Logically, if you're attracted to neither, you can pick either.InnerRebellion said:I'm sorry, but I'm not attracted to either sex. So err... what do?
Logically, if you're attracted to neither, you can pick either.InnerRebellion said:I'm sorry, but I'm not attracted to either sex. So err... what do?
Heh, that wasn't true at all. I was curious to see what I would be told to do.Xanadu84 said:Logically, if you're attracted to neither, you can pick either.InnerRebellion said:I'm sorry, but I'm not attracted to either sex. So err... what do?
Either him, or, as many have said, Neil Patrick Harris. The standard geeky answer, I know, but it doesn't make it any less true.Macgyvercas said:David Tennant, hands down.
If you're into women who have a mouth like a baboon has a butt, yeah.Sexbad said:I'm gay so I'd probably need to fuck Angelina Jolie or something. She's hot, right?
Yeah bro. I've heard "bollocks to that" more regularly, but more Aussies don't say bollocks.AccursedTheory said:Judging by ol' Neils lead, i think I may have ended the thread.Daystar Clarion said:I've just ended this thread for all you guys.
You're welcome.
Bollocks to you ((Britains, can I use that word this way?).
They are genetically male.Devi Darkside said:Key term: were.-Zen- said:Though they were mentally female, they were physically male. That's the difference.Devi Darkside said:Ugh, I guess I'd have to with a rock then, seeing as how I'm attracted to men, women, shemales and men with vaginas...
Damn, I was hoping the twist was something I could actually do.
Edit:
Also, I can't help but wonder why it's so disturbing to see a picture of a woman who was born male. They were mentally female from the start so I question why there's even a difference, and a "Disturbing" one at that.AccursedTheory said:That used to be a BOY.
Which some how is more disturbing.