Note that I specifically said he was "off-base on some of points". I definitely don't think he was conclusively wrong in everything he said about Bioshock 2, just that some of his complaints weren't valid, and I believe they weren't valid because he didn't invest enough time into actually exploring the game.Johann Goethe said:Let's conveniently ignore the fact that Yahtzee is a busy man with his fingers in several pies, including a TV show, a bar, and a novel, on top of playing games for Zero Punctuation in the first place. I do agree with you, that the information was there, but all that really matters is him actually getting to the end of the game in time for the review. It would have made more sense to play as Subject Delta if it was a prequel, as his sudden revival felt stretched.solidstatemind said:A perfect example of how Yahtzee is completely off-base on some of these points?
The point is: the info was there if you cared to look for it. Clearly, Yahtzee doesn't have time to actually thoroughly play a game; instead, he has to rip right through them as fast as possible looking for elements he can excoriate, rather than provide a legitimate, in-depth review.
Which is exactly why I consider his 'reviews' to not be informational, but simple entertainment.Plus, I'd like to actually explore Rapture rather than just stomp about a bit of seabed for a bit.I thought Vita-Chambers only worked for certain people?
Let's face it, while Yahtzee can legitimately say that he's very, very busy, he shouldn't penalize his audience for that fact-- it would be similar to me saying to my boss at work "sorry, but I couldn't debug that code as thoroughly as I was supposed to because I had to go to my second job." You think that would go over well? It wouldn't, and neither should we allow Yahtzee to make spurious claims about a game when the truth is that he just didn't spend the time to find the information that clarified the issue in question!
It's not like we're talking about easter eggs in God of War III here: BioShock is known for being plot-heavy (which is something that many of us actually like), so it's reasonable to conclude that these niggling questions/plot holes he brings up just might be addressed in some way... and Yahtzee is smart enough to realize that himself. I think he intentionally chose to overlook that thought so as to have more vitriol to spew.
But that's fine! I have no problem with that at all. Really! Still that is the exact reason why I've completely ceased to factor ZP into my purchasing decisions in any way, and now only consider it to be a cartoon I watch on Wednesdays where a dude with a cool accent and a cooler hat vents his spleen on a video game in funny and inventive ways.
Also, in re: your spoiler: I did mention that there was some ret-conning that was going to have to be done, but it didn't affect me anyway, because
the first thing I did was turn off the damn VitaChambers!! Yet another example of how Irrational improved the gameplay over the first
Edited for layout...