Zero Punctuation: Fear 2

Recommended Videos

Decimator 3000

New member
Dec 10, 2008
5
0
0
The other FEAR games were for consoles idiots, I know this becauase I own the other FEAR games for Xbox 360. Of course Yahtzee gives out the impression that us console gamers are all a bunch of mindless twats who don't know anything about video games.

Lets not forget that Yahtzee is not a real game critic just a comedian.
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
Would the Final Fantasy games be considered sequels of one another?
 

defcon 1

New member
Jan 3, 2008
458
0
0
On the note of the mech, How am I suppose to be frightened of anything when I'm practically indestructible. This is suppose to be a frightening game but I'm just not seeing it.

A world without sequels. Not sure what to say about that. Yes it would be nice but some of my favorite games are sequels. Interesting idea though.
 

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
A world without sequels? Are you lot fucking serious? Why shouldn't a developer be able to try and improve on a previous product? Can you imagine if Henry Ford said "Well, i've made one car. No need to make an improved version of it." People complain about developers "money-grubbing"..... well, here's a newsflash! Game development is a fucking business!! And if the sequel that comes out is rubbish? Then don't buy it! No one's forcing you to! Do you really think it's THAT easy to just come up with an original idea for EVERY video game? Game development would have either stopped, or be reduced to a trickle of about 3 games a year!
So yeah, sometimes sequels don't work out. But if it wasn't for the bad games, we wouldn't appreciate the good ones. Sequels only happen because people want them. If they didn't want them, they wouldn't pay for them.
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
Fabulous rant over a complaint you apparently completely misunderstand, smudgey.

As for me, I live in a world of sequels... I just refuse to buy them unless research indicates sufficient improvement has taken place.

I've played the F.E.A.R. 2 demo and I'm not too surprised to hear it being called an extension F.E.A.R. 1. The only value I expect I'd get out of this game is more of the same kind of moments.

Might be worth a shot when the game hits the $20 point.
 

MercurySteam

Tastes Like Chicken!
Legacy
Apr 11, 2008
4,948
2
43
Actually, the cloned soldiers are ment to be controlled by Alma's children, but only one is fit to do so, and after he dies she has no choice to, which seems kinda ironic since as her son you have to go around fighting them Extraction Point.

And the quick-time event used to defeat that Colonel is SO FUCKING ANNOYING.

I hate quick-time events.
 

SurfPenguin

New member
Sep 3, 2008
19
0
0
I too would like to live in that alternate universe where sequels are banned. It would be a far happier place...
 

mad_mick

New member
Jul 19, 2008
102
0
0
agreed. what im getting at is the final fantasys are repetitive, as are 99.9 persent of shooters. i want some origanialty damn it lol
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
lol. it was good. a world without sequals, soudns good in a way.
one thing i agree strongly with him, is about the add ons. they really suck. fear 2, i have to say, was much better then part 1 and surely better then the bad add ons. maybe my point of view.
why i find fear 2 better?
not in boring office buildings, horror was still good (but i agree, not always it was scary), the AI has its moments but not so bad as he said; so i dont really agree with him there, tits????? WTF. only because alma is naked in this game doesnt mean anything sexual. already in the first fear you see her nude; so i dissagree there too, it has a reason why alma attacks you, which you find out in the end of the game.
and i find it good that it has not a simple ending. peng, "the end". this, i think, would be bad. does everything must have a ending?
so with few things i disagree with him but otherwise it was a good review.
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
As a member of the glorious PC gaming master race *wink*, I am pretty pissed with Monolith over FEAR 2. FEAR, while not a stellar game itself, featured the most under-rated FPS MP gameplay, possibly ever. So for them to release this lousy port developed for consoles, without anti-cheat or server files- was a total insult to a lot of us from the original MP community.

The lack of server files especially stings. If you want to play MP you have to find someone hosting a game from their home computer, where you lag and they don't, where 16 player matches are a pointless warp-fest and when the host quits you have to find another room.

The problem is Monolith, so I'm never buying another product from Monolith again. Everyone works hard making games, but those people can always go work for somebody else. I sincerely hope their sales continue to tank and Warner Bros. guts their studio.

Hopefully the asshole responsible for FEAR 2 will be one of the ones to not be re-hired in the gaming industry. Hopefully that person will find his place in accounting, finance or some other uninspired, non-creative profession where he can never influence art or entertainment ever again.

I think Ben has said something about it before, but your patronage is the only real voice or power you have over this business. They don't give a rat's ass about what people say on forums; or worse. The gaming press is generally a complete joke as their bread and butter consists entirely of ad revenues from the subject of their "journalism."

Who's gonna look out for you? Developers? No. Gaming press? No. It's gotta be gamers looking out for gamers or it's more lackluster sequels and ports for you.
 

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
geldonyetich said:
Fabulous rant over a complaint you apparently completely misunderstand, smudgey.
I understand what people are saying; they're sick of endless rehashes and milking of franchises, and that's fair enough. But for people to suggest "No sequels" is actually a good idea, especially when there ARE developers who genuinely try and keep their much-loved franchises fresh? Look at resident evil; the series had an overhaul with RE 4, and RE 6 is allegedly going to be another re-booting of the franchise. Or COD4, which leapt out of WW2 and into the modern world. But I guess i shouldn't bother. If companies give people more of what they want, they'll complain that it's the same old thing. Give them something new, and they'll complain because they miss the old stuff.
 

Wingmna

New member
Feb 10, 2009
76
0
0
id totally be up to banning sequals, terminator 2, hl2, etc would just be totally remade as different movies/games rather then sequals