You say it right there "enviable." Your preference of being has nothing to do with someone else's success.Bertylicious said:]I'm confused. Are we saying that the whole being alone and indoors AND obsessed with products predominantly marketed to children during your mid-thirties is an enviable state of being?
I'll give you an example. Sugar Ray Robinson is often said to have been the best boxer of all time. He still tops "top boxer" lists today and his name and achievements will be remembered for centuries.
Yet his career inevitably went into decline, as did his health. His family life was troubled and he died in poverty.
Was he a success?
The point being that success is relative to one's goals. You might think that getting lots of money and possessions is the height of success, but not everybody has the same goals as you.
If somebody wishes to make their life goal to be the worlds biggest pokemon fan, then "being alone and indoors AND obsessed with products predominantly marketed to children" is well on the way to success for them.
It's quite similar in a way to how people call others immature based on their own personal prejudice. You might look at someone in their mid-to-late 20's who still lives with their parents and deem them immature. Regardless of the economic or cultural factors that might be in play.