...
OMG! *BOOM*
 

jthm

New member
Jun 28, 2008
825
0
0
It won't make it in game. Who has to raise the little brat? Can't just leave a baby on it's own while both parents go a questing.