Zero Punctuation: Fable 2

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Grady said:
I just beat Fable 2, it's all fresh in my mind. Let's look into it, shall we?

Well, I liked the first Fable disregarding it's easiness (no deaths, no ressurection phials used) and picked up the second Fable, important to note I got the first one on the PC and the second on my new 360. A few parts bothered me, but mainly it was a fun game until you beat the storyline, and then slowly got dull afterwards.


Onto number two, I enjoied the gameplay, only part I don't like is blocking as after you get florishing it becomes annoying to use. I honestly would've preffered it if they found another button to put it on.

One improvement that was well needed was on guns, they don't totally suck ass in this Fable (hooray!).

One thing that really bothered me alot was the hype about "choices" in this game. The FIRST FABLE had more choices than this, mind you I just finished the game but I swear to god I better get to kill Reaver at some point.

And the main reason i'm posting on this thread is to ***** about the ending. Okay, you build up for a long time, great, inspire hatred towards the main villan, good, make him SHOOT YOUR DOG and KILL YOUR FAMILY, good, make you see the "life you could've had" and then see it transform into a hellish wasteland as you drift back into reality? Awesome. My blood was boiling at this point, and I sure as hell was ready to kick Lucien's ass. I do a bloodlust roar and run into his castle, seeing him drain the powers out of my two allies and one asshole.

I pull out the music box from my childhood and drain his hold on my friends as he starts to try to reason with me, I am ready to kill him and I draw my sword and ready a florish. He starts his "big evil guy speech" and I sit staring, ready for him to come at me with all he's got, ready for the most epic part that the last twenty minutes have been building upto.

And Reaver shoots him.

Reaver. Fucking. Shoots him. And he falls off the side. It's all over, I get a choice (i choose love) and it's onto the sandbox part of the game.

Fable II had the worst ending of any game I have ever played, period, and considering how much it sucked me into the story throughout it, it hurts to say that. I could do nothing but stare blankly at the screen for ten minutes as I arrived back in Oakfield.

Don't get me wrong, it's a good game and i'm probably going to go play it some more just for the hell of exploring/doing some extra quests/whatever but it lost my respects to the storyline the minute it got to the final fight vs. Lucien. From what i've looked up, either Reaver shoots him because you took too long, or you shoot him. Once.

Pathetic. That's all I have to say.
Yea, it's the most stupid thing. You aren't taking 'too long', they don't let you know when he's finished his ramblings. You don't kill the villain before their labourious speech, you kindly wait for them to finish then crush their dreams in front of their eyes.

So much for the freedom when an annoying side character who you never get to fight kills the final boss before you. Not so much rival NPC as the most ridiculous game design feature ever, bar none.
 

imkerrusin

New member
Jul 9, 2008
11
0
0
The most unfortunate thing about this game is, after you complete the main plot.

"Congratulations! You have saved the world from tyranny! Your are free to roam the world of Fable and do whatever you want."

"Sweet! . . . Now what?"
 

Muphin_Mann

New member
Oct 4, 2007
285
0
0
beddo said:
I hope Peter Molyneux watched this review and it helped him understand what a crappy game he made.

I mean besides all the game flaws it looked awful, didn't have a free roaming open world and a need to fade to black to load a new area for when the user climbed a ladder.
Aww! Anti-fanboys! Dont you love them? So stupid and shallow and clining to their absurde expectations; blind to all that is good or how something really stacks up to others in its genre.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Muphin_Mann said:
beddo said:
I hope Peter Molyneux watched this review and it helped him understand what a crappy game he made.

I mean besides all the game flaws it looked awful, didn't have a free roaming open world and a need to fade to black to load a new area for when the user climbed a ladder.
Aww! Anti-fanboys! Dont you love them? So stupid and shallow and clining to their [sic]absurde expectations; blind to all that is good or how something really stacks up to others in its genre.
Of course, not relishing an undeserving game with endless praise means I am somehow against this game as its own product. There aren't really any Fable 2 fanboys so I can't really be 'anti-fanboy' about this title. I played the first Fable and it was a fantastic game however, that was on the original Xbox, I kind of expected a lot more given the four year gap before the sequel was released. The fact is that the game was incredibly weak, it lived up to almost none of its promises.

