Personally I don't have anything against Nintendo but I don't consider myself a fan of them by any means. It's simply because I haven't been presented with a reason to buy one of their consoles within the past 8-10 years. Back in the day, I absolutely LOVED my nes, snes, and n64...those things were full to the gills with games I thoroughly enjoyed. I still play my 64 and I would still play my snes if I still had it! But neither the Gamecube nor Wii have given me any reason to go their way. (Although I do like Metroid)
I've never been a fan of the casual game and it seems all of the big "reasons to buy a Wii" are centered around those, and their use of the motion control. I don't konw if it's just the principal of it but I realllllly hate the idea of playing video game tennis where you're all but actually playing tennis. If I wanted to play tennis then I'd get off my ass and do it. In retrospect, if it's something I can do in reality....then I hate the video game version. I like Halo because I can't go kill aliens in my spare time. But on the other hand when I want to play baseball then I get off my ass and do it, not stand there in the living room.
But I suppose that's just a preference issue and it's totally subjective from person to person. I'm fine with that, and that's why I say I'm not a Nintendo hater. If tha'ts your cup of tea then go nuts!
One thing I don't see mentioned is the debate about the Wii controlers being more intuitive. Do people really think traditional controllers aren't intuitive? I think they are. You have to move your fingers and thumbs but I haven't found adding wrist and arm movement to make it any "more" intuitive. If I can close my eyes and make my FPS character on screen turn 180º around and shoot somebody behind me, without even looking....well I think that's pretty damn intuitive (lol). To me it's a solution to a problem I didn't have.
The hardware....yeah it's not as good but frankly I could care less if the games drew me in. I enjoy spectacular graphics of the 360 and ps3 games but they don't make or break it to me.
I've never been a fan of the casual game and it seems all of the big "reasons to buy a Wii" are centered around those, and their use of the motion control. I don't konw if it's just the principal of it but I realllllly hate the idea of playing video game tennis where you're all but actually playing tennis. If I wanted to play tennis then I'd get off my ass and do it. In retrospect, if it's something I can do in reality....then I hate the video game version. I like Halo because I can't go kill aliens in my spare time. But on the other hand when I want to play baseball then I get off my ass and do it, not stand there in the living room.
But I suppose that's just a preference issue and it's totally subjective from person to person. I'm fine with that, and that's why I say I'm not a Nintendo hater. If tha'ts your cup of tea then go nuts!
One thing I don't see mentioned is the debate about the Wii controlers being more intuitive. Do people really think traditional controllers aren't intuitive? I think they are. You have to move your fingers and thumbs but I haven't found adding wrist and arm movement to make it any "more" intuitive. If I can close my eyes and make my FPS character on screen turn 180º around and shoot somebody behind me, without even looking....well I think that's pretty damn intuitive (lol). To me it's a solution to a problem I didn't have.
The hardware....yeah it's not as good but frankly I could care less if the games drew me in. I enjoy spectacular graphics of the 360 and ps3 games but they don't make or break it to me.