This'll probably get mentioned a couple dozen times but whenever they decided to make Duke Nukem into a shallow CoD clone. The whole two weapon/regenerating health thing is just so much overused horse-shit.
Y'know, when I wrote that, you were one of the individuals I had in mind.RedEyesBlackGamer said:I never played X-Com, but from what I've seen and been told, they have changed the genre of play style, the setting, the art style, and it has no reoccurring enemies from previous games. You know, nothing like X-Com. Bioware has just created hybrid titles. Now if ME3 was a fighting game, set in a medival fantasy setting, and had completely different characters...Zhukov said:PS. I predict more than a few mentions of Bioware in this thread.
Huh. What was so bad about it? I mean, I didn't like it at first, but I then realized that was just because using suit energy properly takes a LOT of getting use to. The motion blur also fucked me up for a while, but oddly turning up the sensitivity seemed to help a lot. I mean, yeah, there are a few issues here and there, but... I think it's pretty good.SammiYin said:I'm not sure if this counts, but Crysis 2 having a truly fantastic single player, and following up with a truly disgusting pile of shit multiplayer.
Snip
And it has 2-weapons limit.. And regenerating health.. And it basically sucks major balls.Dr. wonderful said:When Duke finally came out and it didn't have the kick Button!
But... they're fixing brothers in arms, making it less of a manly generic WW2 shooter.Neverhoodian said:Now I've never played the XCOM series, but I can relate to Spoony's reaction given what Gearbox is doing to the Brothers in Arms series:
Judging by your answer, I assume you haven't played a Brothers in Arms game before.SuperRobot64 said:But... they're fixing brothers in arms, making it less of a manly generic WW2 shooter.Neverhoodian said:Now I've never played the XCOM series, but I can relate to Spoony's reaction given what Gearbox is doing to the Brothers in Arms series: