It isn't just " population" alone though, it is also the makeup of that population that affects the prevalence of interracial couples. You can have a larger population that is less ethnically diverse and that would make it much less common. When you look at the demographics of these states:MASTACHIEFPWN said:Bang whoever makes you happy.
I mean, I've grown up around Cincinnati, Ohio, and for the most part I guess it's accepted here? I don't really go around asking how people feel about it. I attended a rural high school, and there were plenty of racist kids there, so I imagine the idea still isn't taken very well in that area.
And yeah, this. States with higher population (Which, if you notice, the three most populated states in the US have taken the first three places) will more than likely be the ones found on this list. A more appropriate method would be some form of per-capita of singles using dating websites- which would be very difficult to effectively formulate.AccursedTheory said:Not to piss on the parade, but that's basically a list of the top 20 populated states, slightly out of order.Lil devils x said:Figures Texas is only second to California for interracial dating:
![]()
http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-raceethnicity/
It coincides with the prevalence of interest with interracial dating data from the dating website. These states being the highest immigration areas in the US is what contributes to them being much more ethnically diverse than most other states and is also why it is much more common to have an abundance of interracial families in these regions.