It's not absurd to expect an open world adventure game, there are dozens of them and have been well before this generation. Also, it's not much to expect well crafted character models and an engine that can manage them as well as decent shaders, AI, physics and background loading. You couldn't even jump or step up small ledges in the game!

So tell me fanboy, how does Fable 2 stack up against other RPGs, pretty poorly from what I've seen.

EDIT: Also, see my other posts and you'll see I have considered numerous areas of Fable 2 and how they play. Is it absurd to ask that the game
lets you take the final strike against the antagonist of the story before the most annoying digital character since Jar Jar Binks does it for you?
Also, stop trolling.
 

Muphin_Mann

New member
Oct 4, 2007
285
0
0
beddo said:
Muphin_Mann said:
beddo said:
I hope Peter Molyneux watched this review and it helped him understand what a crappy game he made.

I mean besides all the game flaws it looked awful, didn't have a free roaming open world and a need to fade to black to load a new area for when the user climbed a ladder.
Aww! Anti-fanboys! Dont you love them? So stupid and shallow and clining to their [sic]absurde expectations; blind to all that is good or how something really stacks up to others in its genre.
Of course, not relishing an undeserving game with endless praise means I am somehow against this game as its own product. There aren't really any Fable 2 fanboys so I can't really be 'anti-fanboy' about this title. I played the first Fable and it was a fantastic game however, that was on the original Xbox, I kind of expected a lot more given the four year gap before the sequel was released. The fact is that the game was incredibly weak, it lived up to almost none of its promises.

It's not absurd to expect an open world adventure game, there are dozens of them and have been well before this generation. Also, it's not much to expect well crafted character models and an engine that can manage them as well as decent shaders, AI, physics and background loading. You couldn't even jump or step up small ledges in the game!

So tell me fanboy, how does Fable 2 stack up against other RPGs, pretty poorly from what I've seen.

EDIT: Also, see my other posts and you'll see I have considered numerous areas of Fable 2 and how they play. Is it absurd to ask that the game
lets you take the final strike against the antagonist of the story before the most annoying digital character since Jar Jar Binks does it for you?
Also, stop trolling.
I troll if i must to battle the assholes of the internet.

When i said anti-fanboy i ment you go out of your way to hate on something much like fanboys go out of their way to praise it.
The fact that Fable 2 was univeraly regarded as a good game makes it all the more obvious and pathetic. Every website you find that rates it lower than average will meet 10 reviewers who give it 8, 9, or 10 out of 10.

But hey, with lunatic fringe opinions like that I cant argue. You will never listen.

Besides. Its a good game, and i enjoy it, but im not really a fanboy enough to argue its merits vs every other RPG i have played. Of course, if your best argument is that an annoying character stole your spotlight and that a very common trope is invoked*...
well...
I dont have to.

*Wait high fences as zone bounds is very common in games. I recently played one where a tank couldnt cross them. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsurmountableWaistHeightFence?from=Main.InsurmountableWaistHighFence

And lest you think yourself not an anti-fanboy, consider those overwhelimgly positive reviews. How many reviewers gave it outright negetive reviews in proportion to all the neutral and positive ones? Look at the 5000+ reviews on IGN.
Either you are very far from what is the normal, rational opinion of the game, or almost everyone else is.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Muphin_Mann said:
trll f mst t bttl th sshls f th intrnt.

Whn sd nt-fnby mnt y g t f yr wy t ht n smthng mch lke fnbys g t f thr wy t prs t.
Th fct tht Fbl 2 ws nvrly rgrdd s gd gm mks t ll th mr bvs nd pthtc. vry wbst y fnd tht rates t lwr thn vrg wll mt 10 rvwrs wh gv t 8, 9, r 10 t f 10.

