This was more of an opinion than me trying to state a hard fact..in my eyes, i see all war games as similar. And I did actually give both a good chance to play through, I just never finished either. So yeah, they obviously have their differences that make them slightly seperate, but in my opinion (which is kinda what a forum is meant to do, get peoples' opinions), they're just too close to each other for me to give credit.Dejanus said:
daftnoize said:
Don't worry... I didn't. Nor was my message supposed to sound nasty (I hope it didn't)... Here's a bit of advice for you. I know it's hard sometimes because you can't guess the voice in the post and you have to assume tone depending on the content of the post. However when reading most of my posts... Imagine a calm and happy voice. Don't worry, unless I've been really ticked off... I'm usually a calm fellow and I rarely post to offend anyone.
Fortunatly, Persona 4 is now getting overrated by many people thanks to Hiimdaisy live journal and the people who dubbed his comic of it. Though i suppose if i'd even known of its existance beforehand, i'd have loved it anyway (big JRPG fan... i've played all sorts)Ashsaver said:Overrated: Dragon Age (Don't get me wrong,It's a good game I like it a lot)
Underrated
Sorry, but that doesn't hold water to anyone who actually plays shooters. Sure, it's an opinion, but it's not a supported one and is also somewhat shallow. Now if you only play single player, I can see your point, but the Multiplayer structure plus weapon ballistics and design philosophy set them far apart. If you want to argue that Counter Strike and FEAR are the same game due to being modern shooters as well, I'll just shut up and watch from afar in detached amusement.claw38 said:
How is Heavenly Sowrd ( a ripoff of God Of War) better than God of War 2 and 3? I only played Mercs 2 and that game sucks ass. I don't see how the first could be better. Although some levels were cool to blow up the gameplay was repetitive and the story made no sense.Phoenixmgs said:
Assassin's Creed 2 is worst than the first game because it has NO CORE GAMEPLAY. The platforming isn't core gameplay, it's just how you get around; and the combat isn't core gameplay, it's what you do when you the guards catch onto you. The game is supposed to be about assassinating, and that aspect of AC2 is extremely weak and nearly nonexistent. In Assassin's Creed, they made the major assassinations fell like events; I'd say the assassinations in the first game were like playing Hitman-lite. Then, in the 2nd game, the main assassinations just feel like every other mission. I was hoping that Assassin's Creed would evolve more into a Hitman-like game (just for the assassinations obviously) and allow for more detailed assassinations that take some planning and stealth and have multiple ways to assassinate (like being able to poison, kill when sleeping, etc.); maybe take some things from the stealth portions of Batman:AA and some things from the Hitman series to make some really cool assassinations.ChrisRedfield92 said:
Heavenly Sword is much more entertaining and interesting because it has its own unique combat system where you have to switch stances, counter, and find the right combos to use against certain enemies to do well. GoW has pretty much the most basic combat system you can have, it worked fine in the first game, but now the system just feels so stale.IamSofaKingRaw said:
