According to the devs, it "works best on a console and a bigger screen."Tommy T. said:Not really that good IMO.
Possibly because I really really want to play this game but M$ says no to us PC pricks.
This is all true. But the difference here is Remedy made the Normal so easy that the scary bad men are no longer scary, even when a large group of them jump out at you. I played the game on Hard first, and even that was not terribly difficult, but it did add a bit more anxiety, making it really feel like a thriller. When 6 guys appeared at once I ran like a scared rabbit. If the game is too easy, you become so confident that you can easily wade through anything it throws at you, then that defeats the thriller aspect. I made that mistake with Dead Space. I thought it was a mediocre game because I was never fearful of what might come at me. I should have played that game on Hard. I learned from my mistake, and I played Alan Wake on Hard.Hiroshi Mishima said:I find it funny that people still seem to be under the impresion that "the harder a game is the more fun it is" because really that's not entirely true. There's a lot of games that I love playing which you would never ever catch me playing on the harder difficulty settings...Moosh50 said:The biggest problem Yatzhee has with horror games is that he plays them on Normal difficulty. Why the fuck would anyone do that? It's survival horror, but the Normal difficulty setting makes it a third-person shooter with bad illumination.
It isn't. Yahtzee is genuinely the first person (that I bother paying attention to) to have voiced a negative opinion, and since he does exactly that for a living, I'd recommend giving it a rent over the weekend. You can beat it in two days with some effort, and at worst you've lost $8-$10.Blue-State said:Nuts. I saw a play through online and it didn't look so bad. But if the plot and pacing is half as bad as he says it is then I won't bother.
Indeed. It takes more than referencing Stephen King to make an awesome game. Plus, the way they go about it isn't even a good way to do it. Me, I wrote a story and I gave the bad guy a name that had the initials "RF." That's how you pay homage to great writers.Amata said:Lol yeah, not that many of his books are about that. Quite a few of them are set in the same small town, but yeah, still. Plus the Dark Tower series is awesome.
A very good review though, even if we disagree on the quality of Stephen King's books.![]()
Well that's a very retarded excuse. The devs must really think that the gamers are totally brainwashed.Tinneh said:According to the devs, it "works best on a console and a bigger screen."Tommy T. said:Not really that good IMO.
Possibly because I really really want to play this game but M$ says no to us PC pricks.
So?
That doesn't mean I wouldn't play it on PC.
Dummköpfe!
Is it a JRPG, perhaps? Because he's made it quite clear that he hates those. And Nintendo. So when he reviews Mario Galaxy 2 (correction, IF he reviews it, or any other game down the line, be it Zelda or Metroid) take it with a massive grain of salt.Hardcore_gamer said:It was not as fun as I hoped it was. He spent most of his time talking about how he gets stuck in the forest all the time.
How does it come Yahtzee never reviews grand strategy games like Hearts of Iron 3? That would be pretty awesome.
Deadly Premonition. Physically painful to play.DominoRBG said:Alan Wake or Deadly Premonition, choose one that makes you weep for humanity the most.
He has stated a number of times, the last I remember in the Brütal Legend video, that he does indeed not play such games. I suspect it is related to his emphasis on console games over PC games.Hardcore_gamer said:How does it come Yahtzee never reviews grand strategy games like Hearts of Iron 3? That would be pretty awesome.