Bt hy, wth lntc frng pnns lk tht cnt rg. Y wll nvr lstn.

Bsds. ts gd gm, nd njy t, bt m nt rlly fnby ngh t rg ts mrts vs vry thr RPG hv plyd. f crs, f yr bst rgmnt s tht n nnyng chrctr stl yr sptlght nd tht vry cmmn trpe s nvkd*...
wll...
dnt hv t.

*Wt hgh fncs s zn bnds s vry cmmn n gms. rcntly plyd n whr tnk cldnt crss thm. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsurmountableWaistHeightFence?from=Main.InsurmountableWaistHighFence

nd lst y thnk yrslf nt n nt-fnby, cnsdr ths vrwhlmgly pstv rvws. Hw mny rvwrs gv t trght ngtv rvws n prprtn t ll th ntrl nd pstve ns? Lk t th 5000+ rvws n GN.
thr y r vry fr frm wht s th nrml, rtnl pnn f th gm, r lmst vryn ls s.
You're still trolling me!? I've disemvowelled you for being a troll despite the fact that it actually covers up your numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

I don't base my experience of a game on what others think. I have my own view and opinions and am able to voice them with conviction. Conversely, you seem to only be able to express opinions that you have been told to have.

If want to look at the 'review' scores then consider the user score from Metacritic - 6.1 which comes from a more eclectic group of users than IGN.

For future posts please make sure you spell check your work and read it through before posting.
 

Muphin_Mann

New member
Oct 4, 2007
285
0
0
beddo said:
Muphin_Mann said:
trll f mst t bttl th sshls f th intrnt.

Whn sd nt-fnby mnt y g t f yr wy t ht n smthng mch lke fnbys g t f thr wy t prs t.
Th fct tht Fbl 2 ws nvrly rgrdd s gd gm mks t ll th mr bvs nd pthtc. vry wbst y fnd tht rates t lwr thn vrg wll mt 10 rvwrs wh gv t 8, 9, r 10 t f 10.

Bt hy, wth lntc frng pnns lk tht cnt rg. Y wll nvr lstn.

Bsds. ts gd gm, nd njy t, bt m nt rlly fnby ngh t rg ts mrts vs vry thr RPG hv plyd. f crs, f yr bst rgmnt s tht n nnyng chrctr stl yr sptlght nd tht vry cmmn trpe s nvkd*...
wll...
dnt hv t.

*Wt hgh fncs s zn bnds s vry cmmn n gms. rcntly plyd n whr tnk cldnt crss thm. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsurmountableWaistHeightFence?from=Main.InsurmountableWaistHighFence

nd lst y thnk yrslf nt n nt-fnby, cnsdr ths vrwhlmgly pstv rvws. Hw mny rvwrs gv t trght ngtv rvws n prprtn t ll th ntrl nd pstve ns? Lk t th 5000+ rvws n GN.
thr y r vry fr frm wht s th nrml, rtnl pnn f th gm, r lmst vryn ls s.
You're still trolling me!? I've disemvowelled you for being a troll despite the fact that it actually covers up your numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

I don't base my experience of a game on what others think. I have my own view and opinions and am able to voice them with conviction. Conversely, you seem to only be able to express opinions that you have been told to have.

If want to look at the 'review' scores then consider the user score from Metacritic - 6.1 which comes from a more eclectic group of users than IGN.

For future posts please make sure you spell check your work and read it through before posting.
Long post coming up, if you feel like an ass or are short on time just skip all my logic and barbs and head right to the challenge at the bottom.
Ok. I give you props. The way you edited me when you quoted me was fairly amusing. Seems like you mostly removed the vowels.

