Ehh, slaves aren't really my thing... I prefer people to do what they will, willfully. But I suppose if I had to pick, Karen Gillan. Awwwwwhhhhh yeaaaaaahhhh...
You have a slave
- Thread starter CODE-D
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I've noticed in some of your previous posts that you too, are a huge Chie fan. I'd like to bring this glorious discovery to your attention http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10178436UncleUlty said:
OT: I'd enslave Glenn Beck or Shirley Phelps, You really don't want to know what horrific things I'd have them do to themselves. I'd probably have to flea the country afterwards.
Brian Moynihan
He is the CEO of Bank of America.
I would then rent him out to anyone who wants to beat the crap out of him.
He is the CEO of Bank of America.
I would then rent him out to anyone who wants to beat the crap out of him.
Would keep actor Chris Evans for a while. Just to have him doing things around the house shirtless. I mean, this body:
... and he's even fitter in Captain America ... Meanwhile I would beg him to marry me.
captcha: 'forbidden fruit' ... This thing is endowed with mystical powers I swear ...
captcha: 'forbidden fruit' ... This thing is endowed with mystical powers I swear ...
Anybody that can cook and clean really well, and also do my taxes. Possibly an ape.
Yes. A monkey butler that also does my taxes. That is the tits.
Oh woe is me.
Yes. A monkey butler that also does my taxes. That is the tits.
Wait that is the type of body people like? I always thought people like short, skinny guys with big foreheads.MasterOfHisOwnDomain said:Would keep actor Chris Evans for a while. Just to have him doing things around the house shirtless. I mean, this body:
... and he's even fitter in Captain America ... Meanwhile I would beg him to marry me.
Oh woe is me.
Your forced into. If you don't want a slave, then pick a hobo and set it free right after.the clockmaker said:
I'd pick a friend and make them do humiliating things for a week, then set 'em free.
I don't think that I would keep one long term.
I don't think that I would keep one long term.
I wasn't being serious at all, I was just able to relate to your post about your boyfriend essentially being your slave, I realize you were probably joking but it does seem that way in some relationships. Anyway, don't know you or what you are like but you strike me as defensive now.Grey Day for Elcia said:
Oh I was thought it was a joke but wasn't sure. Derp.Shotgun Guy said:
Yeah, I wasn't serious about him being a slave. I prefer to call hill willingly submissive. Sounds better
Hmm very funnyGameMaNiAC said:
OT: hmm i have a wife, so sex is not a question, uhhh i think some one to get stuff done around the house and take care of the kid
Don't much care for slavery for some odd reason, but the institution has potential positive uses.
For example, I might pick some random kid who looks destined to spend a fair chunk of life in prison but otherwise has potential to be something far greater than his life has molded him into. His time with me in between a few tasks to make up for his keep would involve learning respect for social and legal authority (with the distinction that respect doesn't mean blind obedience) as well as for himself, along with whatever practical education he missed. He'll be freed as soon as I'm convinced he can make his own way.
For example, I might pick some random kid who looks destined to spend a fair chunk of life in prison but otherwise has potential to be something far greater than his life has molded him into. His time with me in between a few tasks to make up for his keep would involve learning respect for social and legal authority (with the distinction that respect doesn't mean blind obedience) as well as for himself, along with whatever practical education he missed. He'll be freed as soon as I'm convinced he can make his own way.
cant decide between this person or Sara Underwood.the clockmaker said:
its suppose to be a "what if..." question, hypothetical. take the stick out your rear and play along. or keep your trap shut and explore other threads.
What if... what if the consequences were removed? Then the only thing keeping you from destroying someones life is consequences.Wushu Panda said:
What if you had the ability? Then you would enslave someone if you could.
What if they were willing? Then they wouldn't be a slave, outside of the kinky bdsm partner sort of way.
Obviously, unless you are turned on by clocks, it doesn't seem to be the third one in my case. (but lets face it, we are all turned on by clocks) so it has to be one of the first two.
I point you back to a previous post that I made in this thread where I said that just because something is a what if, doesn't make it okay. If I made a thread entitle "What celebrety would you rape" "If you could torture one person to death" or "If you were allowed to burn one type of kitten alive" that would not make it okay.
And you know what the fucked up part is, that parts of this thread could already be interpreted as a "who woud you rape" thread, I mean there is not a whole lot of other ways to look at 'oh yeah, she is hot, I would totally chain her up in my house against her will' (of course correct for your desired gender) On top of that, the replies trying to convince me put in, just a little bit make the whole thing seem like some sort of messed up drug PSA.
It would not matter the circumstance, it would not matter who it was, it would not matter how hot they were, I would not want to enslave some other human being. I am not going to try and call freedom of speech to defend this, one because when somebody is telling my that I have a stick up my arse litteraly for saying that slavery is bad then I don't have a lot of faith in the morals of the group and secondly because you do have the freedom to talk about your own opinions, however messed up they may be; So what I will say is this, slavery is fucking wrong, saying that you would only accept it in certain circumstances shows that you believe it to be not so bad and saying that you would do it only to a certain person shows that your morals only stand for as long as nothing undermines them. I mean think about it, if somebody seriously offered to stip Sarah underwood of her freedom and give her to you unwillingly, you would accept, because we have a word for that, its a...crime word.
youre boring, long winded, like to hear yourself speak and still maintain that large stick up your posterior. none of this even matters due to Rules # 11 and 20. give up and shut up.the clockmaker said:
"because we have a word for that, its a...crime word."
what the fuck was this even suppose to mean? its anti-climatic and makes you sound even dumber than you original appear. less is more.
Alright I'll wear that one, it is a cracked after hours quote and I shouldn't expect anyone else to watch the same webseries that I do. I do like the use of the word anti-climactic there though, it gives me an image of your hackles rising and rising as you read my post only for you to deflate at the end.Wushu Panda said:
For the rest of it, I stand by everything I said, mostly because you have done nothing but attack me as a person for what should really not be a controversial stance.
I mean sure, sit back and pat yourself on the back for coming up with the brilliant technique of telling someone who disagrees with you to shut up. I mean, I just can't compete with that, I bow before you O' Hannibal of words. And hey I won't even make fun of you for quote rules I've never heard of because its always fun to get new knowledge.
And you know what, I don't like to do this, but if you want to say I that seem dumb, use the correct word for the occasion. Normally, I could give two fucks about correct grammer, but seriously mate, 'dumber than you original appear' is like a caricature of a bad sentence.
You have put forward no reason why I should agree with you, no reason why you are right and pretty much just repeated your first post, only louder and more agressively. Or to translate this into something more along your lines 'nuh uh, you shut up!'
How have you never heard of the Rules of the Internet? They've been around for a while now and govern everything that happens here.the clockmaker said:
Rule 11- All your carefully picked arguments can easily be ignored.
Rule 20- Nothing is to be taken seriously.
grammar is not spelled with an E, and from now on Rule 11 applies to you as a whole.