Eh... some historical inaccuracies I usually forgive, so long as it's fair on both sides.BathorysGraveland2 said:Well, I admit, I haven't read too much historically accurate sources on Alexander's personal life, so I can't honourablly debate that.
What rankles me about Pride most is Durham's rather brash dismissal of Roman military prowess for most of the book, before just rolling over in defeat going into Zama. (FYI, 'the Battle of Zama' is one of historiography's biggest misnomers... EVER!) And I was a little disappointed with the plotholes that built up, as well, because I was curious as to Imilce's fate more than anything else... ah well...As for Pride of Carthage, I see what you mean. I did find the buildup of Zama and the confrontation between Hannibal and Scipio to be very rushed, and I was expecting to at least see some of the life after the war, as Hannibal remained in Carthage for several years as some kind of civilian officer (forgot what he was exactly), but after a hasty depiction of Zama, it just.. ends. In the non-historical side, some of the character arcs remain unfinished as well (what ever happened to Imco Vaca? Did he perish in Zama or did he re-unite with his love? What of Sapanibal and Hannibal's wife?). I understand the narrative decision to strip down the war to five years though, nothing breaks a story more than several "3 years later" jumps. This is an area where I think Tides of War suffered, it jumped ahead great deals of time too often.
Still, you're right, Hannibal retired briefly after the war, but shortly before Africanus' second consulship (or just after his censorship, not sure which), he (picture definition of irony) helped install Hannibal as suffete in Carthage (one of the most senior magisterial positions).
FYI... writing about this subject ATM (part one of three coming soon!)... keep eyes peeled on Amazon Kindle... ¬_¬ (yes, I'm sorry, shameless advertising, but it's relevant! >_< )
Actually, half of Durham's books are historical fiction, though Pride was the first in an ancient setting.In any case, the author doesn't appear to have done any more historical novels, so I guess it was a one-time thing that didn't work out for him. Unfortunately.
Well, this [http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/0862417252/ref=cm_cr_dp_hist_one?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addOneStar&showViewpoints=0] is my Amazon.co.uk review of it... (FYI, it's the long one!) and it rather lengthily sums up my opinion of it. The author was a classics grad from Oxford Uni, and judging from that piece of trash, it doesn't look as though even partially read either of the two great sources we still have for the subject material. My ire will never dampen against that 'book'... >_<I have not heard of Ross Leckie, though given your reaction, I'm not sure I really want to. Haha.