But still, if i am a troll then you know i wont stop. At least i think i wont. Your the first person in my years of interneting to call me a troll. But i have taken it upon myself to battle your illogical and lunatic hatred of a worthy game with all my courage and evil troll power. I will endeavor to be a worthy troll for you to defeat with your quick wit, stunning logical power, and OCD levels of grammatical correctness.

Opinion someone told me to have? Who told me? Point out those scoundrals!
Oh, you mean the millions who felt it was a good or even simply ok game (6.1 is an ok game. 2 would be a crappy game. You called the game crappy.)
Look mister, if you cant figure out the differance between agreement and blind conformity then you need more help than i can give.
I would personaly rate the game a high 7.x or a low 8.x
Ok. First i would like to point out that your chosen review site is a very very harsh one. At least, the non professional reviewers are. They also scored The Orange Box, Halo 3, Mass Effect, and Fallout 3 lower than the Pros.
But hey, lets go with them.
Thats one slighly negetice review.
Now its my turn.
http://www.gametrailers.com/game/fable-ii/2669
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/921/921508p1.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/927246-fable-ii/index.html
http://reviews.cnet.com/xbox-360-games/fable-2-xbox-360/4505-11457_7-31484624.html
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3170860
http://blog.seattlepi.com/digitaljoystick/archives/151939.asp
http://www.planetxbox360.com/article_4881/Fable_2_-_Review
http://reviews.walmart.com/1336/10086511/reviews.htm
http://games.toptenreviews.com/reviews/g9549.htm

I opened these sites not knowing what the results would be. In fact, only one site i went to isnt listed. Its your metacritic site. Since you already listed it i didnt feel the need to.
Interestingly enough. They all rated it higher.
I opened 10 websites at random, and the worst score i found was the slightly negetive one you gave as your only example of support.

I dont care that you dont like the game. I care that you hate it, and that you blind yourself to the "white light of reason" (to steal from Woolf) with this hatred to rant and rave and grasp desperatly at straws and distort reality and resort to demonizing (the game, the creator, and me) and resort to backwards logic (people dont like it because of favorable reviews, the reviews are favorable because it is liked) and being unwilling to even admit that you are a blind radical. Your last post wasnt a rebuttal so much as an insult and a pathetic attempt to hide behind the still-likes-it-better-than-you review in one single site.

I doubt you really read my post. I doubt you will read this one. I suppose, as long as i am typing stream of conscous style, that i should reflect on how that bothers me.
I like to have my arguments heard and mulled over. But i suppose that if anyone else reads this and then sees a reply that didnt i will have won a victory in that i put effort and thought into my words, and you, friend, did not.

But it wouldnt be fair if you didnt have a clear way to defeat me (evil troll you claim me to be) so i offer this challenge. Post nine (so as to beat me by 1) more sites with reviews of Fable 2 under 6.5, that are not hate-sites, and i will post no more than to say that you truly are my better, and that Fable 2 is not a good game.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Muphin_Mann said:
beddo said:
Muphin_Mann said:
trll f mst t bttl th sshls f th intrnt.

Whn sd nt-fnby mnt y g t f yr wy t ht n smthng mch lke fnbys g t f thr wy t prs t.
Th fct tht Fbl 2 ws nvrly rgrdd s gd gm mks t ll th mr bvs nd pthtc. vry wbst y fnd tht rates t lwr thn vrg wll mt 10 rvwrs wh gv t 8, 9, r 10 t f 10.

Bt hy, wth lntc frng pnns lk tht cnt rg. Y wll nvr lstn.

Bsds. ts gd gm, nd njy t, bt m nt rlly fnby ngh t rg ts mrts vs vry thr RPG hv plyd. f crs, f yr bst rgmnt s tht n nnyng chrctr stl yr sptlght nd tht vry cmmn trpe s nvkd*...
wll...
dnt hv t.

