I think it's either he heard it was bad and wanted to see just how bad it could possibility be(now regretting that decision) or he wanted to blow off some steam and figured he'd pick a game he could actually get worked up about.09philj said:Of all the things you could have got caught up with, you chose this?
Well, the Wii U was noticeably absent from his Top 5 video, which you might call in itself a negative review.shadowxvii said:So that's the second review of not-the-wii-u-game-I-expected in a row (yes, i'm ignoring the top 5 video), and I'm losing hopes of seeing a xenoblade chronicles X review. Oh well, at least that was entertaining.
That many people bought it or that many people collected copies and burned them? Though I guess I can't discount the possibility that whoever made the game knew it wasn't gonna sell much and didn't bother with a large initial run.LordTerminal said:I get the feeling he just reviewed this because of its infamy and he wanted an easy target.
I'd get mad at him for that but I'm baffled as to how he even got a copy of it. The damn thing is rare.
I hate when people post the exact words I wanted to type.Scarim Coral said:Wow, we already got a good candidate for the worse game of 2016 for Yatzee award already???
Since October, not really, unless you count ports of PC games and "remasters". And, looking at the release schedule, he's pretty much going to be playing catch-up and filler until February (Unless he decides to do Lego Avengers).Gorfias said:Odd that he wonders when he will get to do a non-Wii U review. Why is he limited to that at this time? Isn't the number of titles to review for PS4 and XB1 dwarfing WiiU?