*Wt hgh fncs s zn bnds s vry cmmn n gms. rcntly plyd n whr tnk cldnt crss thm. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsurmountableWaistHeightFence?from=Main.InsurmountableWaistHighFence

nd lst y thnk yrslf nt n nt-fnby, cnsdr ths vrwhlmgly pstv rvws. Hw mny rvwrs gv t trght ngtv rvws n prprtn t ll th ntrl nd pstve ns? Lk t th 5000+ rvws n GN.
thr y r vry fr frm wht s th nrml, rtnl pnn f th gm, r lmst vryn ls s.
You're still trolling me!? I've disemvowelled you for being a troll despite the fact that it actually covers up your numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

I don't base my experience of a game on what others think. I have my own view and opinions and am able to voice them with conviction. Conversely, you seem to only be able to express opinions that you have been told to have.

If want to look at the 'review' scores then consider the user score from Metacritic - 6.1 which comes from a more eclectic group of users than IGN.

For future posts please make sure you spell check your work and read it through before posting.
Long post coming up, if you feel like an ass or are short on time just skip all my logic and barbs and head right to the challenge at the bottom.
Ok. I give you props. The way you edited me when you quoted me was fairly amusing. Seems like you mostly removed the vowels.

But still, if i am a troll then you know i wont stop. At least i think i wont. Your the first person in my years of interneting to call me a troll. But i have taken it upon myself to battle your illogical and lunatic hatred of a worthy game with all my courage and evil troll power. I will endeavor to be a worthy troll for you to defeat with your quick wit, stunning logical power, and OCD levels of grammatical correctness.

Opinion someone told me to have? Who told me? Point out those scoundrals!
Oh, you mean the millions who felt it was a good or even simply ok game (6.1 is an ok game. 2 would be a crappy game. You called the game crappy.)
Look mister, if you cant figure out the differance between agreement and blind conformity then you need more help than i can give.
I would personaly rate the game a high 7.x or a low 8.x
Ok. First i would like to point out that your chosen review site is a very very harsh one. At least, the non professional reviewers are. They also scored The Orange Box, Halo 3, Mass Effect, and Fallout 3 lower than the Pros.
But hey, lets go with them.
Thats one slighly negetice review.
Now its my turn.
http://www.gametrailers.com/game/fable-ii/2669
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/921/921508p1.html
http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/927246-fable-ii/index.html
http://reviews.cnet.com/xbox-360-games/fable-2-xbox-360/4505-11457_7-31484624.html
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3170860
http://blog.seattlepi.com/digitaljoystick/archives/151939.asp
http://www.planetxbox360.com/article_4881/Fable_2_-_Review
http://reviews.walmart.com/1336/10086511/reviews.htm
http://games.toptenreviews.com/reviews/g9549.htm

I opened these sites not knowing what the results would be. In fact, only one site i went to isnt listed. Its your metacritic site. Since you already listed it i didnt feel the need to.
Interestingly enough. They all rated it higher.
I opened 10 websites at random, and the worst score i found was the slightly negetive one you gave as your only example of support.

I dont care that you dont like the game. I care that you hate it, and that you blind yourself to the "white light of reason" (to steal from Woolf) with this hatred to rant and rave and grasp desperatly at straws and distort reality and resort to demonizing (the game, the creator, and me) and resort to backwards logic (people dont like it because of favorable reviews, the reviews are favorable because it is liked) and being unwilling to even admit that you are a blind radical. Your last post wasnt a rebuttal so much as an insult and a pathetic attempt to hide behind the still-likes-it-better-than-you review in one single site.

I doubt you really read my post. I doubt you will read this one. I suppose, as long as i am typing stream of conscous style, that i should reflect on how that bothers me.
I like to have my arguments heard and mulled over. But i suppose that if anyone else reads this and then sees a reply that didnt i will have won a victory in that i put effort and thought into my words, and you, friend, did not.

But it wouldnt be fair if you didnt have a clear way to defeat me (evil troll you claim me to be) so i offer this challenge. Post nine (so as to beat me by 1) more sites with reviews of Fable 2 under 6.5, that are not hate-sites, and i will post no more than to say that you truly are my better, and that Fable 2 is not a good game.
You are trolling me because you won't give up and just accept I disagree with you. You also ignore the forum rules and don't bother to check your spelling, punctuation, grammar and so on.

As I said before:

"I don't base my experience of a game on what others think. I have my own view and opinions and am able to voice them with conviction."

Hence, I will not be drawn into further discussion let alone some pathetic 'challenge' to scour the web to find review sites that agree with me.

If I actually 'Hated' the game I wouldn't have played through it. It had it's moments and it's good points but to me, it fell far short of what it could have been. My overall feeling is that the game was poor.

That is all, please stop trolling me.
 

Muphin_Mann

New member
Oct 4, 2007
285
0
0
beddo said:
That is all, please stop trolling me.
mmmm...well i guess i could stop.

If someone is going to call me a troll then i want it to be memorable. And you look really silly complaining about spelling and grammer on the internet, the birthplace of l337sp34k.
But on the other hand you have brought that up multiple times now so if you keep argueing i have a feeling your responses will only start turning circles. But it is really funny that you insult my grammer and call me a troll but still say please. If i were really some neandrethal i would be unmoved by please.

But whatever, i will stop.
 

David Bray

New member
Jan 8, 2010
819
0
0
Fable 2 is just stagnant. As you said, it presumes you care. "You can, but why would you want to."
Sadly, i have some strange magnetism to the Fable series. I don't like them, they're poor rpgs and lifeless fantasy but i keep coming back for more. I got this not liking the original and i will get 3 not liking this. Tragic.
 

DayDay8421

New member
Nov 10, 2008
9
0
0
David Bray said:
Fable 2 is just stagnant. As you said, it presumes you care. "You can, but why would you want to."
Sadly, i have some strange magnetism to the Fable series. I don't like them, they're poor rpgs and lifeless fantasy but i keep coming back for more. I got this not liking the original and i will get 3 not liking this. Tragic.
Yeah I know what you mean, I've done the same thing. I keep pushing on hoping that I will have the fabled Eureka moment (sorry poor pun), but it never comes :(
 

Spydiggity

New member
Feb 28, 2010
30
0
0
I just started Fable 2 for the first time the other day, and I can't tell you how accurate this review is. This was the first Yahtzee review i ever saw a year or so ago, and i thought it was hilarious but didn't know what to make of it. since then, i've discovered we agree on almost everything (sept infamous...man that game fuckin sucked). the best part was the explanation of combat, which is spot on.

thanks for the inspiration, wanker
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
I didn't find Fable 2 particularly unenjoyable. My only real complaints were the amount of bugs in the game, but that could also be attributed to the fact that my 360 flipped shit and died about a week after playing the game.

Yahtzee's right on many accounts, especially the "Why would you want to?" things, but I've thought on this for a while and come up with the answer: Because I can. Why would I want to marry a hooker and have her live in a castle? Because I can and because everybody looks at me funny when I do. There doesn't -have- to be a point to it all, necessarily, it just has to be fun; which Fable 2 was for me. I thought the combat was sleek, not very clunky and I enjoyed being able to have my actions actually visible in the game as consequences. Surely they weren't enormous changes (besides when you go off to the Spire and come back), but they were present, and I liked seeing it all.

On a scale from 1-10, I'd go with 7.4. It won't knock your socks off, it's not "revolutionary", but it's worth buying I think.
 

Neferius

New member
Sep 1, 2010
361
0
0
Well, it was a Special breed of Dog that... aaaah Fuck it!
I hate Peter's guts for sucking-off Microsoft instead of porting this to the PC *boo* *hiss* :((
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
finally giving this a spin...not too bad, and I haven't even gotten to killing people yet. but I feel like I'm gonna get bored and have to put the game down for a few months before resuming :/ I do that with some of RPGs (action or...oh I suppose action yeah)

gonna try to see how many wives I can attain by the end of the game...and an army of children >:D